Hello,
Can this partitioning/formatting be a problem: mke2fs /dev/sda6 -t ext4 -b 2048 -L boot0 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/root_usr -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_local -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_lib -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_src -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/tmp -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpUsr_DK0/home -t ext4 -b 2048 ?
Then the mount point is on / (root_usr)
Thank.
Hi,
2013/3/1 Patrick Dupre Patrick.Dupre@univ-littoral.fr:
Hello,
Can this partitioning/formatting be a problem: mke2fs /dev/sda6 -t ext4 -b 2048 -L boot0 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/root_usr -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_local -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_lib -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_src -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/tmp -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpUsr_DK0/home -t ext4 -b 2048 ?
A separate partition for /usr might not be a good idea:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
Greetings,
-- Jorge Martínez López jorgeml@gmail.com http://www.jorgeml.net
Hello,
I can say that it is definitively not good. My conclusion is that /lib /lib64 should be on the same partition as / IF not the installation fails. It would be good to document it if not already done. Hence, an upgrade from Fedora 16 to Fedora 18 with /lib on a different partiton as / will probably fails too. Could you document it if not done with the instructions to such an upgrade.
Thank.
2013/3/1 Patrick Dupre Patrick.Dupre@univ-littoral.fr:
Hello,
Can this partitioning/formatting be a problem: mke2fs /dev/sda6 -t ext4 -b 2048 -L boot0 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/root_usr -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_local -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_lib -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/usr_src -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpSys_DK0/tmp -t ext4 -b 2048 mke2fs /dev/VolGrpUsr_DK0/home -t ext4 -b 2048 ?
A separate partition for /usr might not be a good idea:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
Greetings,
-- Jorge Martínez López jorgeml@gmail.com http://www.jorgeml.net -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Am 04.03.2013 17:01, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
I can say that it is definitively not good. My conclusion is that /lib /lib64 should be on the same partition as / IF not the installation fails. It would be good to document it if not already done. Hence, an upgrade from Fedora 16 to Fedora 18 with /lib on a different partiton as / will probably fails too. Could you document it if not done with the instructions to such an upgrade
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
who does this these days and for what reason?
it makes pretty no sense on a OS with a RPM database spread /, /usr and /var/lib over different partitions or disks because you can not really live without one of them
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.03.2013 17:01, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
I can say that it is definitively not good. My conclusion is that /lib /lib64 should be on the same partition as / IF not the installation fails. It would be good to document it if not already done. Hence, an upgrade from Fedora 16 to Fedora 18 with /lib on a different partiton as / will probably fails too. Could you document it if not done with the instructions to such an upgrade
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
who does this these days and for what reason?
I USED to install Fedora on my eeepc 901 with /usr not on the root partition. that machine has a 4 gig SSD and a 16 gig SSD. I'd put / on the 4 gig, /home, /usr and swap on the 16 gig. if I put /usr on the 4-gig partition it'd be almost full right off the bat, so that simply adding a few more packages and it'd be full. so I moved /usr to the other drive.
but since you can't have a (supported) separate /usr anymore I've stopped doing that. now I just make both drives into a LVM and put everything inside it. it feels slower that way, but at leasst it all fits.