Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
Any suggestions?
sean
sean wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
Any suggestions?
sean
What?! Are you complaining that you have to wait a little while for something that is free?!
How rude!!!! :)
On 4/25/07, sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
Any suggestions?
Yes, next time do a clean install! Your system has too little memory installed. You need at least 256 MB, preferably more.
sean
Yes, next time do a clean install! Your system has too little memory installed. You need at least 256 MB, preferably more.
Which is a ridiculous state of affairs IMHO. What if the user only wants a light desktop system, or a headless server. For these things 128M should be fine. Not exactly nippy but would run OK.
As things stand at the moment, the standard anaconda installer requires as much memory as a full gnome/kde desktop. Is it just me me thinks this is just a tad silly.
There are many desktops out there that run fine with 128M, XFCe or fvwm for instance. XFCE is even part of extras. So an installer that requires more ram that the system it is installing.... go figure.
Chris
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 23:01 +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Yes, next time do a clean install! Your system has too little memory installed. You need at least 256 MB, preferably more.
Which is a ridiculous state of affairs IMHO. What if the user only wants a light desktop system, or a headless server. For these things 128M should be fine. Not exactly nippy but would run OK.
As things stand at the moment, the standard anaconda installer requires as much memory as a full gnome/kde desktop. Is it just me me thinks this is just a tad silly.
There are many desktops out there that run fine with 128M, XFCe or fvwm for instance. XFCE is even part of extras. So an installer that requires more ram that the system it is installing.... go figure.
Chris
It is silly but that is the way it is. It reminds me that I just saw "Showstoppers", the book about the development of WinNT. An argument arose between Bill Gates and David Carver (the developer). Gates said it should run in 1M of ram ; Carver held out for 8M. Now we have Vista that takes 1G. That's progress? -- ======================================================================= Try to value useful qualities in one who loves you. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@sbcglobal.net
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
There's a 1 gig swap partition. It's an old Gateway the I use without X, just cli, as an internal firewall, dhcp server, etc. I'd like to upgrade to keep all the little housekeeping settings I've made over the years.
I'm also surprised it's not disk trashing - that's what I expected. 36 hours might not be too long to actually install the packages.
But it never even started - no disk access light once the Package Installation screen came up.
It there any way to check if anaconda actually finds the swap partition ( Which shouldn't be hard - only one disk, swap is hda2 )?
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
sean
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
FC6 requires 256 MB of ram. Please check out the system requirements.
Goksin Akdeniz wrote:
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
FC6 requires 256 MB of ram. Please check out the system requirements.
Not really. It depends on what software you are running.
Rahul
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 03:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Goksin Akdeniz wrote:
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
FC6 requires 256 MB of ram. Please check out the system requirements.
Not really. It depends on what software you are running.
Rahul
Rahul, Has any one among the Fedora group actually upgraded to FC6 using 128 K of RAM? I admit it depends on things but it should be between difficult to impossible in most hardware.
On Thursday 26 April 2007 13:53, Aaron Konstam wrote:
Rahul, Has any one among the Fedora group actually upgraded to FC6 using 128 K of RAM? I admit it depends on things but it should be between difficult to impossible in most hardware.
I did. Though it was not an upgrade, but a clean install. The machine was 700Mhz (or so), with 128MB ram. Anaconda wanted to format and use the swap partition as soon as I chose the layout of partitions, and I allowed it. After solving the faulty cd drive issue, the install went smoothly. Minimum set of packages, though I did not try more than that.
However, it was *not* an upgrade.
Best regards, :-) Marko
Marko Vojinovic Institute of Physics University of Belgrade ====================== e-mail: vmarko@phy.bg.ac.yu
On 4/25/07, sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
There's a 1 gig swap partition. It's an old Gateway the I use without X, just cli, as an internal firewall, dhcp server, etc. I'd like to upgrade to keep all the little housekeeping settings I've made over the years.
I'm also surprised it's not disk trashing - that's what I expected. 36 hours might not be too long to actually install the packages.
But it never even started - no disk access light once the Package Installation screen came up.
It there any way to check if anaconda actually finds the swap partition ( Which shouldn't be hard - only one disk, swap is hda2 )?
What shows on the other console (ctrl-alt-F2)?
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
Definitely, since you won't go through two update cycles, i.e. first install FC6 over older version and then update newly installed but stale packages.
sean
Kam Leo wrote:
On 4/25/07, sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
There's a 1 gig swap partition. It's an old Gateway the I use without X, just cli, as an internal firewall, dhcp server, etc. I'd like to upgrade to keep all the little housekeeping settings I've made over the years.
I'm also surprised it's not disk trashing - that's what I expected. 36 hours might not be too long to actually install the packages.
But it never even started - no disk access light once the Package Installation screen came up.
It there any way to check if anaconda actually finds the swap partition ( Which shouldn't be hard - only one disk, swap is hda2 )?
What shows on the other console (ctrl-alt-F2)?
Never knew you could access another console on install.
The install kernel did find a swap partition with 360 megs. 70megs were cached, ~ 300 megs free.
top showed anaconda cpu at 99.4% and .exe ( ?? ) at 0.5%.
So maybe anaconda really doing something - hard to imagine if it's not accessing the disk but maybe another night could show progress.
What is anaconda supposed to be doing at this stage?
sean
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 19:02 -0400, sean wrote:
Kam Leo wrote:
On 4/25/07, sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
There's a 1 gig swap partition. It's an old Gateway the I use without X, just cli, as an internal firewall, dhcp server, etc. I'd like to upgrade to keep all the little housekeeping settings I've made over the years.
I'm also surprised it's not disk trashing - that's what I expected. 36 hours might not be too long to actually install the packages.
But it never even started - no disk access light once the Package Installation screen came up.
It there any way to check if anaconda actually finds the swap partition ( Which shouldn't be hard - only one disk, swap is hda2 )?
What shows on the other console (ctrl-alt-F2)?
Never knew you could access another console on install.
The install kernel did find a swap partition with 360 megs. 70megs were cached, ~ 300 megs free.
top showed anaconda cpu at 99.4% and .exe ( ?? ) at 0.5%.
So maybe anaconda really doing something - hard to imagine if it's not accessing the disk but maybe another night could show progress.
What is anaconda supposed to be doing at this stage?
Well, one of the things it has to sort out is package dependencies. That doesn't thrash the HD so much as it does RAM. I'm willing to bet that's what's happening.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Principal Engineer rstevens@internap.com - - VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com - - - - Cuteness can be overcome through sufficient bastardry - - --Mark 'Kamikaze' Hughes - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan, Did you enable the Extras repositories before doing the install? It happen to me when I wanted to install the whole selection of games (200) from the Extras and after 6 hours nothing happened. I restarted the install unchecked FC Extras repositories, do the install and after first boot, run pirut enable the repos and selected all the games. I went to sleep the next morning all the games were there. Try again.
Linux user number 433512 "Free as in Freedom": http://counter.li.org
--------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
What shows on the other console (ctrl-alt-F2)?
Never knew you could access another console on install.
Yup, you can even use the apps that are already installed. I heard from a friend (but not tried myself) that you can even watch a movie with mplayer during the install :-). But maybe that is a bit too much...
The install kernel did find a swap partition with 360 megs. 70megs were cached, ~ 300 megs free.
top showed anaconda cpu at 99.4% and .exe ( ?? ) at 0.5%.
I had the exact same behavior on a similar machine (700MHz, 128MB RAM) doing a clean install. On a dozen various attempts, anaconda just hanged at random points --- during "starting install process", or during installation of this or that package (mostly somwhere in the middle of the install). No matter graphical or text installation, no matter the selection of packages. The install media passed the check. The symptoms are always the same --- top shows anaconda is working 99%, hd is idle, everything else is waiting. Memtest ran ok for several hours before...
It just may be the too low memory issue, but things got better when I replaced the cd drive with another. Then I was able to do a smooth clean install of minimal set of packages, boot the machine and yum everything else needed.
Btw, that "faulty" cd drive was afterwards completely functional and had no problem with it since (it's back in the box).
There are two possible explanations that I gave to myself:
1) Anaconda doesn't like to try hard to read the data off the cd. If it fails on the first try, it hangs, pretending to be working 99.something %. 2) Gremlins and power supply issues (I've seen it happen --- cd drive and cpu working simultaneously are too much for the power supply...).
However, I stress again that the install *did* work with 128 MB ram, being a clean install, having used the swap partition and on a minimum set of packages. Did after anaconda was satisfied with the performance of the cd drive, that is. :-)
Or maybe you should just try again and again and again until it works :-).
HTH, :-) Marko
Marko Vojinovic Institute of Physics University of Belgrade ====================== e-mail: vmarko@phy.bg.ac.yu
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:31:53 +0000 Marko Vojinovic vvmarko@panet.co.yu wrote:
Yup, you can even use the apps that are already installed. I heard from a friend (but not tried myself) that you can even watch a movie with mplayer during the install :-)
Can You find out how? In X?
I had the exact same behavior on a similar machine (700MHz, 128MB RAM) doing a clean install. On a dozen various attempts, anaconda just hanged at random points --- during "starting install process", or during installation of this or that package (mostly somwhere in the middle of the install). No matter graphical or text installation, no matter the selection of packages. The install media passed the check. The symptoms are always the same --- top shows anaconda is working 99%, hd is idle, everything else is waiting. Memtest ran ok for several hours before...
The time has come to kick out anaconda, is it?! Or to simplify it at least.
sean wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
128MB is pushing it for an update but it will find and use your swap so it ought to be ok. 36 hours on I'd have expected the system to have finished (and if not to be thrashing the disk like a lunatic trying to fit stuff in swap)
How much swap does the box have ?
There's a 1 gig swap partition. It's an old Gateway the I use without X, just cli, as an internal firewall, dhcp server, etc. I'd like to upgrade to keep all the little housekeeping settings I've made over the years.
I'm also surprised it's not disk trashing - that's what I expected. 36 hours might not be too long to actually install the packages.
But it never even started - no disk access light once the Package Installation screen came up.
It there any way to check if anaconda actually finds the swap partition ( Which shouldn't be hard - only one disk, swap is hda2 )?
Would installing the fedora-release rpms, and then yum upgrade be a better strategy?
sean
I had a problem in the past that was similar to what you described. The installer exited and left the system with a working shell. I was able to go into /mnt/sysimage/root and view the logs and do other activities in the environment. I was text installing with 256 MB of memory. I ended up getting additional memory which allowed me to get a decent installation. (added 512 MB more of memory). The bug was filed and I believe fixed for 256 MB, 128 MB might still show a similar failure.
Is it possible to add more memory to the computer?
If not, I think your proposal to install the fedora-release (and company for docs) package and doing a yum upgrade might work out for you. Just take into consideration that you'd want to get core system packages installed first which will probably pull in up the line packages that depend upon these important libraries and system utilities. Hotplug might be an issue since it was removed and packages depending upon hotplug might need to be upgraded to remove the dependency on hotplug of past package versions. It should be less time consuming vs. the 36 hour wait with no activity.
Jim
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 22:53 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:40:52 -0400 sean seandarcy2@gmail.com wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
That is really too little ram to do this.
sean seandarcy2@gmail.com writes:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
Any suggestions?
Move the disk to a more modern machine, do a clean install there. Update to current pkgs via yum update, then move the disk back to that old system. This is what I had to do when I installed FC6 onto a very old PPRO-150 w. 128Meg dram. The machine was way too old to be able to boot off of a CDROM, DVD or USB flash stick.
-wolfgang
sean wrote:
Upgrading to FC6, off a hard disk partition. Text install goes without error, until the Package Installation screen appears. There's a popup:
"starting install process. This may take several minutes..."
That was 36 hours ago!
No disk access lights flashing.
This is a slow old machine 400mz, 128meg ram, but it runs fc5.
Any suggestions?
sean
On my machine with 2 gig of ram, an upgrade took almost 7 hours. A clean install a few weeks later took less than 4 hours complete.
My point is that an upgrade takes much longer than a clean install.
-
Aaron Konstam -
Alan Cox -
Chris -
Chris Jones -
Ed Landaveri -
Goksin Akdeniz -
Jim Cornette -
Kam Leo -
Marko Vojinovic -
Rahul Sundaram -
Rick Stevens -
Robin Laing -
sean darcy -
Strong -
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht