Missing openssl library files?

[Temlakos]

Everyone:

Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it?

This is a fresh install of F27. I tried to build a program called MakeMKV.

Here's the output of the configure script:
> checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking target system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking how to print strings... printf
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
> checking for suffix of executables...
> checking whether we are cross compiling... no
> checking for suffix of object files... o
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
> checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
> checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep
> checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E
> checking for fgrep... /usr/bin/grep -F
> checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld
> checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
> checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B
> checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm
> checking whether ln -s works... yes
> checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 1572864
> checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes
> checking whether the shell understands "+="... yes
> checking how to convert x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu file names to 
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu format... func_convert_file_noop
> checking how to convert x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu file names to 
> toolchain format... func_convert_file_noop
> checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
> checking for objdump... objdump
> checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all
> checking for dlltool... no
> checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n
> checking for ar... ar
> checking for archiver @FILE support... @
> checking for strip... strip
> checking for ranlib... ranlib
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok
> checking for sysroot... no
> checking for mt... no
> checking if : is a manifest tool... no
> checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
> checking for ANSI C header files... yes
> checking for sys/types.h... yes
> checking for sys/stat.h... yes
> checking for stdlib.h... yes
> checking for string.h... yes
> checking for memory.h... yes
> checking for strings.h... yes
> checking for inttypes.h... yes
> checking for stdint.h... yes
> checking for unistd.h... yes
> checking for dlfcn.h... yes
> checking for objdir... .libs
> checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no
> checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
> checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
> checking if gcc static flag -static works... no
> checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
> checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
> checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports 
> shared libraries... yes
> checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no
> checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
> checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
> checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
> checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
> checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
> checking whether to build static libraries... no
> checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
> checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
> checking for g++... no
> checking for c++... no
> checking for gpp... no
> checking for aCC... no
> checking for CC... no
> checking for cxx... no
> checking for cc++... no
> checking for cl.exe... no
> checking for FCC... no
> checking for KCC... no
> checking for RCC... no
> checking for xlC_r... no
> checking for xlC... no
> checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no
> checking whether g++ accepts -g... no
> checking for -objcopy... no
> checking for objcopy... objcopy
> checking for -ld... /usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking zlib.h usability... yes
> checking zlib.h presence... yes
> checking for zlib.h... yes
> checking for compress2 in -lz... yes
> checking openssl/opensslconf.h usability... no
> checking openssl/opensslconf.h presence... no
> checking for openssl/opensslconf.h... no
> configure: error: in 
> `/home/Temlakos/Downloads/makemkv/makemkv-oss-1.10.8':
> configure: error: openssl library header files not found
> See `config.log' for more details

Any ideas?

Temlakos

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> Any ideas?

dnf install makemkv

poc

[Temlakos]

On 12/22/2017 11:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> dnf install makemkv
>
> poc
> _______________________________________________

"Error: unable to find a match."

MakeMKV is one of the Last of the Tarballs. In fact you need /two/ 
tarballs to put it together. For details:

https://www.makemkv.com/

For details on how you're supposed to install in on Linux systems, see:

http://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=224

For the record, back when I was using a Fedora that had seen upgrade 
after upgrade, I successfully installed it. But I needed to do a fresh 
install. And now I cannot "make" the program.

Temlakos

[Tom Horsley]

On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500
Temlakos wrote:
> Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it?

Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages
that contain the stuff you need to build code using those
libs (separate from just the libs needed to run already
built programs). For instance:

openssl-devel-1.1.0g-1.fc27.x86_64

[Tom Horsley]

On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:43:49 +0000
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> dnf install makemkv

There isn't a makemkv in either fedora or rpmfusion
repos for fedora 27.

[Temlakos]

On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500
> Temlakos wrote:
> > Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it?
>
> Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages
> that contain the stuff you need to build code using those
> libs (separate from just the libs needed to run already
> built programs). For instance:
>
> openssl-devel-1.1.0g-1.fc27.x86_64
> _______________________________________________

OK. I went through several cycles of installing -devel packages. The 
configure script finally worked.

But when I ran the make command, I got this output:
> mkdir -p out
> gcc -g -O2 -D_linux_  -D_REENTRANT -shared -Wl,-z,defs 
> -oout/libdriveio.so.0.full -I./libdriveio/inc 
> libdriveio/src/infolist.cpp libdriveio/src/scsihlp.cpp 
> libdriveio/src/srlist.cpp libdriveio/src/stdquery.cpp 
> libdriveio/src/tipclient.cpp libdriveio/src/tipcommon.cpp 
> libdriveio/src/tipserver.cpp libdriveio/src/drives/pioneer.cpp 
> libdriveio/src/drives/xboxhddvd.cpp \
> -fPIC -Xlinker -dy -Xlinker 
> --version-script=libdriveio/src/libdriveio.vers \
> -Xlinker -soname=libdriveio.so.0 -lc -lstdc++
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> make: *** [Makefile:69: out/libdriveio.so.0.full] Error 1

Now what?

Temlakos

[Rick Stevens]

On 12/22/2017 09:24 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500
> > Temlakos wrote:
> > > Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it?
> >
> > Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages
> > that contain the stuff you need to build code using those
> > libs (separate from just the libs needed to run already
> > built programs). For instance:
> >
> > openssl-devel-1.1.0g-1.fc27.x86_64
> > _______________________________________________
>
> OK. I went through several cycles of installing -devel packages. The
> configure script finally worked.
>
> But when I ran the make command, I got this output:
> > mkdir -p out
> > gcc -g -O2 -D_linux_  -D_REENTRANT -shared -Wl,-z,defs
> > -oout/libdriveio.so.0.full -I./libdriveio/inc
> > libdriveio/src/infolist.cpp libdriveio/src/scsihlp.cpp
> > libdriveio/src/srlist.cpp libdriveio/src/stdquery.cpp
> > libdriveio/src/tipclient.cpp libdriveio/src/tipcommon.cpp
> > libdriveio/src/tipserver.cpp libdriveio/src/drives/pioneer.cpp
> > libdriveio/src/drives/xboxhddvd.cpp \
> > -fPIC -Xlinker -dy -Xlinker
> > --version-script=libdriveio/src/libdriveio.vers \
> > -Xlinker -soname=libdriveio.so.0 -lc -lstdc++
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > make: *** [Makefile:69: out/libdriveio.so.0.full] Error 1
>
> Now what?

Install gcc-c++. It's C++ you're trying to compile (as shown by the
".cpp" suffix).

You could also do "dnf whatprovides */cc1plus" to get a list of what
RPMs provide that program. You'll get a batch of them, but for native
compiles, just use "dnf install gcc-c++".

Happy Holidays!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital    [e-mail] -
- AIM/Skype: therps2        ICQ: 22643734            Yahoo: origrps2 -
-                                                                    -
-     Blessed be the peacekeepers, for they shall be shot at from    -
-                            both sides.                             -
-                                            -- A.M. Greeley         -
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[Temlakos]

On 12/22/2017 12:35 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 09:24 AM, Temlakos wrote:
> > On 12/22/2017 11:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 11:36:44 -0500
> > > Temlakos wrote:
> > > > Anyone ever run into this? And how to fix it?
> > >
> > > Virtually everything in fedora has separate *-devel packages
> > > that contain the stuff you need to build code using those
> > > libs (separate from just the libs needed to run already
> > > built programs). For instance:
> > >
> > > openssl-devel-1.1.0g-1.fc27.x86_64
> > > _______________________________________________
> >
> > OK. I went through several cycles of installing -devel packages. The
> > configure script finally worked.
> >
> > But when I ran the make command, I got this output:
> > > mkdir -p out
> > > gcc -g -O2 -D_linux_  -D_REENTRANT -shared -Wl,-z,defs
> > > -oout/libdriveio.so.0.full -I./libdriveio/inc
> > > libdriveio/src/infolist.cpp libdriveio/src/scsihlp.cpp
> > > libdriveio/src/srlist.cpp libdriveio/src/stdquery.cpp
> > > libdriveio/src/tipclient.cpp libdriveio/src/tipcommon.cpp
> > > libdriveio/src/tipserver.cpp libdriveio/src/drives/pioneer.cpp
> > > libdriveio/src/drives/xboxhddvd.cpp \
> > > -fPIC -Xlinker -dy -Xlinker
> > > --version-script=libdriveio/src/libdriveio.vers \
> > > -Xlinker -soname=libdriveio.so.0 -lc -lstdc++
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory
> > > make: *** [Makefile:69: out/libdriveio.so.0.full] Error 1
> >
> > Now what?
>
> Install gcc-c++. It's C++ you're trying to compile (as shown by the
> ".cpp" suffix).
>
> You could also do "dnf whatprovides */cc1plus" to get a list of what
> RPMs provide that program. You'll get a batch of them, but for native
> compiles, just use "dnf install gcc-c++".
>
> Happy Holidays!

Success.

Thank you all.

Temlakos

[Richard Shaw]

Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Temlakos  wrote:
> checking openssl/opensslconf.h usability... no
> > checking openssl/opensslconf.h presence... no
> > checking for openssl/opensslconf.h... no
> > configure: error: in `/home/Temlakos/Downloads/make
> > mkv/makemkv-oss-1.10.8':
> > configure: error: openssl library header files not found
> > See `config.log' for more details

I've had to use compat-openssl10-devel since Fedora 26 for makemkv.

Also, if you're going to be building your own software I would recommend:

# dnf groupinstall "Development Tools"

Thanks,
Richard

[Temlakos]

On 12/22/2017 01:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Temlakos <[e-mail] 
> > wrote:
>     checking openssl/opensslconf.h usability... no
>     checking openssl/opensslconf.h presence... no
>     checking for openssl/opensslconf.h... no
>     configure: error: in
>     `/home/Temlakos/Downloads/makemkv/makemkv-oss-1.10.8':
>     configure: error: openssl library header files not found
>     See `config.log' for more details
>
>
> I've had to use compat-openssl10-devel since Fedora 26 for makemkv.
>
> Also, if you're going to be building your own software I would recommend:
>
> # dnf groupinstall "Development Tools"
>
> Thanks,
> Richard

How do I get a list of the groups dnf recognizes? That kind of group 
installation would solve a lot of problems. Heretofore, it has been 
available as a GUI only, and then only on initial installation of the 
OS. To be able to do it on the fly...!

Temlakos

[Richard Shaw]

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Temlakos  wrote:
> How do I get a list of the groups dnf recognizes? That kind of group
> installation would solve a lot of problems. Heretofore, it has been
> available as a GUI only, and then only on initial installation of the OS.
> To be able to do it on the fly...!

They are all prefixed with "group" so

grouplist
groupinstall
grouperase

etc.

Richard

[Rick Stevens]

On 12/22/2017 10:26 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Temlakos <[e-mail]
> > wrote:
> How do I get a list of the groups dnf recognizes? That kind of group
> installation would solve a lot of problems. Heretofore, it has been
> available as a GUI only, and then only on initial installation of
> the OS. To be able to do it on the fly...!
>
>
> They are all prefixed with "group" so
>
> grouplist
> groupinstall
> grouperase
>
> etc.

For example:

sudo dnf groupinstall "Development Tools"
or
    sudo dnf groupinstall 'Network Servers'

Note that many of the groups have embedded spaces in their names, so
when you use them, enclose the names in single or double quotes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital    [e-mail] -
- AIM/Skype: therps2        ICQ: 22643734            Yahoo: origrps2 -
-                                                                    -
-      "Microsoft is a cross between The Borg and the Ferengi.       -
-  Unfortunately they use Borg to do their marketing and Ferengi to  -
-               do their programming."  -- Simon Slavin              -
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[Todd Zullinger]

Rick Stevens wrote:
> For example:
>
> sudo dnf groupinstall "Development Tools"
> or
>    sudo dnf groupinstall 'Network Servers'
>
> Note that many of the groups have embedded spaces in their names, so
> when you use them, enclose the names in single or double quotes.

Also FWIW, you can get the names without spaces adding -v to
the group list command (--hidden is another useful option if
exploring groups):

sudo dnf group list -v

Then group names in parentheses can be used without quoting,
if that's preferable.

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:49 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> On 12/22/2017 11:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:36 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > dnf install makemkv
> >
> > poc
> > _______________________________________________
>
> "Error: unable to find a match."

I forgot you need to enable the Negativo17 repo:

$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-multimedia.repo
[fedora-multimedia]
name=negativo17 - Multimedia
baseurl=http://negativo17.org/repos/multimedia/fedora-$releasever/$base
arch/
enabled=1
skip_if_unavailable=1
gpgkey=http://negativo17.org/repos/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh
gpgcheck=1
enabled_metadata=1

[fedora-multimedia-source]
name=negativo17 - Multimedia - Source
baseurl=http://negativo17.org/repos/multimedia/fedora-$releasever/SRPMS
enabled=0
skip_if_unavailable=1
gpgkey=http://negativo17.org/repos/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh
gpgcheck=1
enabled_metadata=1

poc

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 11:51 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:43:49 +0000
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > dnf install makemkv
>
> There isn't a makemkv in either fedora or rpmfusion
> repos for fedora 27.

It's in the Negativo17 repo, see separate reply.

poc