I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34.
Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 - libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides selinux-policy >= 34.3-1.fc34 needed by libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc34.x86_64
dnf sees the .fc34 package, but then claims no knowledge of "selinux-policy
= 34.3-1.fc34".
I see selinux-policy-34.3-1.fc34.noarch.rpm in updates, and with specifying --allowerasing results in my local packages getting uninstalled, and the selinux-policy updated normally. This one has me stumped.
On 5/3/21 4:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34.
Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 - libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides selinux-policy >= 34.3-1.fc34 needed by libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc34.x86_64
Is that the complete list of problems?
dnf sees the .fc34 package, but then claims no knowledge of "selinux-policy
= 34.3-1.fc34".
I see selinux-policy-34.3-1.fc34.noarch.rpm in updates, and with specifying --allowerasing results in my local packages getting uninstalled, and the selinux-policy updated normally. This one has me stumped.
"libcxxbase-selinux" is not a Fedora package and the version on the current package is very strange. I wonder if dnf is having a problem with that somehow.
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 5/3/21 4:28 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm trying to update a system that has some locally-built packages. They get installed from a local repository. I rebuilt all the packages in mock for F34.
Problem 1: problem with installed package libcxxbase- selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 - libcxxbase-selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc33.20210503063931.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides selinux-policy >= 34.3-1.fc34 needed by libcxxbase- selinux-0.23.0.20210503-1.fc34.x86_64
Is that the complete list of problems?
Yes, it was.
dnf sees the .fc34 package, but then claims no knowledge of "selinux-policy
= 34.3-1.fc34".
I see selinux-policy-34.3-1.fc34.noarch.rpm in updates, and with specifying --allowerasing results in my local packages getting uninstalled, and the selinux-policy updated normally. This one has me stumped.
"libcxxbase-selinux" is not a Fedora package and the version on the current package is very strange. I wonder if dnf is having a problem with that somehow.
I mentioned that I have some locally-built packages and a local repository that they get pulled from, and they have all been rebuilt for F34 in mock.
Only after I sifted through the documentation, used --debugsolver, and picked my way through that trash pile that I discovered that a different local repository, the one that mirrors fedora updates, was the one with a configuration problem which occured after I already built everything in mock. So, mock had all dependencies installed, but I couldn't launch an upgrade because of the broken dependencies. Well, it's fixed now…
-
Sam Varshavchik -
Samuel Sieb