I have just upgraded two different machines to F21.
I dutifully went through all the clean-up steps afterward. I also kept an Ethernet connection during the boot-to-system-upgrade step. The fedup program took a downgrade, and yes, I have to remove Google Chrome and then re-install it to get the F21 build. All as the fedup page told me to expect.
(And, no, I did /not/ lose wireless connectivity. When I pulled the Ethernet plug on each system, its wireless adapter immediately found my router and re-established the connection I had set up earlier.)
This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages for F21 were not ready.
What do I wait for next? Will my systems, once RPMfusion "pushes" those packages, be able to see them and update the system?
Thanks in advance.
Temlakos
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages for F21 were not ready.
That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
Do you refer to the rpmfusion.org web page? Or a specific error?
The repository for F21 is available:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/ -> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/x86_64/...
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages for F21 were not ready.
That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
Do you refer to the rpmfusion.org web page? Or a specific error?
The repository for F21 is available:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/ -> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/x86_64/...
I confirm I successfully use rpmfusion in Fedora 21. The repo is available at least since a week.
However, be aware that some package are still labeled as fc19 and you get an error if you try to install it. For instance 'gmameui':
$ sudo yum install gmameui Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package gmameui.x86_64 0:0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libzip.so.2()(64bit) for package: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgtkimageview.so.0()(64bit) for package: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package gtkimageview.x86_64 0:1.6.4-10.fc21 will be installed ---> Package libzip.x86_64 0:0.11.2-3.fc21 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution
Downloading packages: warning: /var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/rpmfusion-nonfree/packages/gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID b5f29883: NOKEY Retrieving key from file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-21
The GPG keys listed for the "RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.
Failing package is: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-21
Cheers,
-- Marco
On 12/18/2014 06:01 AM, Marco Guazzone wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:20:06 -0500, Temlakos wrote:
This no one told me to expect: it said the RPMfusion non-free packages for F21 were not ready.
That's very vague. Care to expand on it?
Do you refer to the rpmfusion.org web page? Or a specific error?
The repository for F21 is available:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/ -> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/nonfree/fedora/releases/21/Everything/x86_64/...
I confirm I successfully use rpmfusion in Fedora 21. The repo is available at least since a week.
However, be aware that some package are still labeled as fc19 and you get an error if you try to install it. For instance 'gmameui':
$ sudo yum install gmameui Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package gmameui.x86_64 0:0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libzip.so.2()(64bit) for package: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libgtkimageview.so.0()(64bit) for package: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package gtkimageview.x86_64 0:1.6.4-10.fc21 will be installed ---> Package libzip.x86_64 0:0.11.2-3.fc21 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution
Downloading packages: warning: /var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/rpmfusion-nonfree/packages/gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID b5f29883: NOKEY Retrieving key from file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-21
The GPG keys listed for the "RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package. Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.
Failing package is: gmameui-0.2.13-0.4.20120704cvs.fc19.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-21
Cheers,
-- Marco
I refer to a warning message when fedup first ran: something about no new packages being installed on RPMfusion-nonfree.
Since then I have not seen any further warnings or errors relating to that rather puzzling message.
Temlakos
The most irritating thing I note that's missing is the akmod-nvidia-340xx package these instructions claim I can use:
http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
I've got a relatively new maxwell nvidia card, and I suspect I need this driver to get 3D working.
Also the table on the rpmfusion home page for browsing packages still doesn't have any rows for fedora 21.
On 18 December 2014 at 16:42, Tom Horsley horsley1953@gmail.com wrote:
The most irritating thing I note that's missing is the akmod-nvidia-340xx package these instructions claim I can use:
It's there: $ yum list akmod-nvidia*34* Loaded plugins: changelog, tsflags Available Packages akmod-nvidia.x86_64 1:343.22-4.fc21 rpmfusion-nonfree
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:10:28 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote:
1:343.22-4.fc21
343 is different than 340 (I don't understand nvidia's naming conventions, but 343 is apparently some sort of "test" version, whereas 340 is the production version - or something like that). Only the 340 claims full support for geforce8/9.
On 20 December 2014 at 16:29, Tom Horsley horsley1953@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:10:28 +0200 Ahmad Samir wrote:
1:343.22-4.fc21
343 is different than 340 (I don't understand nvidia's naming conventions, but 343 is apparently some sort of "test" version, whereas 340 is the production version - or something like that). Only the 340 claims full support for geforce8/9.
Check these pages: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/533434/linux/current-graphics-drive... http://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/80145