/etc/bash_completion.d/conda is missing

[Hiisi]

Hello, list!
After running `conda init` each time I open a new terminal window I have
this message at the very first line:
bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/conda: No such file or directory
(base) [hiisi@localhost ~] $
Indeed, there's no such file. Which package provides that?
Thanks.

[Matthew Miller]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Hiisi wrote:
> Hello, list!
> After running `conda init` each time I open a new terminal window I have
> this message at the very first line:
> bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/conda: No such file or directory
> (base) [hiisi@localhost ~] $
> Indeed, there's no such file. Which package provides that?
> Thanks.

`dnf repoquery --whatprovides /etc/bash_completion.d/conda` returns no
results, which means no package in the Fedora distribution provides that.

[Hiisi]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:56 AM Matthew Miller
 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:22:12AM -0500, Hiisi wrote:
> > Hello, list!
> > After running `conda init` each time I open a new terminal window I have
> > this message at the very first line:
> > bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/conda: No such file or directory
> > (base) [hiisi@localhost ~] $
> > Indeed, there's no such file. Which package provides that?
> > Thanks.
>
> `dnf repoquery --whatprovides /etc/bash_completion.d/conda` returns no
> results, which means no package in the Fedora distribution provides that.

Thank you, Matthew. I was trying to query dnf before posting with the
same results. Shall I report a bug with fedora bug tracker on with
conda folks?
Best regards

[Matthew Miller]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:00:43PM -0500, Hiisi wrote:
> > `dnf repoquery --whatprovides /etc/bash_completion.d/conda` returns no
> > results, which means no package in the Fedora distribution provides that.
>
> Thank you, Matthew. I was trying to query dnf before posting with the
> same results. Shall I report a bug with fedora bug tracker on with
> conda folks?

Yep!

[Todd Zullinger]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:00:43PM -0500, Hiisi wrote:
> > > `dnf repoquery --whatprovides /etc/bash_completion.d/conda` returns no
> > > results, which means no package in the Fedora distribution provides that.
> >
> > Thank you, Matthew. I was trying to query dnf before posting with the
> > same results. Shall I report a bug with fedora bug tracker on with
> > conda folks?
>
> Yep!

I'd probably start with a Fedora bug.  It looks like the
conda tarball contains the bash_completion.d file¹, but it's
not installed with the package.  So either that should be
fixed (or if there's a reason to not include the file, then
conda should be patched so init doesn't try to reference
that file).

A further improvement might be for upstream to use the
preferred location for completions via:

pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-completion

¹ conda/shell/etc/bash_completion.d/conda in the current
  conda-4.8.0 tarball.

[Hiisi]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:13 PM Todd Zullinger  wrote:
>

<--SNIP-->
> I'd probably start with a Fedora bug.  It looks like the
> conda tarball contains the bash_completion.d file¹, but it's
> not installed with the package.  So either that should be
> fixed (or if there's a reason to not include the file, then
> conda should be patched so init doesn't try to reference
> that file).
>
> A further improvement might be for upstream to use the
> preferred location for completions via:
> pkg-config --variable=completionsdir bash-completion
>
> ¹ conda/shell/etc/bash_completion.d/conda in the current
>   conda-4.8.0 tarball.
>
> --
> Todd
> _______________________________________________

Thanks, Todd! The bug has been submitted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791068

[Hiisi]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:12 PM Hiisi  wrote:
> > ¹ conda/shell/etc/bash_completion.d/conda in the current
> >   conda-4.8.0 tarball.
> >
> > --
> > Todd
> > _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks, Todd! The bug has been submitted:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791068

The issue got resolved at updates-testing. Thanks everyone.

[Todd Zullinger]

Hiisi wrote:
> > Thanks, Todd! The bug has been submitted:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791068
>
> The issue got resolved at updates-testing. Thanks everyone.

Excellent!  It's always nice to see a quick fix from a bug
report.

Thank you for filing it and to Orion for taking care of it
(I've never met Orion, but he's always been very good at
fixing up bugs in the packages he maintains -- and even
those he doesn't.)