Bugzilla filing

[Charles Curley]

Some questions on Bugzilla.

Background: I have something I'd like to file against severn (ISO
image files dated Jul 18). When I set up kickstart to install the
Office/Productivity group ("@ Office/Productivity"), and then exclude
OpenOffice.org ("-openoffice"), I still get two other OOo RPMs,
openoffice-i18n and openoffice-libs. They have no reason to be
installed other than OOo, so they should also be excluded.

* Do I file on Red Hat's bugzilla or fedora's?

* Red Hat's Bugzilla "version" field has no entry for severn. Which
  version do I file it under?

* Should I use "openoffice" or "installation" in the component field?

(There are no doubt other packages I could similarly do without, but
at 230 MB for the pair, on a testbed computer with a 2 GB drive,
that's egregious.)

[Michael Schwendt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:55:43 -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> Some questions on Bugzilla.
>
> Background: I have something I'd like to file against severn (ISO
> image files dated Jul 18). When I set up kickstart to install the
> Office/Productivity group ("@ Office/Productivity"), and then exclude
> OpenOffice.org ("-openoffice"), I still get two other OOo RPMs,
> openoffice-i18n and openoffice-libs. They have no reason to be
> installed other than OOo, so they should also be excluded.
> Do I file on Red Hat's bugzilla or fedora's?

File bug reports about Severn at https://bugzilla.redhat.com

The other bugzilla site, bugzilla.fedora.us, is only for the
add-on packages provided by fedora.us.

There hasn't been a merger yet.
> Red Hat's Bugzilla "version" field has no entry for severn. Which
> version do I file it under?

Red Hat Linux Beta
beta1
i386
> Should I use "openoffice" or "installation" in the component field?

I'd start with "anaconda" (the installer) which covers the package
lists, too. Whether those two packages get included due to
dependencies, I don't know.

- -- 
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/cwMi0iMVcrivHFQRAve/AJ9xkx9RiBYLtcJJv+b3wzwmjV+dbQCfSr6q
> DsAzp0u7w5fXH7lsSi4pbG8=
> =3c03
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Michael Lee Yohe]

> Do I file on Red Hat's bugzilla or fedora's?

Red Hat Bugzilla.
> Red Hat's Bugzilla "version" field has no entry for severn. Which
> version do I file it under?

Choose the product as "Red Hat Linux Beta" - Severn was a beta Linux
product release.
> Should I use "openoffice" or "installation" in the component field?

This may be an problem with the dependencies of the openoffice-*-1.0.2
packages.  But this should be clarified if you report the bug on
"installation" or "Anaconda".