Firefox 89?

[Neal Becker]

I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
I'm on F34.
Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:

sudo dnf --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
I
Dependencies resolved.
=================================================================================================
 Package              Architecture        Version
Repository            Size
=================================================================================================
Upgrading:
 firefox              x86_64              89.0-1.fc35
rawhide              103 M

Transaction Summary
=================================================================================================
Upgrade  1 Package

Total download size: 103 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm                                   6.0
MB/s | 103 MB     00:17
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                            5.9
MB/s | 103 MB     00:17
warning: /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm:
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9867c58f: NOKEY
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora re 796
kB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00
GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-x86_64
(0x45719A39) is already installed
Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora re 1.6
MB/s | 1.6 kB     00:00
Importing GPG key 0x38AB71F4:
 Userid     : "Fedora (36) "
 Fingerprint: 53DE D2CB 922D 8B8D 9E63 FD18 999F 7CBF 38AB 71F4
 From       : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-36-x86_64
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Key imported successfully
Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
Public key for firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed.
Failing package is: firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64
 GPG Keys are configured as:
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-x86_64,
file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-36-x86_64
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: GPG check FAILED

I don't think I want to install if gpg check failed.

[Alex Gurenko]

I guess there were a lot of problems building it so it's not in updates-testing just yet, but I've grabbed artifacts from a successful build [0] few days ago and it's working perfectly fine for me.

[0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1757216

---
Best regards, Alex

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Monday, June 7th, 2021 at 17:58, Neal Becker  wrote:
> I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
>
> I'm on F34.
>
> Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing. Let's try rawhide:
>
> sudo dnf --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox
>
> I
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Package Architecture Version
> Repository Size
>
> Upgrading:
>
> firefox x86_64 89.0-1.fc35
>
> rawhide 103 M
> Transaction Summary
>
> Upgrade 1 Package
>
> Total download size: 103 M
>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>
> Downloading Packages:
>
> firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm 6.0
> MB/s | 103 MB 00:17
>
> Total 5.9
>
> MB/s | 103 MB 00:17
>
> warning: /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm:
>
> Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9867c58f: NOKEY
>
> Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora re 796
>
> kB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00
>
> GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-x86_64
>
> (0x45719A39) is already installed
>
> Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora re 1.6
>
> MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00
>
> Importing GPG key 0x38AB71F4:
>
> Userid : "Fedora (36) [e-mail]"
>
> Fingerprint: 53DE D2CB 922D 8B8D 9E63 FD18 999F 7CBF 38AB 71F4
>
> From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-36-x86_64
>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
>
> Key imported successfully
>
> Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?
>
> Public key for firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed.
>
> Failing package is: firefox-89.0-1.fc35.x86_64
>
> GPG Keys are configured as:
>
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-x86_64,
>
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-36-x86_64
>
> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful
>
> transaction.
>
> You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
>
> Error: GPG check FAILED
>
> I don't think I want to install if gpg check failed.
>
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Qiyu Yan]

在 2021-06-07星期一的 11:58 -0400，Neal Becker写道：
> I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
> I'm on F34.
> Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:

Usually installing a rawhide package in f34 is not a good idea, if you
want to test the new firefox package before it gets pushed into
testing, you can download via koji[1].

[1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1757216
>

[Stephen Morris]

On 8/6/21 02:03, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> 在 2021-06-07星期一的 11:58 -0400，Neal Becker写道：
> > I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
> > I'm on F34.
> > Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:
>
> Usually installing a rawhide package in f34 is not a good idea, if you
> want to test the new firefox package before it gets pushed into
> testing, you can download via koji[1].

Just a suggestion, if you want to try the latest version of firefox, I 
use the nightly version of firefox (I use this in linux and windows) 
downloaded from the upstream website and installed into /opt. It can be 
easily found via a google search. The nightly version of firefox is V91.

regards,
Steve
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Neal Becker]

Any idea why gpg check failed?

BTW, when I occasionally try a rawhide package on F34 (for example), I
would avoid it if the update drags in other libraries that may cause
problems.  In this case the install was firefox only, so that seems
safe to me.

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:47 AM Stephen Morris  wrote:
> On 8/6/21 02:03, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> > 在 2021-06-07星期一的 11:58 -0400，Neal Becker写道：
> > > I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
> > > I'm on F34.
> > > Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:
> >
> > Usually installing a rawhide package in f34 is not a good idea, if you
> > want to test the new firefox package before it gets pushed into
> > testing, you can download via koji[1].
>
> Just a suggestion, if you want to try the latest version of firefox, I
> use the nightly version of firefox (I use this in linux and windows)
> downloaded from the upstream website and installed into /opt. It can be
> easily found via a google search. The nightly version of firefox is V91.
>
> regards,
> Steve
> > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Stephen Morris]

On 8/6/21 21:33, Neal Becker wrote:
> Any idea why gpg check failed?
>
> BTW, when I occasionally try a rawhide package on F34 (for example), I
> would avoid it if the update drags in other libraries that may cause
> problems.  In this case the install was firefox only, so that seems
> safe to me.

The only thing I could think of is maybe the firefox package has been 
built with a different key to the standard rawhide key, so it may need 
to be rebuilt, but I would be only guessing.

regards,
Steve
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:47 AM Stephen Morris  wrote:
> > On 8/6/21 02:03, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> > > 在 2021-06-07星期一的 11:58 -0400，Neal Becker写道：
> > > > I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
> > > > I'm on F34.
> > > > Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:
> > >
> > > Usually installing a rawhide package in f34 is not a good idea, if you
> > > want to test the new firefox package before it gets pushed into
> > > testing, you can download via koji[1].
> >
> > Just a suggestion, if you want to try the latest version of firefox, I
> > use the nightly version of firefox (I use this in linux and windows)
> > downloaded from the upstream website and installed into /opt. It can be
> > easily found via a google search. The nightly version of firefox is V91.
> >
> > regards,
> > Steve
> > > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> >
> > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Neal Becker]

In the end I installed from flatpak, which has version 89.

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 8:53 AM Stephen Morris  wrote:
> On 8/6/21 21:33, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Any idea why gpg check failed?
> >
> > BTW, when I occasionally try a rawhide package on F34 (for example), I
> > would avoid it if the update drags in other libraries that may cause
> > problems.  In this case the install was firefox only, so that seems
> > safe to me.
>
> The only thing I could think of is maybe the firefox package has been
> built with a different key to the standard rawhide key, so it may need
> to be rebuilt, but I would be only guessing.
>
> regards,
> Steve
> > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 6:47 AM Stephen Morris  wrote:
> > > On 8/6/21 02:03, Qiyu Yan wrote:
> > > > 在 2021-06-07星期一的 11:58 -0400，Neal Becker写道：
> > > > > I've been reading about firefox 89 and wanted to check it out.
> > > > > I'm on F34.
> > > > > Doesn't seem to be in updates-testing.  Let's try rawhide:
> > > >
> > > > Usually installing a rawhide package in f34 is not a good idea, if you
> > > > want to test the new firefox package before it gets pushed into
> > > > testing, you can download via koji[1].
> > >
> > > Just a suggestion, if you want to try the latest version of firefox, I
> > > use the nightly version of firefox (I use this in linux and windows)
> > > downloaded from the upstream website and installed into /opt. It can be
> > > easily found via a google search. The nightly version of firefox is V91.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Steve
> > > > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> > >
> > > users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure