Hello all. I have just looked at the rawhide x86_64-fedora tree and saw that the x86_64_kernel is pretty dated. I am running a VIA K8T800 chipset with AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and 1 gig of ram. I was going to net install using that bootable .iso but I am concerned about that fedora kernel being from April 2003 (most all other packages are from Nov27th 2003). Are there any plans for Fedora Core 64, is there a wait until the 2.6 kernel makes it out (hopefully this month).. Any feedback would be appreciated. btw: Fedora's desktop is the best that I have used. Looking forward working with this project. My 32 bit machine is happily running Fedora with no problems.
Justin M. Forbes 64bit_fedora@comcast.net wrote:
http://fedora.linux.duke.edu/fc1_x86_64/
Stephen Varga wrote:
Hello all. I have just looked at the rawhide x86_64-fedora tree and saw that the x86_64_kernel is pretty dated. I am running a VIA K8T800 chipset with AMD Athlon 64 3200+ and 1 gig of ram. I was going to net install using that bootable .iso but I am concerned about that fedora kernel being from April 2003 (most all other packages are from Nov27th 2003). Are there any plans for Fedora Core 64, is there a wait until the 2.6 kernel makes it out (hopefully this month).. Any feedback would be appreciated. btw: Fedora's desktop is the best that I have used. Looking forward working with this project. My 32 bit machine is happily running Fedora with no problems.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 01:48, Stephen Varga wrote:
Hello all. I have just looked at the rawhide x86_64-fedora tree and saw that the x86_64_kernel is pretty dated.
http://people.redhat.com/davej/amd64/
Dave
-
Aron Rubin -
Dave Jones -
Stephen Varga