On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:17:10PM -0400, William Hooper wrote:
Jeff Lasman said: [snip]
If my control panels were available for, and supported under, RHEL, I'd probably find myself doing just what you're doing, especially we have local support for creating complete RH-compatible operating systems.
[snip]
It sounds like your main problem is your control panel vendors, not RHEL.
You might consider buying a copy of RHEL and giving it a try. RHEL 2.1 is almost identical to RHL 7.x in its included packages and their versions, and RHEL 3.0 will be based on RHL 9 (+ updates and the extra stuff. OK, this is over-simplified, but you may give it a try, chances are it will work.
David Jansen
On Friday 24 October 2003 08:07, David Jansen wrote:
You might consider buying a copy of RHEL and giving it a try. RHEL 2.1 is almost identical to RHL 7.x in its included packages and their versions, and RHEL 3.0 will be based on RHL 9 (+ updates and the extra stuff. OK, this is over-simplified, but you may give it a try, chances are it will work.
Good idea on the face of it.
But even if it would work today, if it broke tomorrow or the next day and I had a few hundred to a few thousand domains not working I'd call the control panel vendor and s/he'd say "Sorry, not supported".
Maybe you'd be willing to take that chance for yourself. Maybe I'd be willing to take that chance for myself.
I'm certainlyl not willing to take that chance for my customers.
Jeff
-
David Jansen -
Jeff Lasman