Is there an easy way to add MP3 to rhythmbox? ...and this version of XMMS?
I have Fedora Test 2.
Thanks, Kreg
Rob, thanks for the reply... hoever I did know about that repository, I was wondering what packages I needed to install for rhythmbox...and XMMS is now 1.2.8
Kreg
Rob Myers wrote:
kreg-
check http://rpm.livna.org from the readme.txt:
"According to fedora.us, the merger between fedora and redhat necessitated the removal of certain problematic packages due to licensing issues.
rpm.livna.org repositories contain those packages, and are apt/yum enabled."
good luck
rob.
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 11:40, Kreg Steppe wrote:
Is there an easy way to add MP3 to rhythmbox? ...and this version of XMMS?
I have Fedora Test 2.
Thanks, Kreg
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Well, I forced the xmms-mpg-1.2.7 and it worked. I just wanted to tryout Rhythm Box. My Archos is full of MP3s, that is why I want to play that format. I wish I could convert my Archos to play OGG. But the guys over at Rockbox dont see that happenin'
Kreg
Michael Schwendt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:39:30 -0400, Kreg Steppe wrote:
Rob, thanks for the reply... hoever I did know about that repository, I was wondering what packages I needed to install for rhythmbox...and XMMS is now 1.2.8
Known issue. But with limited human resources it's not easily possible to put out timely add-on packages. Removal of some of the packages from fedora.us has increased the workload a lot for some important packagers as they work on setting up missing infrastructure.
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/dIIh0iMVcrivHFQRAgerAJ0XqxVFHBkbVwlMn5BWApcClTh7UACghXQD YPhNyiUk7W7I/7z5EKxVj3M= =747K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
kreg-
check http://rpm.livna.org from the readme.txt:
"According to fedora.us, the merger between fedora and redhat necessitated the removal of certain problematic packages due to licensing issues.
rpm.livna.org repositories contain those packages, and are apt/yum enabled."
good luck
rob.
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 11:40, Kreg Steppe wrote:
Is there an easy way to add MP3 to rhythmbox? ...and this version of XMMS?
I have Fedora Test 2.
Thanks, Kreg
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:39:30 -0400, Kreg Steppe wrote:
Rob, thanks for the reply... hoever I did know about that repository, I was wondering what packages I needed to install for rhythmbox...and XMMS is now 1.2.8
Known issue. But with limited human resources it's not easily possible to put out timely add-on packages. Removal of some of the packages from fedora.us has increased the workload a lot for some important packagers as they work on setting up missing infrastructure.
- -- Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
Kreg Steppe wrote:
Is there an easy way to add MP3 to rhythmbox? ...and this version of XMMS?
I have Fedora Test 2.
Anyone tried building the SRPM from freshrpms.net? I realize it's 1.2.7, however :-/ Perhaps we'll have to wait until they post a 1.2.8 and go from there.
-Rick
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 13:14, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
What about hijacked Threads? These are really starting to piss me off for some reason.
Bret
Bret Hughes wrote:
...
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
What about hijacked Threads? These are really starting to piss me off for some reason.
Just kidding. :-)
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:25:38 +1000, you wrote:
Bret Hughes wrote:
...
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
What about hijacked Threads? These are really starting to piss me off for some reason.
Just kidding. :-)
Paul http://paulgear.webhop.net
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. AND we need to be able to reference the reply to previously quoted text. One can find a thorough explanation and reasoning of this matter at http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/nquote.html Hint: Usenet Newsgroups are very similar to mailing list, in many ways.
BTW, I'm just trying to ad some addition reference here, for use by those who have been on the Internet for some time to share with those who have not (including those who know no other than MSOE).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 27 Sep 2003 00:00:20 -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.
What about hijacked Threads? These are really starting to piss me off for some reason.
Sure, they are an annoyance, too. Often I "collapse threads" (it is called like that in Sylpheed's menu) which means, I don't see messages which were sent with a modified subject line as a reply to an existing thread. Only when I go through all new messages in a mail folder with the "Next" button/key, I see them.
But hijacked thread are due to mail clients hiding technical details from the user, whereas badly formatted messages are just plain rude.
Complete quotes, top posts and badly formatted messages are worse. Especially when it doesn't become clear which part of a message the quote is and which the reply. Or when a top reply refers to minor bits of a large quote at the bottom and one would need to read everything again to get the necessary context. This is beyond everyone's time, I guess, except if someone follows only a very small portion of the list traffic.
- --
-
Bill Nottingham -
Bret Hughes -
Dennis Calhoun -
Kreg Steppe -
Michael Schwendt -
Paul Gear -
Rick Johnson -
Rob Myers