My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:31:47AM -0500, Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
While it may be possib le toi nstall FC6 or 7 on such a machine, it would be very tight for disk space, very SLOOOOOOWWWWW, and overall painful to use.
You may want to look at small distributions like Puppy Linux or DSL (Damn Small Linux).
I put knoppix on my PIII/366 laptop with 128M RAM and it is usable. DSL would also be a good choice. From my experience, Fedora is too heavy, but a while back there was the RULE project to install/run it on small footprint systems.
Cheers, -- Wade Hampton
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:35 -0400, fredex wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:31:47AM -0500, Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
While it may be possib le toi nstall FC6 or 7 on such a machine, it would be very tight for disk space,
No. The critical component would be memory (RAM), not diskspace.
very SLOOOOOOWWWWW, and overall painful to use.
Open office will always be painful on with such little RAM ;)
Ralf
Looks like it'll be painful to use FC in this laptop? Even for bare minimum install and then just add KDE?
Alternatively, I've had great experience with lean Slackware installations, except that it takes more effort to get things up to date. Usually just FTP download the updates and manually installing them.
On 3/28/07, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:35 -0400, fredex wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:31:47AM -0500, Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
While it may be possib le toi nstall FC6 or 7 on such a machine, it would be very tight for disk space,
No. The critical component would be memory (RAM), not diskspace.
very SLOOOOOOWWWWW, and overall painful to use.
Open office will always be painful on with such little RAM ;)
Ralf
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 11:04 -0500, Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
Looks like it'll be painful to use FC in this laptop?
That's too strict, ...
Even for bare minimum install and then just add KDE?
... this is the point: Running KDE, openoffice and "playing videos" are "heavy-weight" tasks.
Running and using them on such a machine is technically possible, but won't be "real fun" and won't be "lightning-fast".
Alternatively, I've had great experience with lean Slackware installations, except that it takes more effort to get things up to date. Usually just FTP download the updates and manually installing them.
What I said above isn't limited to Fedora. The issues are independent of a particular distro - The problems will be similar on all distros, because the issues are these applications' demands/resource-requirements.
If I were you, simply try it to get an impression.
Ralf
Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
Looks like it'll be painful to use FC in this laptop? Even for bare minimum install and then just add KDE?
KDE really would not be a good choice, its about the same sort of 'weight' as gnome really.
I would suggest a much more minimal desktop, say XFCE or FVWM ?
Won't help with running OO as others have pointed out - That does need considerable ram.
Chris
On Wed March 28 2007 11:31:47 am Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
-- Chu Jeang Tan chujtan@gmail.com
Have done this quite a bit - my choices would be MepisLite, DreamLinux, or dynebolic; I've got MepisLite running on a similar machine right now, Micron P2 266/256MB ram, and it runs just fine, though I don't suggest using OpenOffice. DreamLinux is supposed to run well on older machines, and I've used it on a P3 450MHz w/ 384 MB ram, which ran quite well; dynebolic is supposed to do well on older machines, but I've only run it on more modern platforms - it's a bit more work to get it installed to the hard drive and booting, but, it's a neat distro for media-content creatives...
I've installed DreamLinux. For some reason it drops me off at an unconfigured GRUB prompt and I can't boot it up.
Later on installed Xubuntu over it, and it works great so far. In the beginning it booted up with only 640x480. It turned out that Ubuntu's default refresh rate is not compatible with the LCD screen. A non-linux person would have been stumped here for quite a while. I think Redhat has gui tools for setting up the monitor type properly.
On 3/28/07, Claude Jones claude_jones@levitjames.com wrote:
On Wed March 28 2007 11:31:47 am Chu Jeang Tan wrote:
My friend has the following laptop: CPU: Pentium 2 266MHz Memory: 256MB Hard drive: 4gb
How would you setup a usable Linux system on this? It should be able to run web browser, open office suite, IM, play MP3, various video formats.
Is Fedora a good choice for low powered system?
I'd think gnome may be too heavyweight WM and KDE might be a better option.
Note that this is for a novice and probably would prefer to configure stuffs through UI rather than text editors.
-- Chu Jeang Tan chujtan@gmail.com
Have done this quite a bit - my choices would be MepisLite, DreamLinux, or dynebolic; I've got MepisLite running on a similar machine right now, Micron P2 266/256MB ram, and it runs just fine, though I don't suggest using OpenOffice. DreamLinux is supposed to run well on older machines, and I've used it on a P3 450MHz w/ 384 MB ram, which ran quite well; dynebolic is supposed to do well on older machines, but I've only run it on more modern platforms - it's a bit more work to get it installed to the hard drive and booting, but, it's a neat distro for media-content creatives...
-- Claude Jones Brunswick, Md, USA
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-
Chris Jones -
Chu Jeang Tan -
Claude Jones -
Fred Smith -
Ralf Corsepius -
Wade Hampton