Bonjour,
I installed the last kernel (4.11.3-202.fc25.x86_64) today and there are no more virtualbox modules for this kernel: kmod-VirtualBox-5.1.20-1.fc25.x86_64 is empty and so systemd complains at boot time that virtualbox modules cannot be loaded....
What is this issue?
Thank you.
On 06/14/17 20:46, François Patte wrote:
I installed the last kernel (4.11.3-202.fc25.x86_64) today and there are no more virtualbox modules for this kernel: kmod-VirtualBox-5.1.20-1.fc25.x86_64 is empty and so systemd complains at boot time that virtualbox modules cannot be loaded....
What is this issue?
kmod-VirtualBox is supplied by rpmfusion. So, you may want to ask them?
I use VirtualBox-5.1 supplied by http://www.virtualbox.org and their repo without issues.
kmod-VirtualBox is supplied by rpmfusion. So, you may want to ask them?
I use VirtualBox-5.1 supplied by http://www.virtualbox.org and their repo without issues.
How do you choose to install the version of one repo when you have 2 repos which have a version of the same package? I have installed VirtualBox apparently from rpmfusion. I would like to install the guest additions but I get the following message: Last metadata expiration check: 1:23:52 ago on Wed Jun 28 13:07:05 2017. Error: package kmod-VirtualBox-4.11.6-201.fc25.x86_64-5.1.22-1.fc25.x86_64 requires VirtualBox-kmod-common >= 5.1.22, but none of the providers can be installed (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
I am afraid by doing what is suggested. Is it painless? Can I uninstall everything and install virtualbox versions? but I do not see a version of the guest additions from virtualbox repository.
Frédéric
On 28 June 2017 at 14:32, Frédéric Bron frederic.bron@m4x.org wrote:
I am afraid by doing what is suggested. Is it painless?
If you´re worried that removing VirtualBox will delete your existing VMs, it won´t.
poc