Can anyone tell me the safest way to upgrade these packages all at once? Is there a way to do it with yum without adding the devel repositories or another easy way?
rpm -Uvi glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm warning: glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8 error: Failed dependencies: glibc = 2.3.4 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 glibc-headers = 2.3.4-10 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10
Am Sa, den 26.02.2005 schrieb Paul Rennix um 22:20:
Can anyone tell me the safest way to upgrade these packages all at once? Is there a way to do it with yum without adding the devel repositories or another easy way?
rpm -Uvi glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm
"-Uvi" is a nonsense parameter combination. Either use "-U" for updating _or_ "-i" for installation. Don't install with glibc packages you want to update.
warning: glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8
Install the Fedora Core GPG key.
error: Failed dependencies: glibc = 2.3.4 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 glibc-headers = 2.3.4-10 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10
Use yum: www.fedorafaq.org.
Warning: Don't install a glibc which is NOT for your Core release!
Alexander
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 14:20 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
Can anyone tell me the safest way to upgrade these packages all at once? Is there a way to do it with yum without adding the devel repositories or another easy way?
rpm -Uvi glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm warning: glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8 error: Failed dependencies: glibc = 2.3.4 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 glibc-headers = 2.3.4-10 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10
Use something like yum and it will handle the dependencies for you "# yum update glibc-devel" would seem to handle that.
Thanks to both for your replies.
I imported the key, that problem solved.
I need to update to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 to avoid a bug in proftpd.
with yum I tried:
# yum update glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: Fedora Core 2 -- Fedora US mirror Server: Fedora Linux (stable) for Fedora Core 2 -- Fedora US mirror Server: Fedora Core 2 updates -- Fedora US mirror Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Cannot find any package matching glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 available to be updated. No actions to take
and this
# yum update glibc-devel Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: Fedora Core 2 -- Fedora US mirror Server: Fedora Linux (stable) for Fedora Core 2 -- Fedora US mirror Server: Fedora Core 2 updates -- Fedora US mirror Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers glibc-devel is installed and the latest version. No actions to take
trying with rpm I get this:
# rpm -Uvh glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: glibc = 2.3.4 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 glibc-headers = 2.3.4-10 is needed by glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 #
Am Sa, den 26.02.2005 schrieb Paul Rennix um 23:49:
Thanks to both for your replies.
I imported the key, that problem solved.
I need to update to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 to avoid a bug in proftpd.
I think you don't know what you are doing. The glibc you are trying to install is from development / rawhide! Use a different FTP server if there is a bug with proftpd.
Alexander
Am Sa, den 26.02.2005 schrieb Paul Rennix um 23:49:
Thanks to both for your replies.
I imported the key, that problem solved.
I need to update to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 to avoid a bug in proftpd.
:I think you don't know what you are doing. The glibc you are trying to :install is from development / rawhide! Use a different FTP server if :there is a bug with proftpd.
:Alexander
Am So, den 27.02.2005 schrieb Paul Rennix um 0:40:
from proftpd forums: http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=297
I am sent here:
the problem is supposedly with glibc: http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2524
Ok.
this looks like it could be the reason as I do utilitze DefaultRoot in proftpd 1.2.10 (latest)
proftpd hangs on LIST. Especially with OSX clients trying to connect. Bugzilla lists this as resolved with glibc-devel-2.3.4-10, so I am trying to update glibc properly.
If I knew what I was doing *to resolve this problem* I wouldn't be asking. I DON'T want to force anything or break anything, which is why I ask. I went from the proftpd forums, was referred to this bug listing/resolution - and perhaps I was sent in the wrong direction. Maybe someone can help, that's why I'm here.
Paul
What I want to make you to see is, that package from rawhide / development, like the glibc 2.4.3-10 package you call, is nothing you can call *stable* under each circumstance. rawhide / development is some kind of a current beta process, even at times in alpha state. In worst case you have many many trouble! Especially if exchanging the glibc, which plays a central role on a Linux system. It might fix your FTP problem but get you a lot of other problems. You write yourself it is a production server with the proftpd problem. So be warned!
rpm -qp --changelog glibc-2.3.4-10.i686.rpm shows me:
* Di Feb 08 2005 Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com 2.3.4-6
- update from CVS - ld.so auditing - fix segfault if chrooted app attempts to dlopen a library and no standard library directory exists at all (#147067, #144303) - fix initgroups when nscd is running, but has group caching disabled (#146588)
Maybe thats the fixing thing?
And you are speaking and handling the glibc-devel RPM - shows too you don't know what that is. Normally you don't need a -devel package. So if you really want to update your FC2 glibc with the development version from today, then do following:
1) rpm -qa | grep "glibc" | grep "2.3.3" | sort 2) for each package from 1) get the corresponding from the development tree on an FTP server; store them i.e. in /var/tmp/ 3) cd /var/tmp; rpm -Uvh glibc*
You got warned. Have a backup.
Alexander
Am Sa, den 26.02.2005 schrieb Paul Rennix um 23:49:
I need to update to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10 to avoid a bug in proftpd.
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
Alexander
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
-----
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom built scripts.
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom built scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul.
Hi Paul, do you meant to say that FC3 is not for regular user? in your previous mail, you had mentioned that FC2 is the last release. would you mind to clarify it bit please? Thanks Mohan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Howarth" paul@city-fan.org To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 2:24 PM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... der=asc&highlight=
Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom
built
scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul.
Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Am So, den 27.02.2005 schrieb Kumara um 16:59:
Hi Paul, do you meant to say that FC3 is not for regular user? in your previous mail, you had mentioned that FC2 is the last release. would you mind to clarify it bit please? Thanks Mohan
Kumuara,
would you please stop top-posting and begin to strip the quotes? Where do you see that Paul said "FC3 is not for regular users" and that "FC2 is the last release". If you would quote correctly one could see to which posting and which sentence your are referring. And please start a new topic or at least change the one your a joinging but going to a different direction with something like
Re: FC3 not recommended? (was: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2)
Alexander
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Dalloz" ad+lists@uni-x.org To: "Kumara" kumara.jayaweera@damad.com; "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 7:16 PM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2 ============================================================================ ==
Sorry for the mistakes i did, I'll correct myself in next posts Thank you Alex
this is what I have confused, but still regards to Paul, this is the reply I got from Paul for my mail headed "Hope your support for my hobby" dated Sunday, February 27, 2005 02:03 AM
=========================================================================== Hi,
But, I have got only RH9,FC1 and FC3 for Linux.
Linux is the kernel. RH9, FC1-3 are distros.
Hope your assistance to collect those previous versions of Linux, (I'm going to download FC2 now).
FC3 is the current version. FC4 is due in April (IIRC). FC2 was the last release - therefore a previous distro!
please send me links to get downloaded them if you know some sources, and could somebody clear me history of Linux OS's generations?
For a history of Linux : google "history of Linux" (or something similar). Downloading FC, try fedora.redhat.com and look at the downloads page.
TTFN
Paul -- "I like blinking me" - Helen, Big Brother 2 contestant =============================================================
That is confused next post headed "Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2" dated Sunday, February 27, 2005 02:24 PM
============================================================= On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... der=asc&highlight=
Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom
built
scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul. -- Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
============================================================================ =====
I looked some difference between this contains and got confused, if someone can get it, I hope your assistance to get cleared it. Thank you very much Mohan
Kumara wrote:
<>
this is what I have confused, but still regards to Paul, this is the reply I got from Paul for my mail headed "Hope your support for my hobby" dated Sunday, February 27, 2005 02:03 AM
===========================================================================
<> FC3 is the current version. FC4 is due in April (IIRC). FC2 was the last release - therefore a previous distro!
"last" used in the context above is equivalent to "immediately preceeding". Thus, Paul was saying that FC2 was the version, or release, of Fedora that preceeded FC3.
No, that is not what I meant : )
FC3 is fine for general use. Generally though..... FC3 is just a little too new to use on a production web server (for me).
So far, I just love FC3 and am testing it serving non-critical webpages and such. I like to give it a few more months for security flaws to be found and worked out and for questions to get asked and answered by folks before me.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kumara" kumara.jayaweera@damad.com To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
Hi Paul, do you meant to say that FC3 is not for regular user? in your previous mail, you had mentioned that FC2 is the last release. would you mind to clarify it bit please? Thanks Mohan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Howarth" paul@city-fan.org To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 2:24 PM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=... der=asc&highlight=
Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom
built
scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul.
Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Thank you very much for the reply, I got some confusion because I still new to FC3. I accidentally read it as posted by Mr. Paul Howarth too. sorry, Thanks Mohan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Rennix" paul2004@thespps.org To: "Kumara" kumara.jayaweera@damad.com; "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
No, that is not what I meant : )
FC3 is fine for general use. Generally though..... FC3 is just a little
too
new to use on a production web server (for me).
So far, I just love FC3 and am testing it serving non-critical webpages
and
such. I like to give it a few more months for security flaws to be found and worked out and for questions to get asked and answered by folks before me.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kumara" kumara.jayaweera@damad.com To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
Hi Paul, do you meant to say that FC3 is not for regular user? in your previous mail, you had mentioned that FC2 is the last release. would you mind to clarify it bit please? Thanks Mohan
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Howarth" paul@city-fan.org To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 2:24 PM Subject: Re: update glibc to glibc-devel-2.3.4-10.i386.rpm on FC2
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:42 -0700, Paul Rennix wrote:
You are referring to what's discussed in here?
http://forums.proftpd.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=6&start=0&postdays=...
der=asc&highlight=
Upgrade to FC3 instead of using package from the development tree. Especially the glibc is a _very_ central package.
no, I don't want fc3. This is for production server with many custom
built
scripts.
Another workaround you might want to try is to change directory to the chroot environment you have set up and do:
# mkdir lib # cd lib # cp -a /lib/libnss*dns* .
This would be with your existing glibc.
Works for me (in FC3, but should work in FC2 too).
Paul.
Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
-
Alexander Dalloz -
David Curry -
Jeff Vian -
Kumara Jayaweera -
Paul Howarth -
Paul Rennix