Actual Xfce version

[poma]

Mister Steve Dodier-Lazaro, if you are unable to answer a very simple question, it is
still just OK for me.
Is it really needed, this your escapade, here[0] in xfce4-dev list?
Please for the future reference, try not to judge just because you do not understand, even
though it was really simple question.
Rather prefer to keep trying and looking for an explanation.

Rather then "heads up", shall we say, "lips up", Johannes? ;)


Yours sincerely


[0] https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-dev/2015-February/031176.html


--
__  __ __            _  _    _ ____  
\ \/ // _| ___ ___  | || |  / |___ \ 
 \  /| |_ / __/ _ \ | || |_ | | __) |
 /  \|  _| (_|  __/ |__   _|| |/ __/ 
/_/\_\_|  \___\___|    |_|(_)_|_____|

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:59 +0100, poma wrote:
>  Mister Steve Dodier-Lazaro, if you are unable to answer a very
> simple
>  question, it is still just OK for me.
>  Is it really needed, this your escapade, here[0] in xfce4-dev list? 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Do_not_Cross_Post

poc

[poma]

On 27.02.2015 14:04, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>  On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:59 +0100, poma wrote:
> > Mister Steve Dodier-Lazaro, if you are unable to answer a very simple
> > question, it is still just OK for me.
> > Is it really needed, this your escapade, here[0] in xfce4-dev list?
>  
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#Do_not_Cross_Post
>  
>  poc
>   
Please just do not say you're sitting next to the screen and you are waiting for me.
:)