java installation issues

[Dave Stevens]

trying to follow the installation directions at:

http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-sun-oracle-java-jdk-jr...

and getting this, which isn't productive. Anyone have a better cheat sheet?

Dave


]# rpm -Uvh jdk-7u17-linux-x64.rpm
Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
Updating / installing...
    1:jdk-2000:1.7.0_17-fcs            ################################# [100%]
Unpacking JAR files...
	rt.jar...
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/rt.pack
	jsse.jar...
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/jsse.pack
	charsets.jar...
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/charsets.pack
	tools.jar...
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/lib/tools.pack
	localedata.jar...
Error: Could not open input file:  
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/ext/localedata.pack


-- 
The problem with being cynical is you can't keep up!

-- anon. philosopher

[Terry Polzin]

I have never had any luck with the rpm. 
I have uses the tarball for a while now. 




    1. Download the tarball. 
    2. move / copy the tarball to where you wish java to reside 
    3. untar/gzip the tarball 
    4. apply alternatives 


        1. alternatives --install /usr/bin/java java /usr/java/jre1.7.0_13/bin/java 20000

        2. alternatives --install /usr/bin/javaws javaws /usr/java/jre1.7.0_13/bin/javaws
20000 
        3. alternatives --install /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so
libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 /usr/java/jre1.7.0_13/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so 20000 
        4. /usr/sbin/alternatives --config java 
        5. /usr/sbin/alternatives --config javaws 
        6. /usr/sbin/alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so.x86_64 








----- Original Message -----
trying to follow the installation directions at: 

http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-sun-oracle-java-jdk-jr...


and getting this, which isn't productive. Anyone have a better cheat sheet? 

Dave 


]# rpm -Uvh jdk-7u17-linux-x64.rpm 
Preparing... ################################# [100%] 
Updating / installing... 
1:jdk-2000:1.7.0_17-fcs ################################# [100%] 
Unpacking JAR files... 
rt.jar... 
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/rt.pack 
jsse.jar... 
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/jsse.pack 
charsets.jar... 
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/charsets.pack 
tools.jar... 
Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/lib/tools.pack 
localedata.jar... 
Error: Could not open input file: 
/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/ext/localedata.pack 


-- 
The problem with being cynical is you can't keep up! 

-- anon. philosopher 



-- 
users mailing list 
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org 
To unsubscribe or change subscription options: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users 
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

[Reindl Harald]

Am 05.03.2013 20:10, schrieb Dave Stevens:
>  trying to follow the installation directions at:
>  
>
> http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-sun-oracle-java-jdk-jr...
>  
>  and getting this, which isn't productive. Anyone have a better cheat sheet?
>  
>  Dave
>  
>  
>  ]# rpm -Uvh jdk-7u17-linux-x64.rpm
>  Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
>  Updating / installing...
>     1:jdk-2000:1.7.0_17-fcs            ################################# [100%]
>  Unpacking JAR files...
>      rt.jar...
>  Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/rt.pack 
and why do you not simply "yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk"
OpenJDK is the reference implementation of Java7

[Dave Stevens]

Quoting Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net&gt;:

>  Am 05.03.2013 20:10, schrieb Dave Stevens:
> > trying to follow the installation directions at:
> >
> >
> http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-sun-oracle-java-jdk-jr...
> >
> > and getting this, which isn't productive. Anyone have a better cheat sheet?
> >
> > Dave
> >  
> > ]# rpm -Uvh jdk-7u17-linux-x64.rpm
> > Preparing...                           
> > ################################# [100%]
> > Updating / installing...
> >    1:jdk-2000:1.7.0_17-fcs             
> > ################################# [100%]
> > Unpacking JAR files...
> >     rt.jar...
> > Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/rt.pack
>
>  and why do you not simply "yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk"
>  OpenJDK is the reference implementation of Java7
>
>  
like this:

...

Package 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.7.0.fc18.x86_64 already  
installed and latest version
Nothing to do

So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences  
shows javascript enabled.

Suggestions?

d




>  


-- 
The problem with being cynical is you can't keep up!

-- anon. philosopher

[Reindl Harald]

Am 06.03.2013 17:59, schrieb Dave Stevens:
>  Quoting Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net&gt;:
> >> ]# rpm -Uvh jdk-7u17-linux-x64.rpm
> >> Preparing...                          ################################# [100%]
> >> Updating / installing...
> >>    1:jdk-2000:1.7.0_17-fcs            ################################# [100%]
> >> Unpacking JAR files...
> >>     rt.jar...
> >> Error: Could not open input file: /usr/java/jdk1.7.0_17/jre/lib/rt.pack
> >
> > and why do you not simply "yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk"
> > OpenJDK is the reference implementation of Java7
> >
>  like this:
>  
>  Package 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.7.0.fc18.x86_64 already installed and latest
> version
>  Nothing to do
>  
>  So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences shows javascript
> enabled.
>  Suggestions? 
install the plugin?
yum install "icedtea-web"

so the question in another form:
why do you not ask where is the plugin BEFORE you try to
install additionally crap outside the repos?

Google: "fedora java browser plugin"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ#What_about_running_Jav...
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/question/10247/how-to-install-the-java-web-...

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:59 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
>  So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox
> preferences
>  shows javascript enabled. 
Java and Javascript are two different things.

poc

[Reindl Harald]

Am 06.03.2013 19:12, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
>  On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:59 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
> > So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences
> > shows javascript enabled.
>  
>  Java and Javascript are two different things 
yes, and i started to ignore this fact in posts and stop
explain people basics which everybody knows who is
interested at all because virtually everybody does
know this or does not need to know it because he
is a user with no technical interests

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 19:21 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>  
>  Am 06.03.2013 19:12, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
>  > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:59 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
>  >> So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences
>  >> shows javascript enabled.
>  > 
>  > Java and Javascript are two different things
>  
>  yes, and i started to ignore this fact in posts and stop
>  explain people basics which everybody knows who is
>  interested at all because virtually everybody does
>  know this or does not need to know it because he
>  is a user with no technical interests 
The OP is complaining about a Java issue, but makes a comment about
Javascript, and you don't think that's relevant?

poc

[Reindl Harald]

Am 06.03.2013 20:56, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
>  On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 19:21 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> > Am 06.03.2013 19:12, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> >> On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 08:59 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
> >>> So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences
> >>> shows javascript enabled.
> >>
> >> Java and Javascript are two different things
> >
> > yes, and i started to ignore this fact in posts and stop
> > explain people basics which everybody knows who is
> > interested at all because virtually everybody does
> > know this or does not need to know it because he
> > is a user with no technical interests
>  
>  The OP is complaining about a Java issue, but makes a comment about
>  Javascript, and you don't think that's relevant? 
it's relevant but i am tired ot explain people that JavaScript
has nothing to do with Java after more than 10 years because
Google was invited to learn the absolute basics

[Tim]

Allegedly, on or about 06 March 2013, Dave Stevens sent:
>  Package 1:java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.9-2.3.7.0.fc18.x86_64 already  
>  installed and latest version Nothing to do
>  
>  So I assume it needs to be enabled in Firefox, but Firefox preferences
>  shows javascript enabled.  
As has been pointed out, they're two entirely different things.  The
similarity in names is down to corporate-style bad behaviour of copying
names to jump on someone else's bandwagon.

Additionally, I'll point out that there are separate preferences to
enable/disable each of them in Firefox.  And you may have to look
through plug-ins set-ups regarding Java.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.7.9-104.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Feb 24 19:19:12 UTC 2013 x86_64

All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.