I just starting moving a lot of files on to a USB hard disk, which consists of deleting about 20 GB of data and then putting about 15GB of data back on. This appears to be working fine, however....
Once I started the data copies (two of them) and the "empty trash" commands all at the same time I noticed that I lost the ability to manipulate the windows on the screen. I lost the border around the windows, I can't resize, minimize, maximize etc.
Suggestions?
Thanks, Jeff
Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I just starting moving a lot of files on to a USB hard disk, which consists of deleting about 20 GB of data and then putting about 15GB of data back on. This appears to be working fine, however....
Once I started the data copies (two of them) and the "empty trash" commands all at the same time I noticed that I lost the ability to manipulate the windows on the screen. I lost the border around the windows, I can't resize, minimize, maximize etc.
Suggestions?
Thanks, Jeff
Only have one operation going on the USB hard drive at a time. Heavy access of a USB drive tends to slow an OS to a crawl. I am not sure if it is because of too much code that runs with interrupts disabled, or too many interrupts to get the data to the drive, but there is a definite slowdown once the buffers are full, and you are down to direct write speed. You man be able to improve thing using nice or renice to lower the priority of the copy operation.
Mikkel
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Jeffrey Ross wrote:
I just starting moving a lot of files on to a USB hard disk, which consists of deleting about 20 GB of data and then putting about 15GB of data back on. This appears to be working fine, however....
Once I started the data copies (two of them) and the "empty trash" commands all at the same time I noticed that I lost the ability to manipulate the windows on the screen. I lost the border around the windows, I can't resize, minimize, maximize etc.
Suggestions?
Thanks, Jeff
Only have one operation going on the USB hard drive at a time. Heavy access of a USB drive tends to slow an OS to a crawl. I am not sure if it is because of too much code that runs with interrupts disabled, or too many interrupts to get the data to the drive, but there is a definite slowdown once the buffers are full, and you are down to direct write speed. You man be able to improve thing using nice or renice to lower the priority of the copy operation.
Mikkel
The machine itself never became sluggish. but I lost all the borders on all my windows, they never returned when the copy was done. I had to logout and log back in for them to return.
Jeff
Jeffrey Ross wrote:
The machine itself never became sluggish. but I lost all the borders on all my windows, they never returned when the copy was done. I had to logout and log back in for them to return.
I run metacity --replace & and get back the title, minimize, maximize and close buttons. Both beryl and compiz are lacking buttons. Metacity is still normal. The laptop has a 01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility U1.
Jim
Jeff