DG965OT motherboard sound

[Daniel Waineo]

Hi,

I was wondering if anyone out there had gotten sound
to work on this motherboard or the DG965WH in FC6 (or
7 test).  I've been working on it for a week now and
have had no luck.

Thanks!

--- [e-mail] wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
>    [e-mail]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
>    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
>    [e-mail]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    [e-mail]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
> CIFS mounting (Ashley M. Kirchner)
> Desktop Effects (Derek Tracy)
> Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res)
> Re: Dovecot Assertion on mail server with POP3
>
> and LDAP
>       authentication (Jim Hayward)
>    5. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed
> Greshko)
>    6. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Matthew
> Miller)
>    7. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res)
>    8. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
> ([e-mail])
>    9. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed
> Greshko)
>   10. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed
> Greshko)
>   11. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Res)
>   12. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Arthur
> Pemberton)
>   13. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Arthur
> Pemberton)
>   14. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
> ([e-mail])
>   15. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Ed
> Greshko)
>   16. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Peter
> Gordon)
>   17. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck (Peter
> Gordon)
>   18. Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
> ([e-mail])

----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:12:15 -0600
> From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" 
> Subject: CIFS mounting
> To: For users of Fedora 
> Message-ID: 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> Hi gang,
>
> I need to auto-mount three CIFS and I'm not sure
>
> how to get that 
> done with passwords and all.  Right now, manually I
> do:
>     mount -t cifs //server1/OData
>
> /mnt/server1/OData \
>               -o user=username,passwd=userpasswd
> How does that get done with fstab?  Or am I
>
> better off sticking it 
> in local.rc?
>
> -- 
> H | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature.

+--------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ashley M. Kirchner    . 
>  303.442.6410 x130
>   IT Director / SysAdmin / Websmith             .   
>  800.441.3873 x130
>   Photo Craft Imaging                       .    
> 3550 Arapahoe Ave. #6
>   http://www.pcraft.com ..... .  .    .      
> Boulder, CO 80303, U.S.A.
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:13:22 -0400
> From: "Derek Tracy" 
> Subject: Desktop Effects
> To: [e-mail]
> Message-ID:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
> format=flowed
>
> I finally got the proprietary Nvidia Drivers to work
> (had to recompile
> the drivers from src) with rawhide, but when I went
> to enable the
> Desktop Effects it bombs out on me.  My question is
> where is the log
> file that I can find the reason it is dying?
> --  R/S
>
> Derek Tracy
> [e-mail]
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:18:30 +1000 (EST)
> From: "Res" 
> Subject: Re: Fedora/RH policies sometimes suck
> To: [e-mail]
> Message-ID:

> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> On Tue, April 10, 2007 11:05 am, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:46:25PM -0400,
>
> [e-mail]
> > wrote:
> > > No it has something to do with the function not
>
> being open
> > > source or something like that. It was on another
>
> mailing
> > That's not "stripped", that's "can't legally
>
> include".
> >
>
> BS, if the code producers have a complete package 
> and fedora decide they
> dont want to or cant for their own internal policy
> reasons include a part
> of it, thats STRIPPED, it is STRIPPED code that IS
> in the
> correct/real/publicly available TRUE source and
> binaries released by the
> code producers.
> > --
> > Matthew Miller           [e-mail]
>
> http://mattdm.org/
> > Boston University Linux      ------>
>
> http://linux.bu.edu/
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Res
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:23:22 -0700
> From: Jim Hayward 
> Subject: Re: Dovecot Assertion on mail server with
> POP3 and LDAP
>    authentication
> To: [e-mail], For users of Fedora
>    
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 13:03 -0700, Tim Alberts
> wrote:
> > > Checking through the server maillog, I see the
>
> following entry:
> > > Apr  4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default):
>
> dovecot-auth:
> > > ../../../libraries/liblber/io.c:491:
>
> ber_get_next: Assertion
> > > `ber->ber_buf == ((void *)0)' failed.
> > > Apr  4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default): 
> > > pam(secretuser,192.168.0.200): Child process
>
> died
> > > Apr  4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: auth(default):
>
> PAM: Child 14564 died
> > > with signal 6
> > > Apr  4 08:44:38 msi2 dovecot: pop3-login:
>
> Aborted login:
> > > user=<secretuser>, method=PLAIN,
>
> rip=192.168.0.200, lip=192.168.0.11
> > >
>
> I have not seen this error, but since the updates a
> couple days ago,
> Dovecot keeps dying. I've had to restart it several
> times the last few
> days. I'm using imap only with dovecot. The only
> thing I can find in the
> logs...
>
> Apr  8 16:19:04 penguin dovecot: Time just moved
> backwards by 205
> seconds. This might cause a lot of problems, so I'll
> just kill myself
> now.
>
> Regards,
>    Jim H
> -- 
> Jim Hayward 
> GPG Key available at: http://keyserver.noreply.org
> gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.noreply.org
> 0x85A92DCC
> GPG Fingerprint: 1AA9 AEC9 BFDF FF7A E4F8 90C7 4947
> 3A41 85A9 2DCC

[Ed Greshko]

Daniel Waineo wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there had gotten sound
> to work on this motherboard or the DG965WH in FC6 (or
> 7 test).  I've been working on it for a week now and
> have had no luck.

You seem to have included a bunch of stuff from other threads.....

You may want to post the output of lspci since I wouldn't expect folks to
lookup your motherboard to find out what chipset is being used.

[Peter Gordon]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 22:18 -0700, Daniel Waineo wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone out there had gotten sound
> to work on this motherboard or the DG965WH in FC6 (or
> 7 test).  I've been working on it for a week now and
> have had no luck.

Yeah, it's rather tricky. I've a DG965WH motherboard and here's what I
did to get it working:

Foremostly, ensure that your speakers or headphone plug(s) are properly
connected. With mine, I plug my headphones into the back green-lined
connector; and this is seen as the "Front" device in my volume
preferences. (If you're using more than a simple stereo or 2.1 setup,
see the motherboard manual from Intel's site to properly match the I/O
connectors.)

Then, you should be using the snd-hda-intel driver module, which the
"Soundcard Detection" tool (system-config-soundcard) automatically
detected for me. Then, if you're using the analog I/O, make sure to set
the "STAC92xx Analog" option for the default PCM device.

Finally, make sure the "PCM" and "Front" controls are unmuted and set to
an appropriate level for your comfort, and you should have
nicely-working sound. (Personally, I set the PCM at about 95% and the
Front at about 70-80%, based on the current playing music/game; but your
listening habits may vary, especially if using true speakers instead of
headphones as I do.)

Hope that helps.