the new kernel

[mitch epling]

hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i
compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to
throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

[Adam Voigt]

Just one word, HUH?

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:00, AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i
> compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to
> throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

What?

AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i 
> compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to 
> throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

[mitch epling]

talking about kernel 2.6.3-2.1.223

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 13:29, [e-mail] wrote:
> What?
>
> AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> > hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i 
> > compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to 
> > throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

[Christoph Wickert]

Am Di, den 02.03.2004 schrieb AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION um 23:07:
> talking about kernel 2.6.3-2.1.223

Please read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Christoph

[Jeff Vian]

AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> talking about kernel 2.6.3-2.1.223
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 13:29, [e-mail] wrote:
> > /What?
> >
> > AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> > > hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i 
> > > compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to 
> > > throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start
> >
> > /

What do you mean "no boot"

The kernel has not been loaded/used until after you reboot.  A reboot is 
never required for the compile/install steps.

[Gertjan Vinkesteijn]

Jeff Vian wrote:
> AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> > talking about kernel 2.6.3-2.1.223
> >
> > On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 13:29, [e-mail] wrote:
> > > /What?
> > >
> > > AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> > > > hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . 
> > > > i compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you 
> > > > need to throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start
> > >
> > > /
>
> What do you mean "no boot"
>
> The kernel has not been loaded/used until after you reboot.  A reboot 
> is never required for the compile/install steps.

Mumble, mumble
I run 2.6.3-1.116 under Fedora 1.90, it says that you do not need 
ide-scsi any longer, but I always use webmin for burning and that does 
not except /dev/hdb as cdrom-r/w thus I made a new kernel with ide-scsi 
on. Now the whole machine hangs during fixating!
Has anybody any idea how this occurs? Should I use the above kernel?

[Alexandre Strube]

Em Ter, 2004-03-02 às 16:00, AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION escreveu:
> hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i
> compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to
> throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

So don't compile, download the rpm from Redhat's site, Arjanv's home
folder. I've been using it for quite some time, working flawless for
more than a month without reboot on a smb server...

[Rodolfo J. Paiz]

At 13:00 3/2/2004, you wrote:
> hey i that new 2.6 core remake . its just like its first brother . i 
> compiled it on 10 diffrent computers and no boot at all . you need to 
> throw that junk out of the warehouse and make a new start

You are not making ANY sense.

Are you bitching, or asking for help? If the former, go away. If the 
latter, give more details and be more specific.

Also, consider that if thousands of people have gotten "that new kernel" to 
work and you haven't... then perhaps it's something *you're* doing?