System upgrade from Fedora 30 to Fedora 31-beta gives these errors (with --skip-broken)
Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package aether-connector-okhttp-0.17.6- 2.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch requires mvn(com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp) >= 3.14.2, but none of the providers can be installed - okhttp-3.14.2-1.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package aether-connector-okhttp-0.17.6- 2.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch Problem 2: package bro-2.5.4-4.fc30.x86_64 requires broctl = 2.5.4- 4.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - broctl-2.5.4-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package bro-2.5.4-4.fc30.x86_64 Problem 3: package ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.8.6-27.fc30.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.8.6-27.fc30.x86_64 requires libebook-contacts-1.2.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.8.6-27.fc30.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.25()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - evolution-data-server-3.32.4-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.8.6- 27.fc30.x86_64 Problem 4: package hash-slinger-2.7-8.fc29.noarch requires python2- unbound, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-unbound-1.8.3-4.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package hash-slinger-2.7-8.fc29.noarch Problem 5: package maven-indexer-6.0.0- 3.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch requires lucene >= 8.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - lucene-8.1.1-2.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package maven-indexer-6.0.0- 3.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch Problem 6: package pybliographer-1.2.18-6.fc30.noarch requires gnome- python2-bonobo, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-23.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pybliographer-1.2.18-6.fc30.noarch Problem 7: package pykde4-devel-4.14.3-30.fc30.x86_64 requires pykde4(x86-64) = 4.14.3-30.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - pykde4-4.14.3-30.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pykde4-devel-4.14.3-30.fc30.x86_64 Problem 8: problem with installed package gnome-builder-3.32.3- 1.fc30.x86_64 - package gnome-builder-3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 9: problem with installed package guice-multibindings-4.1- 14.fc30.noarch - package guice-multibindings-4.2.2-1.fc31.noarch requires mvn(com.google.inject:guice) = 4.2.2, but none of the providers can be installed - guice-multibindings-4.1-14.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package google-guice-4.2.2-1.module_f28+4409+43f8f627.noarch is excluded - package google-guice-4.2.2-1.fc31.noarch is excluded Problem 10: package kdevelop-libs-9:5.4.2-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libKF5TextEditor.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package kdevelop-libs-9:5.4.2-1.fc30.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - kdevelop-libs-9:5.4.2-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 11: problem with installed package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1- 1.fc30.x86_64 - package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 12: package openvas-cli-1.4.5-12.fc31.x86_64 requires libopenvas_base.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package openvas-cli-1.4.5-12.fc31.x86_64 requires libopenvas_misc.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package openvas-cli-1.4.5-12.fc31.x86_64 requires libopenvas_omp.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package openvas-cli-1.4.5-12.fc30.x86_64 - openvas-libraries-9.0.3-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - openvas-cli-1.4.5-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 13: package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc31.x86_64 requires libre2.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4- 2.fc30.x86_64 - re2-1:20160401-11.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.12.4-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 14: problem with installed package sparkleshare-3.28- 1.fc30.x86_64 - package sparkleshare-3.28-1.fc31.x86_64 requires mono(notify-sharp) = 3.0.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - sparkleshare-3.28-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - notify-sharp3-3.0.3-9.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository [root@Unknown ~]#
..., but it was a F30 Question *too* !
btw: I get somewhat "nervous" about your "don't do this and that on this and that list(s)"-shit !
sixpack
On 9/20/19 3:57 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
..., but it was a F30 Question *too* !
btw: I get somewhat "nervous" about your "don't do this and that on this and that list(s)"
I don't think he should be quite so strict about people asking questions about unreleased versions. But certainly a problem with upgrading to a beta release is better directed to the test list.
On 9/21/19 7:56 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/20/19 3:57 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
..., but it was a F30 Question *too* !
btw: I get somewhat "nervous" about your "don't do this and that on this and that list(s)"
I don't think he should be quite so strict about people asking questions about unreleased versions. But certainly a problem with upgrading to a beta release is better directed to the test list.
But, I did notice that many of the message indicated the package "does not belong to a distupgrade repository". Yet, I just did an upgrade on a F30 system to F31 without error.
But, yes, these should be reported to the testing list. I'm not even sure if there has been a "test upgrade day".
The OP should, for completeness, disable 3rd party repos and make sure they add --skip-broken and --allowerasing to the upgrade command. If errors persist, report to the test list.
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 22:57 +0000, sixpack13 wrote:
..., but it was a F30 Question *too* !
btw: I get somewhat "nervous" about your "don't do this and that on this and that list(s)"-shit !
Really, it was a F31 question (since it's about installing F31 packages, and specifically F31 beta packages). If it's at all related to "test" versions, you need to ask on the test list, because that's where the test users are.
If you ask the wrong people how to solve a problem, you're not going to get very far. And it's not going to help solve problems with the test packages (other people need to know there's an issue, not us). So you get redirected to where you need to ask your question (likewise to other lists, where you get better answers about SELinux, Evolution, KDE, etc).
It's not about pedantry, it's about practicality. If you're here (on this list) over any length of time, you might notice that there's only about two or three people who have answers to test-related questions.
-
Alan -
Ed Greshko -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
Samuel Sieb -
sixpack13 -
Tim