dictd

[Evgeney]

Hello.

My answer is about packages in fedora.

1)Why dictd package is still 1.5.5? The latest version is 1.9.7. Look at
ftp://ftp.dict.org/pub/dict/.
2)Why you do not include aspell-ru package? There are aspell-fr,
aspell-en, aspell-it
But there is no aspell-ru. There is such package look at
http://aspell.net

With regards,
Evgeney.

[Doncho N. Gunchev]

> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 18:37, Evgeney wrote:
> Hello.
>
> My answer is about packages in fedora.
>
> 1)Why dictd package is still 1.5.5? The latest version is 1.9.7. Look at
> ftp://ftp.dict.org/pub/dict/.
> 2)Why you do not include aspell-ru package? There are aspell-fr,
> aspell-en, aspell-it
> But there is no aspell-ru. There is such package look at
> http://aspell.net
>
> With regards,
> Evgeney.

There's http://bgoffice.sourceforge.net/
  OOo-spell-bg-3.0.zip, OOo-hyph-bg-3.0.zip, aspell-bg-3.0.tar.gz, ispell-bg-3.0.tar.gz
  all in http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=52198

KDE has Bulgarian localization built in, but RedHat did not support Bulgarian language
and kde-i18n-Bulgarian was not distributed. I supose that including all kde localizations
can take a lot of space...

I think the questions are:
    What's the procedure for including them?
    What should/can be done?

[Doncho N. Gunchev]

--- cut ---
> KDE has Bulgarian localization built in, but RedHat did not support
> Bulgarian language and kde-i18n-Bulgarian was not distributed. I supose
> that including all kde localizations can take a lot of space...

...
Sorry, I see kde-i18n-Bulgarian is now included in fedora...

[Evgeney]

Yes, the second question may been reformulated as
1)What's the procedure for including packages?
2)What should/can be done?

And there is still first question why the latest version of dictd is not
in fedora?

Regards,
Evgeney.

В Втр, 28.10.2003, в 20:41, Doncho N. Gunchev написал:
> > On Tuesday 28 October 2003 18:37, Evgeney wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > My answer is about packages in fedora.
> >
> > 1)Why dictd package is still 1.5.5? The latest version is 1.9.7. Look at
> > ftp://ftp.dict.org/pub/dict/.
> > 2)Why you do not include aspell-ru package? There are aspell-fr,
> > aspell-en, aspell-it
> > But there is no aspell-ru. There is such package look at
> > http://aspell.net
> >
> > With regards,
> > Evgeney.
>
> There's http://bgoffice.sourceforge.net/
>   OOo-spell-bg-3.0.zip, OOo-hyph-bg-3.0.zip, aspell-bg-3.0.tar.gz, ispell-bg-3.0.tar.gz
>   all in http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=52198
>
> KDE has Bulgarian localization built in, but RedHat did not support Bulgarian language
> and kde-i18n-Bulgarian was not distributed. I supose that including all kde localizations
> can take a lot of space...
>
> I think the questions are:
>    What's the procedure for including them?
>    What should/can be done?

[bishop]

Evgeney,

I've read the email exchange, and I don't understand the question.

What do you mean "Why has this not been included"?  Is the WHY so much 
more important than the HOW?

- bish

Evgeney wrote:
> Yes, the second question may been reformulated as
> 1)/What's the procedure for including /packages/?/
> 2)/What should/can be done?/
>
> And there is still first question why the latest version of dictd is not 
> in fedora?
>
> Regards,
> Evgeney.
>
> ? ???, 28.10.2003, ? 20:41, Doncho N. Gunchev ???????:
> > /> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 18:37, Evgeney wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > My answer is about packages in fedora.
> > >
> > > 1)Why dictd package is still 1.5.5? The latest version is 1.9.7. Look at
> > > //ftp://ftp.dict.org/pub/dict/.
> > > 2)Why you do not include aspell-ru package? There are aspell-fr,
> > > aspell-en, aspell-it
> > > But there is no aspell-ru. There is such package look at
> > > http://aspell.net
> > >
> > > With regards,
> > > Evgeney.
> >
> > There's http://bgoffice.sourceforge.net/
> >  OOo-spell-bg-3.0.zip, OOo-hyph-bg-3.0.zip, aspell-bg-3.0.tar.gz, ispell-bg-3.0.tar.gz
> >  all in http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=52198
> >
> > KDE has Bulgarian localization built in, but RedHat did not support Bulgarian language
> > and kde-i18n-Bulgarian was not distributed. I supose that including all kde localizations
> > can take a lot of space...
> >
> > I think the questions are:
> >    What's the procedure for including them?
> >    What should/can be done?/