redhat to fedora

[roland]

Hello everybody,

I have some servers installad with redhat9. (K12LTSP)
What is the best way to upgrade or change to Fedora3

Thanks

Roland Brouwers
C.A.T.
Dir.: [phone]
Mobil: [phone]

[gaurav]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

move  to redhat to debian or freebsd but never to fc on production server

brouwers roland lx wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have some servers installad with redhat9. (K12LTSP)
> What is the best way to upgrade or change to Fedora3
>
> Thanks
>
> Roland Brouwers
> C.A.T.
> Dir.: [phone]
> Mobil: [phone]

- --
"Innovation is not absolutely necessary, but then neither is survival."
- -- Andrew Papageorge
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDFBA6VAO9KHA2KWcRAjfXAJ9z/lr2vtg0yiJ2ddqAF4sUS7JpjwCfWxo+
> R+37Es5qFtrjZLxcqZbXeT0=
> =7H0K
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

DISCLAIMER:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail contains confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure, use or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Di, den 30.08.2005 schrieb gaurav um 9:52:
> move  to redhat to debian or freebsd but never to fc on production server

In this way of absolute statement I don't share that opinion. Fedora can
of course be a reliable platform for server tasks in a business
environment, just like Red Hat Linux once was.

Alexander

[Les Mikesell]

On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 06:49, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am Di, den 30.08.2005 schrieb gaurav um 9:52:
> > move  to redhat to debian or freebsd but never to fc on production server
>
> In this way of absolute statement I don't share that opinion. Fedora can
> of course be a reliable platform for server tasks in a business
> environment, just like Red Hat Linux once was.

While you may be able to make fedora work for a server the
Centos project makes a lot more sense for someone who
likes Red Hat but doesn't want to deal with the fast fedora
release cycle and can't pay for Red Hat Enterprise.
http://www.centos.org

[Mike McCarty]

Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 06:49, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > Am Di, den 30.08.2005 schrieb gaurav um 9:52:
> > > move  to redhat to debian or freebsd but never to fc on production server
> >
> > In this way of absolute statement I don't share that opinion. Fedora can
> > of course be a reliable platform for server tasks in a business
> > environment, just like Red Hat Linux once was.
>
> While you may be able to make fedora work for a server the
> Centos project makes a lot more sense for someone who
> likes Red Hat but doesn't want to deal with the fast fedora
> release cycle and can't pay for Red Hat Enterprise.
> http://www.centos.org

I second this opinion. IMO, FCx is not the proper OS for a
workplace environment. No criticism of FCx, just a matter
of using the right tool for the right job. For one who is
developing a product and wants to be "leading edge", FCx is
fine.

Mike