Hello every body,
I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies. It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first time that people complains about my replies. What should I do ? Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically added ? I also checked my setup. I have 3 options when repying: Add original text message Indent original text message Always use default from adress.
Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one also?
Regards.
Subject: Re: evince
On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading. It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Also, by the way, Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
-- Garry T. Williams
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
=========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================
On 12/02/13 07:46, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies. It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first time that people complains about my replies. What should I do ? Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically added ? I also checked my setup. I have 3 options when repying: Add original text message Indent original text message Always use default from adress.
Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one also?
It would seem your web-mail client (X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer) doesn't play well with mailing lists and strips out the References: header.
If your ISP allows it, which it most likely does, you should switch to an IMAP (or POP if you really must) email client such as Thunderbird and use it instead.
On 12/1/2013 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello every body,
I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies. It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first time that people complains about my replies. What should I do ? Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically added ? I also checked my setup. I have 3 options when repying: Add original text message Indent original text message Always use default from adress.
Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one also?
Regards.
Subject: Re: evince
On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading. It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Also, by the way, Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
-- Garry T. Williams
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
=========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================
Patrick,
Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any complaints until recently.
If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a good day.
On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
Patrick,
Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any complaints until recently.
If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a good day.
I'm not annoyed either, but I would refrain from calling other list members "jerks".
However, I could see how posts/clients which strip out the References: headers are annoying. While they don't totally "break" the thread in that some (most) clients will display them with the messages of the same Subject:. However, with clients such as T-Bird it places messages indented based on the References: so you'll get a really good visual as to which message within a thread the rely is paired with. This is lost when References: is removed.
On 12/1/2013 7:29 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
Patrick,
Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any complaints until recently.
If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a good day.
I'm not annoyed either, but I would refrain from calling other list members "jerks".
However, I could see how posts/clients which strip out the References: headers are annoying. While they don't totally "break" the thread in that some (most) clients will display them with the messages of the same Subject:. However, with clients such as T-Bird it places messages indented based on the References: so you'll get a really good visual as to which message within a thread the rely is paired with. This is lost when References: is removed.
Hmm... My first Linux was Redhat v5.2. which came in a book named "Linux for Dumdums" (SP?). My first experience with mailing list help was a Redhat list. And, IMO, those people, at that time, were pompous, stuck up, insulting, A$$HOLES. Pure and simple.
Sadly? I see that becoming the normal here. Not you and many others but but I see too many other 'nasty A$$HOLES' lately.
And that is bad. And that is sad.
On 02.12.2013 01:29, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:02, David wrote:
Patrick,
Your questions and posts have nevrr bothered me. Nor have I seen any complaints until recently.
If I was you? I would ignore the jerks and continue on. \You have a good day.
I'm not annoyed either, but I would refrain from calling other list members "jerks".
However, I could see how posts/clients which strip out the References: headers are annoying. While they don't totally "break" the thread in that some (most) clients will display them with the messages of the same Subject:. However, with clients such as T-Bird it places messages indented based on the References: so you'll get a really good visual as to which message within a thread the rely is paired with. This is lost when References: is removed.
Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo.
poma
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:20:17AM +0100, poma wrote:
.......snip......
Et dimitte nobis debita nostra, sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo.
Those pompous lessons really paid off.
On 12/1/2013 6:46 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello every body,
I am sorry for the disturbance with my replies. It is now 15 years that I use to use mailing list and it is the first time that people complains about my replies. What should I do ? Remove my signature to all my emails while it is automatically added ? I also checked my setup. I have 3 options when repying: Add original text message Indent original text message Always use default from adress.
Only the 2 first ones are checked. Should I check the 3rd one also?
Regards.
Subject: Re: evince
On 12-1-13 17:39:50 Garry T. Williams wrote:
Without the required headers, there is no way to do proper threading. It can only come close using Subject header value, date, and time.
By the way, this is spelled out in RFC-2822. See
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Also, by the way, Microsoft ignores this RFC in its clients. :-(
-- Garry T. Williams
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
=========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================
May I email you directly? Or you me if you prefer. I really do think that I have a simple solution to your problems(s) with Fedors.
-
Bob Holtzman -
David -
Ed Greshko -
Patrick Dupre -
poma