RE: Building a 1pb volume

Never hurts to look at it.
I understood that quite some steps were taken (now at 0.53)

Some people regards the stuff from Microsoft not even "beta-grade" ;-)
Same discussion was  for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.

By trying out, you can get confidence, and from the description it looks highly scalable.

Hans

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 5:08 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: RE: Building a 1pb volume
> You might want to take a look at ceph:
>
> http://ceph.com/docs/master/
> http://ceph.com/ceph-storage/block-storage/

Ceph/Rados appear to still be in the beta stage.  Is that not true?  The 0.48 version number doesn't leave me with a lot of confidence.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScannerhttp://www.mailscanner.info/, and is
believed to be clean.

______________________________________________________________________
Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten.

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

Building a 1pb volume

[Will Yonker]

> Never hurts to look at it.
> I understood that quite some

steps were taken (now at 0.53)
> Some people regards

the stuff from Microsoft not even "beta-grade" ;-)
>

Same discussion was  for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.
> By trying out, you can get confidence, and from the description it

looks
> highly scalable.

You are 100% correct.  I
must be honest, it looks sweet!  Has anyone on the list used it in
production yet?

Building a 1pb volume

[thomas cameron]

On 01/09/2013 10:26 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Never hurts to look at it.
> > I understood that quite some steps were taken (now at 0.53)
> >
> > Some people regards the stuff from Microsoft not even "beta-grade" ;-)
> > Same discussion was for reiserfs and currently for btrfs.
> >
> > By trying out, you can get confidence, and from the description it looks
> > highly scalable.
>
> You are 100% correct.  I must be honest, it looks sweet!  Has anyone on
> the list used it in production yet?

I personally know of Red Hat customers using GlusterFS (a.k.a Red Hat
Storage) for distributed volumes of up to 7pb in production.

See e.g. http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Pandora-Deploys-Gluster

You should be fine with 1pb.