I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
uname -a
{^_^}
On 2016-06-27 14:20, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
On 06/27/2016 02:22 PM, jdow wrote:
uname -a
Joanne, that'll report the kernel version and such but not the distribution release number.
Jim,
That's odd. I believe that "dnf system-upgrade" pulls this stuff from a file called /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json which contains stuff such as system_releasever and target_releasever. It sounds like your system_releasever is set to 24 in that file. If so, then system-upgrade won't do it as it thinks you're already at that level.
You might be able to change that to "23" and rerun your command, but BE WARNED! I've never done this and you could hose your system completely.
Is it possible you downloaded system-upgrade while you were pointed at the rawhide repos and picked that one up instead of the production one?
On 2016-06-27 14:20, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
The release number is a part of the kernel name. It takes a wee bit of knowledge to parse it. For example mine contains "2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64" The ".el6" is the effective release number (Enterprise Linux). In actuality it's Scientific Linux SL6. The other suggestion gives me "Scientific Linux release 6.6 (Carbon)". (It's not quite time for me to go to 6.7. I am waiting a bit until potential problems can be attacked with minimum affect on our work here.)
{^_^}
On 2016-06-27 14:48, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 06/27/2016 02:22 PM, jdow wrote:
uname -a
Joanne, that'll report the kernel version and such but not the distribution release number.
Jim,
That's odd. I believe that "dnf system-upgrade" pulls this stuff from a file called /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json which contains stuff such as system_releasever and target_releasever. It sounds like your system_releasever is set to 24 in that file. If so, then system-upgrade won't do it as it thinks you're already at that level.
You might be able to change that to "23" and rerun your command, but BE WARNED! I've never done this and you could hose your system completely.
Is it possible you downloaded system-upgrade while you were pointed at the rawhide repos and picked that one up instead of the production one?
On 2016-06-27 14:20, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
On 06/27/2016 02:58 PM, jdow wrote:
The release number is a part of the kernel name. It takes a wee bit of knowledge to parse it. For example mine contains "2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64" The ".el6" is the effective release number (Enterprise Linux). In actuality it's Scientific Linux SL6. The other suggestion gives me "Scientific Linux release 6.6 (Carbon)". (It's not quite time for me to go to 6.7. I am waiting a bit until potential problems can be attacked with minimum affect on our work here.)
Uh, again, that's the kernel version, not the OS release version (/etc/issue or /etc/redhat-release or /etc/fedora-release). You can run an F23 kernel on an F24 system easily (or vice-versa). You can even run a kernel that's built from a source tarball that has no "fcXX" or "elX" stuff at all, so while MOST of the time the kernel and the OS release track each other, there's absolutely no guarantee that they do.
Taking my cursory look at the system-upgrade plugin, it appears that it looks at the file I mentioned to figure out which version it currently is and where you want it to go. I've never dug through it that closely, but that seems to be what it does. I could be wrong (and probably am).
On 2016-06-27 14:48, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 06/27/2016 02:22 PM, jdow wrote:
uname -a
Joanne, that'll report the kernel version and such but not the distribution release number.
Jim,
That's odd. I believe that "dnf system-upgrade" pulls this stuff from a file called /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json which contains stuff such as system_releasever and target_releasever. It sounds like your system_releasever is set to 24 in that file. If so, then system-upgrade won't do it as it thinks you're already at that level.
You might be able to change that to "23" and rerun your command, but BE WARNED! I've never done this and you could hose your system completely.
Is it possible you downloaded system-upgrade while you were pointed at the rawhide repos and picked that one up instead of the production one?
On 2016-06-27 14:20, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
On 06/27/2016 03:27 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Taking my cursory look at the system-upgrade plugin, it appears that it looks at the file I mentioned to figure out which version it currently is and where you want it to go. I've never dug through it that closely, but that seems to be what it does. I could be wrong (and probably am).
That's the obvious answer, but it's wrong, or at least, it was wrong for yum and may be for dnf. What it does is check the database to find out what version of the rpm is installed and that that as the answer. Normally, of course, it works just fine. However, just after an upgrade, the database might show both the old and the new version as being installed but the program stops when it finds the first result, and that's the old one. Try using package-cleanup --dupes or whatever the dnf version is and find out if that's an issue.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Joe Zeff joe@zeff.us wrote:
Try using package-cleanup --dupes or whatever the dnf version is and find out if that's an issue.
I'd just add that the dnf equivalent is "dnf repoquery --duplicated" (http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/cli_vs_yum.html).
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com wrote:
Taking my cursory look at the system-upgrade plugin, it appears that it looks at the file I mentioned to figure out which version it currently is and where you want it to go. I've never dug through it that closely, but that seems to be what it does. I could be wrong (and probably am).
You're pretty much right. What the plugin actually does is it looks at the version of the package that provides either the system-release(releasever) or redhat-release virtual provide and takes that version as the current releasever. On Fedora, that package is fedora-release (you can find out by running "dnf repoquery --whatprovides redhat-release").
thank you all for your answers, I'll try to be complete here, but brief 1st, Im not having any troubles - normal ops are fine, sudo dnf update works, etc.
only oddity is with dual boot - 1st few attempts to boot win10 failed after installing 24-beta (not an upgrade from f23). But recent attempts now seem to work, theyre just a little thrashy (iirc, the bios seems to boot 2x - 2 toshiba splash screens) but it gets there. This is my 1st EFI bios machine, so I dont have anything to compare it to.
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/system-release*: ::::::::::::: /etc/system-release :::::::::::::: Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) :::::::::::::: /etc/system-release-cpe :::::::::::::: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:24
So thos are good, but I dont know whether any of these said "beta" anywhere before final release
[jimc@buffy ~]$ rpm -qil fedora-release Name : fedora-release Version : 24 Release : 2 Architecture: noarch Install Date: Mon 27 Jun 2016 02:10:28 PM MDT
my /etc/os-release matches Darios but again I dont know if it said beta earlier.
[jimc@buffy etc]$ dnf repoquery --duplicated Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:45 ago on Tue Jun 28 10:02:03 2016. so that looks clean
$ cat /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json {"upgrade_status": null, "download_status": null}
which seems kind-of empty, and counter to what Rick Stevens expected in it, but again I dont know how it looked before..
to satisfy curiosity, I ran:
[jimc@buffy dnf]$ pwd /var/lib/dnf [jimc@buffy dnf]$ sudo strings history/history-2016-05-04.sqlite | less
saw lots of 'fc24', but no 'beta's other than (mostly) taglib packages.
at this point, things are fine, so Im not gonna sweat the off-chance that I might still be at "Beta" - all the packages upgraded to final.
In a few weeks I'll be back to those fc23 boxes, will do those upgrades, and if that suggests anything pertinent here (longshot) I'll follow up here.
thanks again y'all
Have you tried: Hostnamectl Maybe it helps Il 28/Giu/2016 19:07, "Jim Cromie" jim.cromie@gmail.com ha scritto:
thank you all for your answers, I'll try to be complete here, but brief 1st, Im not having any troubles - normal ops are fine, sudo dnf update works, etc.
only oddity is with dual boot - 1st few attempts to boot win10 failed after installing 24-beta (not an upgrade from f23). But recent attempts now seem to work, theyre just a little thrashy (iirc, the bios seems to boot 2x - 2 toshiba splash screens) but it gets there. This is my 1st EFI bios machine, so I dont have anything to compare it to.
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/system-release*: ::::::::::::: /etc/system-release :::::::::::::: Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) :::::::::::::: /etc/system-release-cpe :::::::::::::: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:24
So thos are good, but I dont know whether any of these said "beta" anywhere before final release
[jimc@buffy ~]$ rpm -qil fedora-release Name : fedora-release Version : 24 Release : 2 Architecture: noarch Install Date: Mon 27 Jun 2016 02:10:28 PM MDT
my /etc/os-release matches Darios but again I dont know if it said beta earlier.
[jimc@buffy etc]$ dnf repoquery --duplicated Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:45 ago on Tue Jun 28 10:02:03 2016. so that looks clean
$ cat /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json {"upgrade_status": null, "download_status": null}
which seems kind-of empty, and counter to what Rick Stevens expected in it, but again I dont know how it looked before..
to satisfy curiosity, I ran:
[jimc@buffy dnf]$ pwd /var/lib/dnf [jimc@buffy dnf]$ sudo strings history/history-2016-05-04.sqlite | less
saw lots of 'fc24', but no 'beta's other than (mostly) taglib packages.
at this point, things are fine, so Im not gonna sweat the off-chance that I might still be at "Beta" - all the packages upgraded to final.
In a few weeks I'll be back to those fc23 boxes, will do those upgrades, and if that suggests anything pertinent here (longshot) I'll follow up here.
thanks again y'all
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Sorry, i'm writing from mobile phone... Il 29/Giu/2016 09:52, "Joe Zeff" joe@zeff.us ha scritto:
On 06/29/2016 12:45 AM, Stefano Cislaghi wrote:
Have you tried: Hostnamectl Maybe it helps
There is no command named Hostnamectl, but there is one named hostnamectl. Linux is very, very case sensitive. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Cool, hope that everything keeps working for you.
However, I'd second Gordon in that, IMO, you shouldn't need to run system-upgrade to get the final release if you already installed F24 Beta (just "dnf upgrade" should get you there), see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_from_pre-release_to_final
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Jim Cromie jim.cromie@gmail.com wrote:
thank you all for your answers, I'll try to be complete here, but brief 1st, Im not having any troubles - normal ops are fine, sudo dnf update works, etc.
only oddity is with dual boot - 1st few attempts to boot win10 failed after installing 24-beta (not an upgrade from f23). But recent attempts now seem to work, theyre just a little thrashy (iirc, the bios seems to boot 2x - 2 toshiba splash screens) but it gets there. This is my 1st EFI bios machine, so I dont have anything to compare it to.
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four)
[jimc@buffy ~]$ more /etc/system-release*: ::::::::::::: /etc/system-release :::::::::::::: Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) :::::::::::::: /etc/system-release-cpe :::::::::::::: cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:24
So thos are good, but I dont know whether any of these said "beta" anywhere before final release
[jimc@buffy ~]$ rpm -qil fedora-release Name : fedora-release Version : 24 Release : 2 Architecture: noarch Install Date: Mon 27 Jun 2016 02:10:28 PM MDT
my /etc/os-release matches Darios but again I dont know if it said beta earlier.
[jimc@buffy etc]$ dnf repoquery --duplicated Last metadata expiration check: 0:36:45 ago on Tue Jun 28 10:02:03 2016. so that looks clean
$ cat /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.json {"upgrade_status": null, "download_status": null}
which seems kind-of empty, and counter to what Rick Stevens expected in it, but again I dont know how it looked before..
to satisfy curiosity, I ran:
[jimc@buffy dnf]$ pwd /var/lib/dnf [jimc@buffy dnf]$ sudo strings history/history-2016-05-04.sqlite | less
saw lots of 'fc24', but no 'beta's other than (mostly) taglib packages.
at this point, things are fine, so Im not gonna sweat the off-chance that I might still be at "Beta" - all the packages upgraded to final.
In a few weeks I'll be back to those fc23 boxes, will do those upgrades, and if that suggests anything pertinent here (longshot) I'll follow up here.
thanks again y'all
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
If the major version is not sufficient, "cat /etc/issue.net" or "cat /etc/issue".
{^_^}
On 2016-06-27 14:22, jdow wrote:
uname -a
{^_^}
On 2016-06-27 14:20, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
heres what I get now:
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
that error suggests upgrade completed. BUT
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot Error: system is not ready for upgrade
that could be either because it isnt ready (for an unobvious reason) or because its already complete, and not ready for F25 yet
Im pretty sure I ran this or similar shortly after final, but I also ran it on several other boxes, without keeping notes, so not sure of current state (on any of them :-(
-d 7 seems to say Ive succeeded....
]$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 timer: config: 3 ms cachedir: /var/cache/dnf Loaded plugins: generate_completion_cache, download, copr, reposync, protected_packages, system-upgrade, noroot, config-manager, playground, Query, needs-restarting, debuginfo-install, builddep, langpacks langpacks: No languages are enabled Error reading file : /var/lib/dnf/plugins/langpacks/installed_langpacks as it does not exist initialized Langpacks plugin DNF version: 1.1.9 Command: dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever 24 --allowerasing --best -d 7 Installroot: / Releasever: 24 Base command: system-upgrade Extra commands: ['download'] Cleaning up. Error: Need a --releasever greater than the current system version.
If youve succeeded in your install, what happens if you do this ??
dnf system-upgrade reboot -d 7
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Il giorno lun, 27/06/2016 alle 14.49 -0700, jdow ha scritto:
If the major version is not sufficient, "cat /etc/issue.net" or "cat /etc/issue".
"cat /etc/issue*" does not show helpful information.
Use "cat /etc/os-release"
[lesca@dodo ~]$ cat /etc/os-release NAME=Fedora VERSION="24 (Workstation Edition)" ID=fedora VERSION_ID=24 PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 24 (Workstation Edition)" ANSI_COLOR="0;34" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:24" HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=24 REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=24 PRIVACY_POLICY_URL=https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy VARIANT="Workstation Edition" VARIANT_ID=workstation
-- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 24 Workstation)
On 06/27/2016 02:20 PM, Jim Cromie wrote:
I installed Fc24 beta a month ago on a new laptop Ive tried upgrading to 24-final, unsure Ive succeeded.
If you upgraded to the beta, then "dnf update" has (or will) update to the final release. You don't need to run "dnf system-upgrade" again.
-
Dario Lesca -
Gordon Messmer -
jdow -
Jim Cromie -
Joe Zeff -
Michal Domonkos -
Rick Stevens -
Stefano Cislaghi