Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
On Saturday, July 31, 2010, D. VITELLIUS REGULUS liberty@policeone.com wrote:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
not sure what you mean by install. If you mean a util like yum or rpm then the answer is no. If you want to execute a wondows .exe then you have to run wine and gove that filename as the arg
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 12:35 -0600, JD wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010, D. VITELLIUS REGULUS liberty@policeone.com wrote:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
[...]
If you want to execute a wondows .exe then you have to run wine
Or a Windows virtual machine.
poc
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 06:13:21 pm D. VITELLIUS REGULUS did opine:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
I get the impression this one came from a hacker, looking for some way to exploit linux.
If you come back again, please come back with a believable name, and a believable return address. This msg sets off all sorts of red lights and alarms.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Gene Heskett gene.heskett@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 06:13:21 pm D. VITELLIUS REGULUS did opine:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
I get the impression this one came from a hacker, looking for some way to exploit linux.
If you come back again, please come back with a believable name, and a believable return address. This msg sets off all sorts of red lights and alarms.
Can you elaborate a bit? The OP is apparently a member of a PoliceOne. Have you actually taken a look at that site?
"PoliceOne.com is the #1 resource for up-to-the-minute law enforcement information online. More than 200,000 police professionals nationwide are registered PoliceOne members and trust us to provide them with the most timely, accurate and useful information available anywhere. At PoliceOne, we take your safety and protection of law enforcement sensitive information we provide very seriously. We confirm the status of all officers registering for PoliceOne by calling that officer’s department directly. Our mission is to provide you with leading edge information and resources that make you better able to protect your communities and stay safer on the streets."
So how is his return address not believable and why do you feel the need to call him out on it even if it's not? He asked a pretty simple question, got a pretty simple answer, and was happy with it. What gives you the right to call him a "hacker" and besmirch his name, fictional or not, on this public list?
On Sunday, August 01, 2010 01:48:26 am Christofer C. Bell did opine:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Gene Heskett gene.heskett@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 06:13:21 pm D. VITELLIUS REGULUS did opine:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
I get the impression this one came from a hacker, looking for some way to exploit linux.
If you come back again, please come back with a believable name, and a believable return address. This msg sets off all sorts of red lights and alarms.
Can you elaborate a bit? The OP is apparently a member of a PoliceOne. Have you actually taken a look at that site?
"PoliceOne.com is the #1 resource for up-to-the-minute law enforcement information online. More than 200,000 police professionals nationwide are registered PoliceOne members and trust us to provide them with the most timely, accurate and useful information available anywhere. At PoliceOne, we take your safety and protection of law enforcement sensitive information we provide very seriously. We confirm the status of all officers registering for PoliceOne by calling that officer’s department directly. Our mission is to provide you with leading edge information and resources that make you better able to protect your communities and stay safer on the streets."
So how is his return address not believable and why do you feel the need to call him out on it even if it's not? He asked a pretty simple question, got a pretty simple answer, and was happy with it. What gives you the right to call him a "hacker" and besmirch his name, fictional or not, on this public list?
I was just there again, and I did not find the text pasted above even after I cleared the site with no-script.
On 08/01/2010 06:15 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 06:13:21 pm D. VITELLIUS REGULUS did opine:
Is there any programs i can use to install .exe files to Fedora 13?
Investigator, Embassy Investigations.
I get the impression this one came from a hacker, looking for some way to exploit linux.
If you come back again, please come back with a believable name, and a believable return address. This msg sets off all sorts of red lights and alarms.
What in blue blazes have you been drinking today? The only ones this sets off alarm bells with are the overly paranoid. Do you really think anyone in their right mind would come to this list looking for "hacker" advice? Are any of the discussions on this list ever remotely suggestive of this being a "go to" list for hacker info? Gee...and don't you think that if anyone were that silly to think this list as a good source they would use a generic email address like "gmail.com"? What do we know about anyone from gmail.com on this list?
Besides....
Look at the darn email headers...oh...maybe gmail hides that from you...
Received: from dm0206.mta.everyone.net (sj1-slb03-gw2.sj2.proofpoint.com [172.16.1.96]) by imta-38.everyone.net with ESMTP id qcrtng2r5-1 for users@lists.fedoraproject.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:26:15 -0700
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ host -t mx policeone.com policeone.com mail is handled by 5 sitemail.everyone.net.
Kind of matches up don't you think?
Do your home work. Don't jump to conclusions with little to go on.... Or, better yet, don't jump at all.
Hi Bill on July 5 you replied kindly on my message. The last few days i mean to have solved the problem by facing out LVM. As you said LVM adds considerable overhead and makes the system error prone. What previousely has been on an lv is now on a real partition. Serial disk access is now twice as fast as with LVM, you see that when resuming from hibernation: 116 MB/s as opposed to 60 MB/s
suomi
fedora wrote:
Hi listers
i got file system errors on a new machine (hw errors should therefore not be an issue, also smartctl does not indicate any errors), which holds two disks on SATA controllers. Both disks contain a fully fleged Fedora 13, so that i can boot from either of them.
i usually boot from the first disk, and i take care not to cross-mount the second disk or to unmount cross-mounts before hibernating.
[root at myws ~]# uname -a Linux myws.lan 2.6.33.5-124.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 11 09:38:12 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root at myws ~]#
The complete log of a boot cycle follows in the next message.
The file systems error manifests itself as follows in /var/log/messages:
Jul 5 07:04:59 myws kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 136802 Jul 5 07:04:59 myws kernel: EXT4-fs error (device dm-0): ext4_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 136803
When this error occurs i can no longer do such simple things as
touch /tmp/abcd.txt
which at this time gives me "No such file or directory"
to shut down the system, i usually use the hibernate function (i.e. save to the swap space), i mostly do not reboot the system. But then, after some resume/thaw cycles from the swap space, the above error happens, and i have to reboot.
when rebooting, the system goes through one ore two fsck cycles whith "File System has been modified, reboot needed" and reboots itself.
when the system comes up after that, the above error does not happen anymore, but i am not sure, whether the system is in the same state as before, i.e. i am not sure, whether i have lost data.
As you can see from the boot-log, the system has 4 CPUs, which made me think that this is a "write barriers" issue, but from kernel 2.6.31 on, write barriers in multi processor systems should pose no problems any
more.
questions:
- is this a heavy issue, i.e. does this "error" corrupt my system with
time?
- what can i do to avoid this ext4 error, it it were an error? going
back to ext3 is considered no solution.
thanks for any hints.
You have multiple boot drives, LVM, barriers with SMP, and repeated hibernate. You didn't mention compiling with suspend2 patches (or whatever it's called today), have you done that, too? I would start by not hibernating and seeing if that's the issue, turn off barriers and see if that's the issue. Right now you call this an ext4 problem, but I've been running TB of storage on ext4 since the early FC9 days, and not having issues. But stock hibernate has issues on some of my machines, barrier code is still changing and has had issues with SMP in the past, and LVM is really not needed unless things are likely to change (and adds overhead, and possibly has issues with barriers).
I have the feeling that you have an overly high ratio of solution to problem on the complexity scale.
Don't hijack threads. Just because you changed the Subject line it doesn't make it OK.
poc
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 13:08 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Do your home work. Don't jump to conclusions with little to go on.... Or, better yet, don't jump at all.
---- consider the source.
Craig
-
Christofer C. Bell -
Craig White -
Ed Greshko -
fedora -
Frank Murphy -
Gene Heskett -
JD -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
robert beatty