10:43 a.m.
Hello,
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
Thank
--
======================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)kegtux.org
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
======================================================================
9:56 a.m.
Allegedly, on or about 11 March 2013, Reindl Harald sent:
does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Of course it does. And three alternative ways to do it. And three
totally wrong answers. This is a mailing list.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.7.9-101.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 18 22:04:06 UTC 2013 x86_64
All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point
trying to privately email me, I will only read messages posted to the
public lists.
My apologies for not including a virus with this message, but I don't
use Windows.
5:03 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
Maybe this will help:
<http://search.gmane.org/?query=&group=gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.gener...
Cheers,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
10:33 p.m.
On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 08:13 +1030, Tim wrote:
Reindl Harald sent:
>>> does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Tim:
>> Of course it does
Reindl Harald:
> it DOES NOT because ALL THREE answers are the same
> as also your reply 22 hours later was useless
It seems that your sarcasm sensor is as absent as your tact.
+1
[...]
And your common sense seems to be lacking, too. Does it not occur
to
you that several people fetched their mail, saw a question, and saw no
answer to it, and all answered around about the same time? The
datestamps of their replies certainly suggest that this was the case in
this instance. Few people are going to be anal enough to sit there and
try and fetch new mail several times before replying, just to see if
someone else responds before they try.
If everyone waited to see if someone else replied before they reply
themselves ... (the rest is left as an exercise for the reader). In a
loosely-coordinated distributed system such as a mailing list, there is
no "solution" to this "problem".
poc
5:46 p.m.
On 03/12/2013 06:44 PM, Doug wrote:
On 03/12/2013 06:30 PM, poma wrote:
> On 03/11/13 16:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
>> list?
>>
> They are lost in infinity.
>
> poma
>
>
If they were actually published to the list and shown to the
world, then you can probably find them via Google. Put
in the subject, or maybe your email address, or some way
to identify them. I was surprised to find that Google seems
to monitor emails. (Maybe only their own?)
--doug
I've used Google Search to find email from my other email addresses as
well.....I don't think it's only their own the can track...not sure
though....that would be interesting to find out.
EGO II
5:44 p.m.
On 03/12/2013 06:30 PM, poma wrote:
On 03/11/13 16:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
> list?
>
They are lost in infinity.
poma
If they were actually published to the list and shown to the
world, then you can probably find them via Google. Put
in the subject, or maybe your email address, or some way
to identify them. I was surprised to find that Google seems
to monitor emails. (Maybe only their own?)
--doug
--
Blessed are the peacemakers...for they shall be shot at from both sides. A.M. Greeley
4:56 p.m.
Am 12.03.2013 22:43, schrieb Tim:
Reindl Harald sent:
>>> does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Tim:
>> Of course it does
Reindl Harald:
> it DOES NOT because ALL THREE answers are the same
> as also your reply 22 hours later was useless
It seems that your sarcasm sensor is as absent as your tact
it seems you should understand the sarcasm DOES NOT work
and have no place on a INTERNATIONAL mailing-list because
sarcasm in e-mail GENERALLY does not work between persons
which do not know each other
so better before post sarcastic mails without flag them
1 day later be quiet at all
And if you had any tact, as is woefully absent in masses of your
replies, you might realise why you end up getting the occasional
sarcastic response (you piss people off something chronic)
better be able to respond within a minute to questions with the
correct answer and links as have a lot of tact but spam useless
a day later
4:43 p.m.
Reindl Harald sent:
>> does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Tim:
> Of course it does
Reindl Harald:
it DOES NOT because ALL THREE answers are the same
as also your reply 22 hours later was useless
It seems that your sarcasm sensor is as absent as your tact.
If you'd been on this list as long as I have, you'd have noticed that
the general trend to the responses to someone's question is often
similar to what I've said (several answers the same, several
alternatives, and some plainly wrong ones).
And if you had any tact, as is woefully absent in masses of your
replies, you might realise why you end up getting the occasional
sarcastic response (you piss people off something chronic).
Develop some tact, or get used to the occasional sarcastic response, or
even being told directly not to be such an asshat.
> This is a mailing list.
this does NOT mean that there is any need to reply blindly
with the same anwer which was given two times while the first
CORRECT reply came within a minute
And your common sense seems to be lacking, too. Does it not occur to
you that several people fetched their mail, saw a question, and saw no
answer to it, and all answered around about the same time? The
datestamps of their replies certainly suggest that this was the case in
this instance. Few people are going to be anal enough to sit there and
try and fetch new mail several times before replying, just to see if
someone else responds before they try.
That, and people often not sorting their mail in a threaded fashion, so
they don't see replies that are already there, often results in several
replies to a query.
Oh, and before you go accusing me of being some sort of NetNazi, I wrote
this sharp response to because you were being one.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
10:13 a.m.
Am 12.03.2013 15:56, schrieb Tim:
Allegedly, on or about 11 March 2013, Reindl Harald sent:
> does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Of course it does
it DOES NOT because ALL THREE answers are the same
as also your reply 22 hours later was useless
And three alternative ways to do it
not really
And three totally wrong answers
which of the answers below is wrong?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
you read there "To see the collection of prior postings to the list,
visit the users Archives" linked with
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
so WHAT is your exactly problem?
This is a mailing list.
this does NOT mean that there is any need to reply blindly
with the same anwer which was given two times while the first
CORRECT reply came within a minute
_______________________________________________________________
Am 11.03.2013 16:43, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
https://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+users+list+archive
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
_______________________________________________________________
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
Patrick Dupre <Patrick.Dupre(a)univ-littoral.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
>
Hi Patrick,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________________________
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
11:56 a.m.
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 16:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 16:50, schrieb Tom Horsley:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
>> How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
>> list?
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
Presumably three people answered without seeing the others' answers,
which may not even have reached them before they answered themselves.
Happens all the time on mailing lists.
poc
10:53 a.m.
Am 11.03.2013 16:50, schrieb Tom Horsley:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
> How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
> list?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
does it really need THREE TIMES the same answer?
10:50 a.m.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
10:46 a.m.
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:43:04 +0100
Patrick Dupre <Patrick.Dupre(a)univ-littoral.fr> wrote:
Hello,
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
Hi Patrick,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Regards,
Frank
http//www.frankly3d.com
10:44 a.m.
Am 11.03.2013 16:43, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
How can I access to the previous mails that I submitted to the
list?
https://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+users+list+archive
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/
4061
days inactive
4063
days old
14 comments
10 participants
participants (10)
-
Doug -
EGO-II.1 -
Frank Murphy -
Patrick Dupre -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
poma -
Reindl Harald -
Suvayu Ali -
Tim -
Tom Horsley