Hi All,
I need a second pair of eye here. I think I am typo'ing something
On the third server, I am trying to upgrade xrdp to match the first two
On two Fedora 30 servers,
$ rpm -qa xrdp xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
$ dnf whatprovides xrdp ... xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64 : Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server Repo : @System Matched from: Provide : xrdp = 1:0.9.10-1.fc30
But on a third, I get
# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 30 (Thirty)
# rpm -qa xrdp xrdp-0.9.2-12.fc26.x86_64
# dnf --enablerepo=* whatprovides xrdp Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:47 ago on Fri 07 Jun 2019 12:31:00 PM PDT. Error: No Matches found
# dnf --enablerepo=* upgrade xrdp Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:40 ago on Fri 07 Jun 2019 12:31:00 PM PDT. No match for argument: xrdp Error: No packages marked for upgrade.
# dnf --enablerepo=* install xrdp Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:59 ago on Fri 07 Jun 2019 12:31:00 PM PDT. No match for argument: xrdp Error: Unable to find a match
Now it gets even weirder. I download xrdp from the repo:
# dnf install xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:22 ago on Fri 07 Jun 2019 12:30:06 PM PDT. No match for argument: xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64 Error: Unable to find a match
This worked:
# rpm -Uvh xrdp-selinux-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm ...Cleaning up / removing... 3:xrdp-1:0.9.2-12.fc26 [100%]
# rpm -qa xrdp xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
I am really confused!
-T
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
d
On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
d
Both should work the same in this instance.
It is just that dnf does not think xrdp exists either on the repos or locally! ????????????????????
Data Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:42:59 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org napisał(a):
On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
Both should work the same in this instance. It is just that dnf does not think xrdp exists either on the repos or locally! ????????????????????
The only reason I can image is that xrdp was added to exclude list. Every .repo file can have exclude line, so grep dnf directory for it: sudo grep -r 'xclude' /etc/dnf/
On 6/9/19 3:17 AM, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
Data Fri, 7 Jun 2019 16:42:59 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org napisał(a):
On 6/7/19 1:07 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:54:40 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users users@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
I am really confused!
me too, why use dnf in one case and rpm in another?
Both should work the same in this instance. It is just that dnf does not think xrdp exists either on the repos or locally! ????????????????????
The only reason I can image is that xrdp was added to exclude list. Every .repo file can have exclude line, so grep dnf directory for it: sudo grep -r 'xclude' /etc/dnf/
You called it!
$ grep -r 'xclude' /etc/dnf/ /etc/dnf/dnf.conf:excludepkgs=xrdp xorgxrdp
Thank you!
Sweet grep command. I am writing that one down!