aeskulap and dicom files

[Gregory P. Ennis]

Everyone,

Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 and
before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 

Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a good
product.

Greg Ennis

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 and
>  before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 
>
>  Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a good
>  product. 
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very
active or maintained application.  The last release was in 2007.  It is possible that with
changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?

If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your
F22 system.

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Gregory P. Ennis]

On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 and
>  > before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 
>  > 
>  > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a good
>  > product.
>  
>  Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't 
>  appear to be a very active or maintained application.  The last 
>  release was in 2007.  It is possible that with changes to system 
>  libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
>  
>  If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and 
>  installing it on your F22 system.
>  
>  -- 
>  Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
>  - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 
Ed,

Thanks for your response.  That was a good idea, but I did not get very
far :

[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64

I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, 
sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the
package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.

This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not
added to it since 2007.

If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.

Greg

[Dr J Austin]

On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 and
>  > > before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 
>  > > 
>  > > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a good
>  > > product.
>  > 
>  > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't 
>  > appear to be a very active or maintained application.  The last 
>  > release was in 2007.  It is possible that with changes to system 
>  > libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
>  > 
>  > If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and 
>  > installing it on your F22 system.
>  > 
>  > -- 
>  > Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
>  > - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4
>  
>  Ed,
>  
>  Thanks for your response.  That was a good idea, but I did not get very
>  far :
>  
>  [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
>  error: Failed dependencies:
>  libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  
>  I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, 
>  sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the
>  package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
>  
>  This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not
>  added to it since 2007.
>  
>  If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
>  
>  Greg
>   

Hi

This worked OK for me

I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately

2015_07_10

Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror
Installed on F22 as follows
dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm

Hope it helps

John

========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
 Package                                                 Arch                             
             
   Version                                                         Repository             
             
                    Size
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
Installing:
 CharLS                                                  x86_64                           
             
   1.0-8.fc21                                                      fedora                 
             
                    66 k
 aeskulap                                                x86_64                           
             
   0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21                                            @commandline           
             
                   1.1 M
 dcmtk                                                   x86_64                           
             
   3.6.0-18.fc21                                                   fedora                 
             
                   3.9 M
 gconfmm26                                               x86_64                           
             
   2.28.3-8.fc21                                                   fedora                 
             
                    46 k
 libglademm24                                            x86_64                           
             
   2.6.7-11.fc21                                                   fedora                 
             
                    42 k

Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================
========================================================================================================
=========================
Install  5 Packages

[Gregory P. Ennis]

On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 17:48 +0100, John Austin wrote:
>  On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  > > On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > > > Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22.  I had it on F21 
>  > > > and
>  > > > before.  It was a very decent dicom viewer. 
>  > > > 
>  > > > Does anyone know why this was not included in F22.  It was a 
>  > > > good
>  > > > product.
>  > > 
>  > > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't 
>  > > 
>  > > appear to be a very active or maintained application.  The last 
>  > > release was in 2007.  It is possible that with changes to system 
>  > > libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
>  > > 
>  > > If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and 
>  > > installing it on your F22 system.
>  > > 
>  > > -- 
>  > > Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about 
>  > > Fedora 
>  > > - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4
>  > 
>  > Ed,
>  > 
>  > Thanks for your response.  That was a good idea, but I did not get 
>  > very
>  > far :
>  > 
>  > [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
>  > error: Failed dependencies:
>  > libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2
>  > -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
>  > 
>  > I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, 
>  > sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain 
>  > the
>  > package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
>  > 
>  > This was really an excellent product even though the developer has 
>  > not
>  > added to it since 2007.
>  > 
>  > If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
>  > 
>  > Greg
>  > 
>  
>  
>  Hi
>  
>  This worked OK for me
>  
>  I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
>  
>  2015_07_10
>  
>  Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror
>  Installed on F22 as follows
>  dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2
>  -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
>  
>  Hope it helps
>  
>  John
>  
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =========================
>   Package                                                 Arch        
>                                     
>     Version                                                        
>   Repository                           
>                      Size
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =========================
>  Installing:
>   CharLS                                                  x86_64      
>                                     
>     1.0-8.fc21                                                     
>   fedora                               
>                      66 k
>   aeskulap                                                x86_64      
>                                     
>     0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21                                           
>   @commandline                         
>                     1.1 M
>   dcmtk                                                   x86_64      
>                                     
>     3.6.0-18.fc21                                                  
>   fedora                               
>                     3.9 M
>   gconfmm26                                               x86_64      
>                                     
>     2.28.3-8.fc21                                                  
>   fedora                               
>                      46 k
>   libglademm24                                            x86_64      
>                                     
>     2.6.7-11.fc21                                                  
>   fedora                               
>                      42 k
>  
>  Transaction Summary
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =====================================================================
>  ===================================
>  =========================
>  Install  5 Packages 
John,

Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using.  Here is
what I got

Greg

>  [root@HmGe f21]# dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
>  -0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm      
>  Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64                       
>     1.2 MB/s | 9.3 MB     00:07     
>  Fedora 21 - x86_64                                                   
>     2.8 MB/s |  39 MB     00:14     
>  RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free - Updates                            
>     1.1 MB/s | 400 kB     00:00     
>  Adobe Systems Incorporated                                           
>      65 kB/s | 1.8 kB     00:00    
>  RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree - Updates                         
>     620 kB/s | 137 kB     00:00    
>  RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free                                      
>     1.9 MB/s | 508 kB     00:00    
>  Fedora 21 - x86_64 - Updates                                         
>     3.2 MB/s |  23 MB     00:07    
>  RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree                                   
>     460 kB/s | 179 kB     00:00    
>  Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Sat Jul 11 
>  12:34:05 2015.
>  Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires 
>  libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
>  installed

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using.  Here is
>  what I got 
I used

dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap

And it install just fine as well.  It installed a total of 5 packages from F21.

 CharLS             x86_64       1.0-8.fc21                    fedora        66 k
 aeskulap           x86_64       0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21          fedora       1.1 M
 dcmtk              x86_64       3.6.0-18.fc21                 fedora       3.9 M
 gconfmm26          x86_64       2.28.3-8.fc21                 fedora        46 k
 libglademm24       x86_64       2.6.7-11.fc21                 fedora        42 k

And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Gregory P. Ennis]

On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 16:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using.  Here is
>  > what I got
>  
>  I used
>  
>  dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
>  
>  And it install just fine as well.  It installed a total of 5 packages 
>  from F21.
>  
>   CharLS             x86_64       1.0-8.fc21                    fedora
>          66 k
>   aeskulap           x86_64       0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21          fedora
>         1.1 M
>   dcmtk              x86_64       3.6.0-18.fc21                 fedora
>         3.9 M
>   gconfmm26          x86_64       2.28.3-8.fc21                 fedora
>          46 k
>   libglademm24       x86_64       2.6.7-11.fc21                 fedora
>          42 k
>  
>  And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6
>  
>  -- 
>  Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
>  - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 
Ed,

Thank you for your reply.  I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would
work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back.  Thanks again!!!!!

I also received some communication from Ankur Sinha who is the
maintainer, and it appears that putting aeskulap in f22 is on todo
list.

Thanks again to all of you to help me get this functionally on f22.

Greg

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  Thank you for your reply.  I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this
> would
>  work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back.  Thanks again!!!!! 
You're welcome.

You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they
get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Gregory P. Ennis]

On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > Thank you for your reply.  I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this 
>  > would
>  > work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back.  Thanks again!!!!!
>  
>  You're welcome.
>  
>  You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 
>  packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your 
>  system.
>  
>  -- 
>  Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
>  - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 
Great thought........ thanks!!!

Greg

[Gregory P. Ennis]

Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:43:50 -0500

On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>  > Thank you for your reply.  I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this 
>  > would
>  > work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back.  Thanks again!!!!!
>  
>  You're welcome.
>  
>  You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 
>  packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your 
>  system.
>  
>  -- 
>  Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora 
>  - https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4 
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone,

I have been in dialog with the Fedora maintainer of aeskulap, Ankur
Sinha, and he is working to get it ready for F22.  He has filled a bug
report for dcmtk.

Ankur's response to one of my e-mails is as follows:
>  
>  No worries. I looked at the error, but it probably requires me to look
>  into dcmtk changes to fix it. I've filed a bug here for the time
>  being:
>  
>  https://github.com/pipelka/aeskulap/issues/2
>  
>  This seems to be the original author of aeskulap, so I'm hopeful that
>  we'll have a fix. 
Greg

[Bob Goodwin]

On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the
> F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system. 
.

Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I 
didn't see a place in dnf.conf?

Bob

-- 
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/12/15 21:39, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>  On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so
> they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
>  .
>
>  Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I
> didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
>  
man dnf.conf  has all the gory details.  Read the section "Options for Both [Main]
and Repo"


-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Bob Goodwin]

On 12/07/15 09:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > >Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the
> update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
> > >
>  man dnf.conf  has all the gory details.  Read the section "Options for Both [Main]
> and Repo"
>  
.

[main]
gpgcheck=1
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=true
exclude=fc21


Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21?

Googling hasn't helped ...


-- 
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/12/15 22:29, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
>  gpgcheck=1
>  installonly_limit=3
>  clean_requirements_on_remove=true
>  exclude=fc21
>
>
>  Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21?
>
>  Googling hasn't helped ... 
In this particular case I would make it

exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24

Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run.  It is clear
from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different version of
a needed library.

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Bob Goodwin]

On 12/07/15 10:36, Ed Greshko wrote:
>  In this particular case I would make it
>
>  exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24
>
>  Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run.  It is
> clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different
> version of a needed library. 
.

Ok, did that. Will see how it goes.

Thanks,

Bob

-- 
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
box10  FEDORA-22/64bit LINUX XFCE

[Pete Travis]

On Jul 11, 2015 12:38 PM, "Gregory P. Ennis" <PoMec(a)pomec.net&gt; wrote:
>  
>  > > [root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf
> aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
>  > > error: Failed dependencies: 
`rpm` knows about dependencies but does not pull other packages to resolve
them.  That's dnf's job.  Use dnf, do not use rpm directly.

...

> John,
>  
> Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using.
 Here is
> what I got
>  
> Greg
>  
> > [root@HmGe f21]# dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21
install aeskulap
> > -0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> > Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64
> >    1.2 MB/s | 9.3 MB     00:07

You are not running Enterprise Linux 7.  This repo is not for Fedora.
Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems.

--Pete

[Gregory P. Ennis]

You are not running Enterprise Linux 7.  This repo is not for Fedora.
Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems.

--Pete
--------------------------------------------------------

Thanks Pete .... finally figured that out too.

Greg

[Heinz Diehl]

On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote: 

>  dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install
> aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 
On my F22 machine, this ends up with:

Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires
libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed

Btw: there is also ginkgo-cadx. It's not as good as aeskulap, and
doesn't compile on Fedora (but does on Arch). Here's the error:

/usr/local/src/srcpkg/ginkgocadx-3.6.1.1367.34/src/cadxcore/api/initwx.cpp:67:42:
fatal error: vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h: No such file or directory

This is because vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h was removed from
vtk. So if anybody wants to spend some time on it... (not me).

[Ed Greshko]

On 07/12/15 00:48, John Austin wrote:
>  This worked OK for me
>
>  I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
>
>  2015_07_10
>
>  Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror
>  Installed on F22 as follows
>  dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm 
Yes, that would be the best way to go.

I got my test VM back up and working and

dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap

worked fine for me as well.

-- 
Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora -
https://youtu.be/ZArl8fTfub4

[Bob Marcan]

On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:00:52 -0500
"Gregory P. Ennis" <PoMec(a)PoMec.Net&gt; wrote:

>  > Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it
> doesn't 
>  > appear to be a very active or maintained application.  The last 
>  > release was in 2007.  It is possible that with changes to system 
>  > libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
>  >  
Just tried to rebuild aeskulap on F22. Too many errors.

What about http://amide.sourceforge.net/ ?
Rebuild was done without any problems.
Dependencies are  in Fedora repository.
I can see demo images (error on the initial window).
Unfortunately i can't find the CD with my own images to look at it.
If you have problems to rebuild the package, 
i can send you .rpm and .srpm.

BR, Bob