Everyone,
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product.
Greg Ennis
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product.
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system.
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product.
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system.
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
Ed,
Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far :
[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.ankur@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007.
If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
Greg
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product.
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system.
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
Ed,
Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far :
[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.ankur@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007.
If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
Greg
Hi
This worked OK for me
I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
2015_07_10
Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
Hope it helps
John
======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Installing: CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k
Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================== ======================================================================================================== ========================= Install 5 Packages
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 17:48 +0100, John Austin wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-11 at 11:00 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 10:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/10/15 09:20, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Looks like aeskulap was not included in F22. I had it on F21 and before. It was a very decent dicom viewer.
Does anyone know why this was not included in F22. It was a good product.
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't
appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
If you need it, why don't you try downloading the F21 rpm and installing it on your F22 system.
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
Ed,
Thanks for your response. That was a good idea, but I did not get very far :
[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimage.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmimgle.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmjpeg.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libdcmnet.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg12.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg16.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libijg8.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 liboflog.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 libofstd.so.3.6()(64bit) is needed by aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64
I have tried to contact the maintainer of f21 aeskulap, sanjay.ankur@gmail.com, to see if I could persuade him to maintain the package for f22, but I he has not responded yet.
This was really an excellent product even though the developer has not added to it since 2007.
If anyone else has ideas I would appreciate suggestions.
Greg
Hi
This worked OK for me
I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
2015_07_10
Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2 -0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
Hope it helps
John
=====================================================================
=====================================================================
========================= Package Arch
Version Repository Size ===================================================================== =================================== ===================================================================== =================================== ========================= Installing: CharLS x86_64
1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64
0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 @commandline 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64
3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64
2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64
2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k
Transaction Summary
===================================
===================================
Install 5 Packages
John,
Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got
Greg
[root@HmGe f21]# dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap -0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 1.2 MB/s | 9.3 MB 00:07 Fedora 21 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 39 MB 00:14 RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free - Updates 1.1 MB/s | 400 kB 00:00 Adobe Systems Incorporated 65 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree - Updates 620 kB/s | 137 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Free 1.9 MB/s | 508 kB 00:00 Fedora 21 - x86_64 - Updates 3.2 MB/s | 23 MB 00:07 RPM Fusion for Fedora 21 - Nonfree 460 kB/s | 179 kB 00:00 Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Sat Jul 11 12:34:05 2015. Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got
I used
dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
And it install just fine as well. It installed a total of 5 packages from F21.
CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 fedora 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k
And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 16:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/12/15 01:38, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got
I used
dnf -- nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
And it install just fine as well. It installed a total of 5 packages from F21.
CharLS x86_64 1.0-8.fc21 fedora 66 k aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21 fedora 1.1 M dcmtk x86_64 3.6.0-18.fc21 fedora 3.9 M gconfmm26 x86_64 2.28.3-8.fc21 fedora 46 k libglademm24 x86_64 2.6.7-11.fc21 fedora 42 k
And I found that dcmtk supplied libdcmdata.so.3.6
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
Ed,
Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!!!!!
I also received some communication from Ankur Sinha who is the maintainer, and it appears that putting aeskulap in f22 is on todo list.
Thanks again to all of you to help me get this functionally on f22.
Greg
On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!!!!!
You're welcome.
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!!!!!
You're welcome.
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
Great thought........ thanks!!!
Greg
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:43:50 -0500
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 19:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/12/15 19:23, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I had to remove f22 dcmtk before this would work, but at least I have my DICOM viewer back. Thanks again!!!!!
You're welcome.
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
-- Sorta what I want to say when folks habitually complain about Fedora
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone,
I have been in dialog with the Fedora maintainer of aeskulap, Ankur Sinha, and he is working to get it ready for F22. He has filled a bug report for dcmtk.
Ankur's response to one of my e-mails is as follows:
No worries. I looked at the error, but it probably requires me to look into dcmtk changes to fix it. I've filed a bug here for the time being:
https://github.com/pipelka/aeskulap/issues/2
This seems to be the original author of aeskulap, so I'm hopeful that we'll have a fix.
Greg
On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
.
Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
Bob
On 07/12/15 21:39, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 12/07/15 07:35, Ed Greshko wrote:
You may want to add an "exclude" in your dnf.conf for the F21 packages so they get skipped the next time you do an update to your system.
.
Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
man dnf.conf has all the gory details. Read the section "Options for Both [Main] and Repo"
On 12/07/15 09:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
Where does the "exclude" go, other than in the update commend perhaps, I didn't see a place in dnf.conf?
man dnf.conf has all the gory details. Read the section "Options for Both [Main] and Repo"
.
[main] gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=true exclude=fc21
Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21?
Googling hasn't helped ...
On 07/12/15 22:29, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
gpgcheck=1 installonly_limit=3 clean_requirements_on_remove=true exclude=fc21
Do you think this would be sufficient, or perhaps it needs exclude=*fc21?
Googling hasn't helped ...
In this particular case I would make it
exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24
Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run. It is clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different version of a needed library.
On 12/07/15 10:36, Ed Greshko wrote:
In this particular case I would make it
exclude=CharLS,dcmtk,gconfmm26,libglademm24
Since those are the packages needed from F21 to get aeskulap from F21 to run. It is clear from other info that updating dcmtk will break it since it supplies a different version of a needed library.
.
Ok, did that. Will see how it goes.
Thanks,
Bob
On Jul 11, 2015 12:38 PM, "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@pomec.net wrote:
[root@HmGe f21]# rpm -Uhvf aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies:
`rpm` knows about dependencies but does not pull other packages to resolve them. That's dnf's job. Use dnf, do not use rpm directly.
...
John,
Can you give me a list of what repositories you are using. Here is what I got
Greg
[root@HmGe f21]# dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap -0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 1.2 MB/s | 9.3 MB 00:07
You are not running Enterprise Linux 7. This repo is not for Fedora. Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems.
--Pete
You are not running Enterprise Linux 7. This repo is not for Fedora. Using it will cause conflicts and unpredictable problems.
--Pete --------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Pete .... finally figured that out too.
Greg
On 11.07.2015, John Austin wrote:
dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
On my F22 machine, this ends up with:
Error: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.3.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
Btw: there is also ginkgo-cadx. It's not as good as aeskulap, and doesn't compile on Fedora (but does on Arch). Here's the error:
/usr/local/src/srcpkg/ginkgocadx-3.6.1.1367.34/src/cadxcore/api/initwx.cpp:67:42: fatal error: vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h: No such file or directory
This is because vtkThreadedStreamingPipeline.h was removed from vtk. So if anybody wants to spend some time on it... (not me).
On 07/12/15 00:48, John Austin wrote:
This worked OK for me
I don't even think I needed to download aeskulap separately
2015_07_10
Down loaded aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm from F21 mirror Installed on F22 as follows dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
Yes, that would be the best way to go.
I got my test VM back up and working and
dnf --nogpgcheck --releasever=21 install aeskulap
worked fine for me as well.
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:00:52 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
Looking at their website, http://aeskulap.nongnu.org/, it doesn't appear to be a very active or maintained application. The last release was in 2007. It is possible that with changes to system libraries other factors it became too hard to build and maintain?
Just tried to rebuild aeskulap on F22. Too many errors.
What about http://amide.sourceforge.net/ ? Rebuild was done without any problems. Dependencies are in Fedora repository. I can see demo images (error on the initial window). Unfortunately i can't find the CD with my own images to look at it. If you have problems to rebuild the package, i can send you .rpm and .srpm.
BR, Bob
-
Bob Goodwin -
Bob Marcan -
Dr J Austin -
Ed Greshko -
Gregory P. Ennis -
Gregory P. Ennis
-
Heinz Diehl -
Pete Travis