12:16 p.m.
Hello,
Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
Are they the same ?
Should I just use --nodeps ?
Thank.
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================
9:48 a.m.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 11:24 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>>>> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
>>>>> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3
> RSA/SHA256
>>>>> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
>>>>> Preparing...
> ###########################################
>>>>> [100%]
>>>>> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
>>>>> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>>>>> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>>>>>
>>>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
>>>>> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
>>>>> Are they the same ?
>>>>> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>>>>>
>>>> ----
>>>> if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
>>>>
>>>> it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older
> one
>>>>
>>> Thank.
>>>
>>> Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
>>> If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
>>> (yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
>>>
>> ----
>> # rpm -q --whatrequires faad2-libs
>> ffmpeg-libs-0.5-2.fc11.i586
>> mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11.i586
>> xmms-faad2-2.7-1.fc11.i586
>> faad2-devel-2.7-1.fc11.i586
>>
>> I don't know where you got libfaad2-1.2.7-16 from but it seems to be
> a
>> problem here.
>
> It is weird.
> rpm -q --whatrequires libfaad2
> no package requires libfaad2
>
> rpm -e libfaad2
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libfaad.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
> xine-lib-1.1.16.3-20.fc11.x86_64
----
# rpm -q --info xine-lib
Name : xine-lib Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 1.1.16.3 Vendor: Fedora Project
Release : 2.fc11 Build Date: Fri 10 Apr 2009
08:26:28 AM MST
Install Date: Fri 25 Sep 2009 04:56:24 PM MST Build Host:
x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM:
xine-lib-1.1.16.3-2.fc11.src.rpm
Size : 5747545 License: GPLv2+
Signature : RSA/8, Thu 16 Apr 2009 08:54:31 PM MST, Key ID
1dc5c758d22e77f2
Packager : Fedora Project
URL : http://xinehq.de/
Summary : A multimedia engine
Description :
This package contains the Xine library. It can be used to play back
various media, decode multimedia files from local disk drives, and
display
multimedia streamed over the Internet. It interprets many of the most
common multimedia formats available - and some uncommon formats, too.
I don't know where you are getting these packages from because they are
clearly not fedora/rpmfusion packages and I think that if you are going
to go off the reservation, you need to powwow with the other chieftans.
I am still very confuse.
I removed xine-ui.
BUt if I try to remove xine-lib then I need to remove 74 packages
Removing:
xine-lib x86_64 1.1.16.3-20.fc11 installed
5.8 M
Removing for dependencies:
PyKDE4 x86_64 4.3.1-3.fc11 installed
20 M
PyQt4 x86_64 4.5.4-1.fc11 installed
13 M
amarok x86_64 2.1.1-4.fc11 installed
17 M
amarok-utils x86_64 2.1.1-4.fc11 installed
313 k
bluez x86_64 4.42-5.fc11 installed
1.1 M
digikam x86_64 0.10.0-2.fc11 installed
24 M
digikam-doc noarch 0.9.4-3.fc11 installed
59 M
digikam-libs x86_64 0.10.0-2.fc11 installed
3.9 M
kaffeine x86_64 0.8.7-7.fc11 installed
6.1 M
kde-settings-pulseaudio noarch 4.2-12.1 installed
0.0
kdeaccessibility x86_64 1:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
8.3 M
kdeaccessibility-libs x86_64 1:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
181 k
kdeartwork-kxs x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
216 k
kdeartwork-screensavers x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
3.2 M
kdebase x86_64 6:4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
12 M
kdebase-libs x86_64 6:4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
763 k
kdebase-runtime x86_64 4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
13 M
kdebase-runtime-libs x86_64 4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
4.9 M
kdebase-workspace x86_64 4.3.1-9.fc11 installed
27 M
kdebase-workspace-libs x86_64 4.3.1-9.fc11 installed
2.3 M
kdebluetooth x86_64 1:0.3-3.fc11 installed
383 k
kdeedu-marble x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
18 M
kdeedu-marble-libs x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
2.2 M
kdegraphics x86_64 7:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
6.9 M
kdegraphics-libs x86_64 7:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
2.7 M
kdelibs x86_64 6:4.3.1-3.fc11 installed
45 M
kdelibs-experimental x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
97 k
kdemultimedia x86_64 6:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
4.2 M
kdemultimedia-libs x86_64 6:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
919 k
kdenetwork x86_64 7:4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
20 M
kdenetwork-libs x86_64 7:4.3.1-2.fc11 installed
5.2 M
kdepim x86_64 6:4.3.1-5.fc11 installed
22 M
kdepim-libs x86_64 6:4.3.1-5.fc11 installed
22 M
kdepim-runtime x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
3.6 M
kdepim-runtime-libs x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
852 k
kdepimlibs x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
6.8 M
kdepimlibs-akonadi x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
1.3 M
kdeplasma-addons x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
6.2 M
kdeplasma-addons-libs x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
1.1 M
kdeutils x86_64 6:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
5.8 M
kdeutils-libs x86_64 6:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
1.4 M
kdeutils-printer-applet x86_64 6:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
160 k
kdm x86_64 4.3.1-9.fc11 installed
3.3 M
kio_msits x86_64 7:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
33 k
kio_sysinfo x86_64 20090620-1.fc11 installed
496 k
kipi-plugins x86_64 0.5.0-1.fc11 installed
15 M
konq-plugins x86_64 4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
5.3 M
kpackagekit x86_64 0.4.2-0.fc11 installed
2.2 M
ksshaskpass x86_64 0.5.1-3.fc11 installed
32 k
ktorrent x86_64 3.2.3-3.fc11 installed
8.4 M
ktorrent-libs x86_64 3.2.3-3.fc11 installed
1.5 M
lyx x86_64 1.6.4-1.fc11 installed
7.8 M
lyx-common noarch 1.6.4-1.fc11 installed
28 M
paraview x86_64 3.6.1-6.fc11 installed
92 M
paraview-data noarch 3.6.1-6.fc11 installed
2.0 k
paraview-doc noarch 3.6.1-6.fc11 installed
13 M
phonon x86_64 4.3.1-6.fc11.1 installed
442 k
phonon-backend-xine x86_64 4.3.1-6.fc11.1 installed
408 k
pinentry-qt x86_64 0.7.6-1.fc11 installed
129 k
polkit-qt x86_64 0.9.2-1.fc11 installed
136 k
poppler-qt4 x86_64 0.10.7-2.fc11 installed
458 k
pulseaudio-module-bluetooth x86_64 0.9.15-17.fc11 installed
208 k
qedje x86_64 0.4.0-1.fc11 installed
246 k
qimageblitz x86_64 0.0.4-0.5.svn706674.fc11 installed
116 k
qt-x11 x86_64 1:4.5.2-3.fc11 installed
43 M
qtscriptbindings x86_64 0.1.0-5.fc11 installed
20 M
qzion x86_64 0.4.0-1.fc11 installed
173 k
scim-bridge-qt x86_64 0.4.15.2-3.fc11 installed
112 k
scribus x86_64 1.3.5.1-1.fc11 installed
47 M
scribus-doc noarch 1.3.5.1-1.fc11 installed
9.7 M
system-config-printer-kde x86_64 7:4.3.1-1.fc11 installed
419 k
taglib-extras x86_64 0.1.6-1.fc11 installed
182 k
veusz x86_64 1.4-1.fc11 installed
3.3 M
And if I do rpm -e xine-lib:
error: Failed dependencies:
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
kaffeine-0.8.7-7.fc11.x86_64
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
phonon-backend-xine-4.3.1-6.fc11.1.x86_64
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
kdemultimedia-libs-6:4.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
kdebase-runtime-4.3.1-2.fc11.x86_64
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
kdebase-runtime-libs-4.3.1-2.fc11.x86_64
libxine.so.1()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
kdemultimedia-6:4.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64
xine-lib-pulseaudio is needed by (installed)
kde-settings-pulseaudio-4.2-12.1.noarch
What is the best option ?
Thank.
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================
10:19 a.m.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> What is the best option ?
> Thank.
The problem is caused by some badly behaving repositories that you have
enabled. What repositories do you have in use? Please send the output of
# yum repolist
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
repo id repo name
status
adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated
enabled: 17
fedora Fedora 11 - x86_64
enabled: 16,577
livna rpm.livna.org for 11 - x86_64
enabled: 3
rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Free
enabled: 423
rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 - Free -
Updates enabled: 409
rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 -
Nonfree enabled: 121
rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 11 -
Nonfree - Updates enabled: 214
updates Fedora 11 - x86_64 - Updates
enabled: 6,957
repolist: 24,721
A
You need to remove the unnecessary repositories (keep just Fedora
&
RPMFusion), remove the packages that haven't come from those repos and
replace them with the versions from the repos mentioned above.
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================
9:59 a.m.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:48 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
What is the best option ?
Thank.
The problem is caused by some badly behaving repositories that you have
enabled. What repositories do you have in use? Please send the output of
# yum repolist
to the list.
You need to remove the unnecessary repositories (keep just Fedora &
RPMFusion), remove the packages that haven't come from those repos and
replace them with the versions from the repos mentioned above.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org
5:24 a.m.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 21:08 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:16 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
>>>
>>> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
>>> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
>>> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
>>> Preparing... ###########################################
>>> [100%]
>>> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
>>> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>>> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>>>
>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
>>> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>>>
>>> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
>>> Are they the same ?
>>> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>>>
>> ----
>> if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
>>
>> it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older one
>>
> Thank.
>
> Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
> If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
> (yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
>
----
# rpm -q --whatrequires faad2-libs
ffmpeg-libs-0.5-2.fc11.i586
mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11.i586
xmms-faad2-2.7-1.fc11.i586
faad2-devel-2.7-1.fc11.i586
I don't know where you got libfaad2-1.2.7-16 from but it seems to be a
problem here.
It is weird.
rpm -q --whatrequires libfaad2
no package requires libfaad2
rpm -e libfaad2
error: Failed dependencies:
libfaad.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
xine-lib-1.1.16.3-20.fc11.x86_64
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================
3:19 p.m.
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 21:08 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:16 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
>>
>> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
>> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
>> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
>> Preparing... ###########################################
>> [100%]
>> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
>> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>>
>> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
>> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>>
>> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
>> Are they the same ?
>> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>>
> ----
> if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
>
> it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older one
>
Thank.
Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
(yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
----
# rpm -q --whatrequires faad2-libs
ffmpeg-libs-0.5-2.fc11.i586
mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11.i586
xmms-faad2-2.7-1.fc11.i586
faad2-devel-2.7-1.fc11.i586
I don't know where you got libfaad2-1.2.7-16 from but it seems to be a
problem here.
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:08 p.m.
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:16 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
>
> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
> Preparing... ###########################################
> [100%]
> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>
> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>
> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
> Are they the same ?
> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>
----
if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older one
Thank.
Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
(yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
Regards.
--
---
==========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | |
Department of Chemistry | | Phone: (44)-(0)-1904-434384
The University of York | | Fax: (44)-(0)-1904-432516
Heslington | |
York YO10 5DD United Kingdom | | email: pd520(a)york.ac.uk
==========================================================================
2:42 p.m.
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:16 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
Trying to install mplayer I get the conflicting package:
rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
Are they the same ?
Should I just use --nodeps ?
----
if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older one
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
8:07 a.m.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 11:24 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>>>> rpm -Uvh /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
>>>> warning: /tmp/faad2-libs-2.7-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm: Header V3
RSA/SHA256
>>>> signature: NOKEY, key ID 8fcff4da
>>>> Preparing...
###########################################
>>>> [100%]
>>>> file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of
>>>> faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
>>>> libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc11.x86_6
>>>>
>>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0
>>>> libfaad2-2.7-16.fc11.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> It seems that libfaad.so.2 be delivered by 2 different pacakges !
>>>> Are they the same ?
>>>> Should I just use --nodeps ?
>>>>
>>> ----
>>> if you have to ask, --nodeps is always a bad idea
>>>
>>> it seems you are trying to replace a newer libfaad2 with an older
one
>>>
>> Thank.
>>
>> Do you mean that faad-libs is an older version than libfaad2 ?
>> If yes, why mplayer requires faad2-libs and not libfaad2 ?
>> (yum install mplayer from rpmfusion).
>>
> ----
> # rpm -q --whatrequires faad2-libs
> ffmpeg-libs-0.5-2.fc11.i586
> mplayer-1.0-0.109.20090329svn.fc11.i586
> xmms-faad2-2.7-1.fc11.i586
> faad2-devel-2.7-1.fc11.i586
>
> I don't know where you got libfaad2-1.2.7-16 from but it seems to be
a
> problem here.
It is weird.
rpm -q --whatrequires libfaad2
no package requires libfaad2
rpm -e libfaad2
error: Failed dependencies:
libfaad.so.2()(64bit) is needed by (installed)
xine-lib-1.1.16.3-20.fc11.x86_64
----
# rpm -q --info xine-lib
Name : xine-lib Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 1.1.16.3 Vendor: Fedora Project
Release : 2.fc11 Build Date: Fri 10 Apr 2009
08:26:28 AM MST
Install Date: Fri 25 Sep 2009 04:56:24 PM MST Build Host:
x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com
Group : System Environment/Libraries Source RPM:
xine-lib-1.1.16.3-2.fc11.src.rpm
Size : 5747545 License: GPLv2+
Signature : RSA/8, Thu 16 Apr 2009 08:54:31 PM MST, Key ID
1dc5c758d22e77f2
Packager : Fedora Project
URL : http://xinehq.de/
Summary : A multimedia engine
Description :
This package contains the Xine library. It can be used to play back
various media, decode multimedia files from local disk drives, and
display
multimedia streamed over the Internet. It interprets many of the most
common multimedia formats available - and some uncommon formats, too.
I don't know where you are getting these packages from because they are
clearly not fedora/rpmfusion packages and I think that if you are going
to go off the reservation, you need to powwow with the other chieftans.
Craig
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
5318
days inactive
5319
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Craig White -
Patrick Dupre -
Susi Lehtola