Hi, i have Problems with yum update. It updates nothing since yesterday, it cannot resolve dependencies of the nfs-utils package.
Here is the error message:
Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package nfs-utils.i386 0:1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
before i delete thenfs-utils package, to update all other packages.
After creating the link, all errors are gone.
My system is a core 5 fresh install updated with yum.
On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:37, Jörn Rink wrote:
Hi, i have Problems with yum update. It updates nothing since yesterday, it cannot resolve dependencies of the nfs-utils package.
Here is the error message:
Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package nfs-utils.i386 0:1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
before i delete thenfs-utils package, to update all other packages.
After creating the link, all errors are gone.
My system is a core 5 fresh install updated with yum.
I have the same problem on both of my systems.
Regards, Jeroen
Fedora Users - J.L. Coenders wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:37, Jorn Rink wrote:
Hi, i have Problems with yum update. It updates nothing since yesterday, it cannot resolve dependencies of the nfs-utils package.
I have the same problem on both of my systems.
Regards, Jeroen
This problem is already discussed on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-July/msg00020.html
Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Fedora Users - J.L. Coenders wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:37, Jorn Rink wrote:
Hi, i have Problems with yum update. It updates nothing since yesterday, it cannot resolve dependencies of the nfs-utils package.
I have the same problem on both of my systems.
...
This problem is already discussed on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2006-July/msg00020.html
If you use the graphical pup (software updater), it is pretty easy to uncheck the problematic packages, so that the update (sans those two packages) will actually complete.
DaveT.
David Timms wrote:
If you use the graphical pup (software updater), it is pretty easy to uncheck the problematic packages, so that the update (sans those two packages) will actually complete.
Actually the problem seems more difficult, in my case at least. "yum update" is still looking for packages required by nfs-utils, even though it is not looking for nfs-utils itself. Does anyone understand this?
-------------------------------------------- Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libgssapi.i386 0:0.9-1.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils --------------------------------------------
I should say that this doesn't worry me in the least - I am perfectly happy to wait until nfs-utils is sorted out. But I am puzzled as to why yum is looking for packages required by nfs-utils, but not for nfs-utils itself.
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 19:13 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
David Timms wrote:
If you use the graphical pup (software updater), it is pretty easy to uncheck the problematic packages, so that the update (sans those two packages) will actually complete.
Actually the problem seems more difficult, in my case at least. "yum update" is still looking for packages required by nfs-utils, even though it is not looking for nfs-utils itself. Does anyone understand this?
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libgssapi.i386 0:0.9-1.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
The problem is that it it trying to update nfs-utils-lib and libgssapi but not updating nfs-utils to match due to a naming/dependency error on the repo. Yum does not see the nfs-utils package as being newer so it ignores the new package.
I should say that this doesn't worry me in the least - I am perfectly happy to wait until nfs-utils is sorted out. But I am puzzled as to why yum is looking for packages required by nfs-utils, but not for nfs-utils itself.
-- Timothy Murphy e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 19:13 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
David Timms wrote:
If you use the graphical pup (software updater), it is pretty easy to uncheck the problematic packages, so that the update (sans those two packages) will actually complete.
Actually the problem seems more difficult, in my case at least. "yum update" is still looking for packages required by nfs-utils, even though it is not looking for nfs-utils itself. Does anyone understand this?
Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package libgssapi.i386 0:0.9-1.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
I should say that this doesn't worry me in the least - I am perfectly happy to wait until nfs-utils is sorted out. But I am puzzled as to why yum is looking for packages required by nfs-utils, but not for nfs-utils itself.
The version of nfs-utils already installed on your system was linked against libgssapi.so.1
Yum is proposing to update libgssapi to a version containing libgssapi.so.2, but can't do that because it would break your existing nfs-utils.
There is a later version of nfs-utils in the updates repository that is built against libgssapi.so.2 and which would solve the problem, but due to a package naming error, it appears to yum and rpm as being older than the one you already have installed, and so yum doesn't consider using it.
The problem has been fixed by releasing an nfs-utils update that appears "newer" to yum and rpm than any previous release.
Paul.
On Sunday 02 July 2006 13:25, Fedora Users - J.L. Coenders wrote:
On Sunday 02 July 2006 10:37, Jörn Rink wrote:
Hi, i have Problems with yum update. It updates nothing since yesterday, it cannot resolve dependencies of the nfs-utils package.
Here is the error message:
Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package nfs-utils.i386 0:1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Processing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 for package: nfs-utils --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: librpcsecgss.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils Error: Missing Dependency: libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
before i delete thenfs-utils package, to update all other packages.
After creating the link, all errors are gone.
My system is a core 5 fresh install updated with yum.
I have the same problem on both of my systems.
Regards, Jeroen
For me, the issue seems to be solved with the new package release.
Regards, Jeroen