Questioned on orphaned package? aespipe orphaned but it compiles fine??

[Michael D. Setzer II]

Was recommended to run 
package-cleanup --orphans

Originally it found about 240 older files from previous 
versions of linux an I've cleaned most out after doing 
checks.
Running command now (-v 7.3 is due to having 
LibreOffice 7.3 installed from libreoffie site that has them 
listed). Some are packages loaded directly from rpm files, 
and glade3 ones show lots of other things would be 
removed. Issue is with aespipe.

package-cleanup --orphans | grep -v 7.3
aespipe-0:2.4f-1.fc33.x86_64
glade3-libgladeui-2:3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64
glade3-libgladeui-devel-2:3.8.6-8.fc32.x86_64
msttcorefonts-0:2.5-1.noarch
peazip-0:8.7.0.LINUX.GTK2-1.x86_64
reiserfs-utils-2:3.6.27-4.fc34.x86_64
uni2ascii-0:4.18-3.1.x86_64
xpr-0:1.0.5-2.fc34.x86_64

Have question on aespipe.
aespipe-2.4f-1.fc33.x86_64
78544 Aug 10  2020 /usr/bin/aespipe
Found a bugzilla report that shows it failed to compile 
with Fedora 34, and would be  removed??
Just downloaded it from site and compiled it just fine on 
Fedora 35.
./aespipe --version
usage: ./aespipe [options] <inputfile >outputfile
version 2.4f  Copyright (c) 2002-2019 Jari Ruusu, (c) 2001 
Dr Brian Gladman
compiling and then running strip on it result in
72240 Jul  2 04:21 aespipe

So, not sure what the compile errors where, and since it 
showed as closed couldn't make comments.

+------------------------------------------------------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor (Retired)     
 mailto:[e-mail]                            
 mailto:[e-mail]
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins                        
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+

[Samuel Sieb]

On 7/1/22 21:38, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> Have question on aespipe.
> aespipe-2.4f-1.fc33.x86_64
> 78544 Aug 10  2020 /usr/bin/aespipe
> Found a bugzilla report that shows it failed to compile with Fedora 34, 
> and would be  removed??
> Just downloaded it from site and compiled it just fine on Fedora 35.
> ./aespipe --version
> usage: ./aespipe [options] <inputfile >outputfile
> version 2.4f  Copyright (c) 2002-2019 Jari Ruusu, (c) 2001 Dr Brian Gladman
> compiling and then running strip on it result in
> 72240 Jul  2 04:21 aespipe
> So, not sure what the compile errors where, and since it showed as 
> closed couldn't make comments.

It failed to build on F34 for some reason and no one took care of it. 
Maybe it was already orphaned.  So the automatic retiring process happened.

There's no point in commenting on the old bug since there is currently 
no maintainer for the package anyway.

[Michael D. Setzer II]

On 1 Jul 2022 at 23:06, Samuel Sieb wrote:

Date sent:      	Fri, 1 Jul 2022 23:06:25 -0700
Subject:        	Re: Questioned on orphaned package? 
aespipe orphaned but it compiles
    fine??
To:             	[e-mail]
From:           	Samuel Sieb 
Send reply to:  	Community support for Fedora 
users
> On 7/1/22 21:38, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
> > Have question on aespipe.
> > aespipe-2.4f-1.fc33.x86_64
> > 78544 Aug 10  2020 /usr/bin/aespipe
> > Found a bugzilla report that shows it failed to compile with Fedora 34, 
> > and would be  removed??
> > Just downloaded it from site and compiled it just fine on Fedora 35.
> > ./aespipe --version
> > usage: ./aespipe [options] <inputfile >outputfile
> > version 2.4f  Copyright (c) 2002-2019 Jari Ruusu, (c) 2001 Dr Brian Gladman
> > compiling and then running strip on it result in
> > 72240 Jul  2 04:21 aespipe
> > So, not sure what the compile errors where, and since it showed as 
> > closed couldn't make comments.
>
> It failed to build on F34 for some reason and no one took care of it. 
> Maybe it was already orphaned.  So the automatic retiring process happened.
>
> There's no point in commenting on the old bug since there is currently 
> no maintainer for the package anyway.

http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/aespipe/aespipe-v2.4f.tar.bz2
Is the link
aespipe-v2.4f.tar.bz2      2019-10-02 07:08  105K

There is another loop-aes at 3.7 but it doesn't have the 
aespipe inside it.

Guess I could just install the package compiled from 
source after removing the Fedora package that has been 
orphaned?

Had a user of my G4L project that asked for method to 
incrypt image files, so had manually added the aespipe. 
Then found that Fedora had it in repo, so changed to 
using it, now guess have to go back.

Would have been nice if they mentioned what error was, 
or who maintainer was. 
Thanks for the reply.
> users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

+------------------------------------------------------------+
 Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor 
(Retired)     
 mailto:[e-mail]                            
 mailto:[e-mail]
 Guam - Where America's Day Begins                        
 G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/
+------------------------------------------------------------+