VeryNice is a tool for dynamically adjusting the nice-level of processes.
- http://www.tam.cornell.edu/~sdh4/verynice/
... there is a specific (an better) tool for FC3 or I must use this?
Many thanks.
Dario,
Dario Lesca wrote:
VeryNice is a tool for dynamically adjusting the nice-level of processes.
... there is a specific (an better) tool for FC3 or I must use this?
apprich@elmstreet apprich $ nice --help Usage: nice [OPTION] [COMMAND [ARG]...] Run COMMAND with an adjusted scheduling priority. With no COMMAND, print the current scheduling priority. ADJUST is 10 by default. Range goes from -20 (highest priority) to 19 (lowest).
-n, --adjustment=ADJUST increment priority by ADJUST first --help display this help and exit --version output version information and exit
Report bugs to bug-coreutils@gnu.org.
apprich@elmstreet apprich $ which nice /bin/nice
apprich@elmstreet apprich $ rpm -qf `which nice` coreutils-5.2.1-31
Many thanks.
Alex
Il gio, 2005-04-07 alle 13:42, Alexander Apprich ha scritto:
Alex
Thanks Alex... But VeryNice is a daemon which make very more than nice:
... Unlike most other process re-nice tools, VeryNice is not only capable of lowering a CPU bound process's priority (raising the nice level), but it is also capable of raising the priority back up when the process is no longer heavily using the CPU. It is also configurable, so it can detect different users and different programs and act accordingly. For example.... ...This daemon, in the default configuration will:
* renice CPU hungry processes to 'nicer' levels * renice multimedia applications to 'less nice' levels. * renice, and eventually kill, particular applications that have been known to die and eat CPU: netscape, Fvwm, xfig, and gimp. * Allow central and per-user configurations.
My question is: I must continue to use verynice or in FC3 is included something of similar to use?
Thanks.
On Apr 7, 2005 8:45 AM, Dario Lesca d.lesca@solinos.it wrote:
My question is: I must continue to use verynice or in FC3 is included something of similar to use?
You're going to want to continue using VeryNice. I wouldn't mind seeing VeryNice looked at for inclusion in Fedora Extras.
On Apr 8, 2005 1:33 AM, Christofer C. Bell christofer.c.bell@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 2005 8:45 AM, Dario Lesca d.lesca@solinos.it wrote:
My question is: I must continue to use verynice or in FC3 is included something of similar to use?
You're going to want to continue using VeryNice. I wouldn't mind seeing VeryNice looked at for inclusion in Fedora Extras.
If you are interested in doing this
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines