People,
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
The only thing that was odd was when downloading RPMs (console) parts of one line would be duplicated over the whole screen and then letters would start disappearing (an odd screensaver thing?) - I don't know what that was about but it was just a display thing and pushing SHIFT caused a sensible output again.
The only package issue was some dependency problem with pdftk but I will worry about that later.
Thanks again people!
Regards,
Phil.
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skipbroken
And it says....
fedup: error: argument --network: invalid VERSION value: '21'
Can anyone make a suggestion about what to try next ?
On 12/03/14 20:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skipbroken
And it says....
fedup: error: argument --network: invalid VERSION value: '21'
Can anyone make a suggestion about what to try next ?
Drop the instrepo
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21 /x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
I've also tried....
rpm --import https://fedoraproject.org/static/95A43F54.txt yum update yum yum clean all yum --releasever=21 distro-sync --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
And it says .....
Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64 (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20) Requires: libswresample.so.0(LIBSWRESAMPLE_0)(64bit) Removing: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free- updates/20) libswresample.so.0(LIBSWRESAMPLE_0)(64bit) Updated By: ffmpeg-libs-2.4.3-2.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) ~libswresample.so.1(LIBSWRESAMPLE_1)(64bit) Error: Package: libodfgen-0.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64 (@updates/20) Requires: libwpd-stream-0.9.so.9()(64bit) Removing: libwpd-0.9.9-1.fc20.x86_64 (@koji- override-0/$releasever) libwpd-stream-0.9.so.9()(64bit) Updated By: libwpd-0.10.0-3.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) Not found Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64 (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20) Requires: libavfilter.so.3(LIBAVFILTER_3)(64bit) Removing: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free- updates/20) libavfilter.so.3(LIBAVFILTER_3)(64bit) Updated By: ffmpeg-libs-2.4.3-2.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) ~libavfilter.so.5(LIBAVFILTER_5)(64bit) Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64 (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20) Requires: libavfilter.so.3()(64bit) Removing: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free- updates/20) libavfilter.so.3()(64bit) Updated By: ffmpeg-libs-2.4.3-2.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) ~libavfilter.so.5()(64bit) Error: firewalld-config-standard conflicts with fedora-release- workstation-21-2.noarch Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64 (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20) Requires: libswresample.so.0()(64bit) Removing: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free- updates/20) libswresample.so.0()(64bit) Updated By: ffmpeg-libs-2.4.3-2.fc21.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) ~libswresample.so.1()(64bit) Error: Package: libodfgen-0.0.4-1.fc20.x86_64 (@updates/20) Requires: libwpd-0.9.so.9()(64bit) Removing: libwpd-0.9.9-1.fc20.x86_64 (@koji- override-0/$releasever) libwpd-0.9.so.9()(64bit) Updated By: libwpd-0.10.0-3.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) ~libwpd-0.10.so.10()(64bit) ** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64
On 12/03/14 21:01, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
And it says .....
Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Package: ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64 (@/ffDiaporama-2.0.1.2013.1205-0.fc20.x86_64/20) Requires: libswresample.so.0(LIBSWRESAMPLE_0)(64bit) Removing: ffmpeg-libs-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free- updates/20)
Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment..... I don't think they have their act fully together at this time.
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote:
Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment..... I don't think they have their act fully together at this time.
Disabled those and it says...
Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Package: mpv-0.3.11-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates/20) Requires: libass.so.4()(64bit) Removing: libass-0.10.1-4.fc20.x86_64 (@fedora/20) libass.so.4()(64bit) Updated By: libass-0.12.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) ~libass.so.5()(64bit)
** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi- libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64 basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64 32:bind-license-9.9.6-3.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with 32:bind- license-9.9.4-15.P2.fc20.noarch
Is there a clever YUM command that can fix this ? Was thinking I might have to just re-install the system to upgrade.
On 12/03/14 21:47, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:22:29 Ed Greshko wrote:
Best to disable the rpmfusion repos at the moment..... I don't think they have their act fully together at this time.
Disabled those and it says...
Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Package: mpv-0.3.11-1.fc20.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates/20) Requires: libass.so.4()(64bit) Removing: libass-0.10.1-4.fc20.x86_64 (@fedora/20) libass.so.4()(64bit) Updated By: libass-0.12.0-1.fc21.x86_64 (fedora) ~libass.so.5()(64bit)
** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi- libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64 basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64 32:bind-license-9.9.6-3.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with 32:bind- license-9.9.4-15.P2.fc20.noarch
Is there a clever YUM command that can fix this ? Was thinking I might have to just re-install the system to upgrade.
package-cleanup --cleandupes
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:58:11 Ed Greshko wrote:
package-cleanup --cleandupes
I've tried that. Also tried...
package-cleanup --cleandupes --skip-broken
.. And it says ...
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Depsolving loop limit reached. ** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi- libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64 basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64
Looking a bit desperate.
On 12/03/14 22:15, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 21:58:11 Ed Greshko wrote:
package-cleanup --cleandupes
I've tried that. Also tried...
package-cleanup --cleandupes --skip-broken
.. And it says ...
--> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. Skip-broken could not solve problems Error: Depsolving loop limit reached. ** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64 avahi-libs-0.6.31-29.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with avahi- libs-0.6.31-21.fc20.x86_64 basesystem-10.0-10.fc21.noarch is a duplicate with basesystem-10.0-9.fc20.noarch bash-4.3.30-2.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with bash-4.2.53-1.fc20.x86_64
Looking a bit desperate.
Why are you adding --skip-broken ?
On 12/02/2014 10:54 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
Considering that Final RC4 came out this morning, I will continue to beta test and not update my production notebook for another week. I maintain a local repo for my testing, and lots of rpms were updated overnight. Perhaps none you or I use, but we are still seeing changes to the os directory and nothing yet in updates.
So make sure to run your 'yum update' regularly and expect updates for base, rather than update.
The only thing that was odd was when downloading RPMs (console) parts of one line would be duplicated over the whole screen and then letters would start disappearing (an odd screensaver thing?) - I don't know what that was about but it was just a display thing and pushing SHIFT caused a sensible output again.
The only package issue was some dependency problem with pdftk but I will worry about that later.
Thanks again people!
Regards,
Phil.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:08 +0000, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21 /x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
I've also tried....
rpm --import https://fedoraproject.org/static/95A43F54.txt
Why that? Yum would automatically offer a needed new key.
yum update yum yum clean all yum --releasever=21 distro-sync --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
And it says .....
Doubtful. Highly doubtful. Why? Because in the output you show there are F21 packages installed already. Next to F20 ones. Duplicates. A broken installation so to say. What have you done prior to the two upgrade attemps mentioned above?
** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64
On 12/03/2014 10:49 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:01:08 +0000, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21 /x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
I've also tried....
rpm --import https://fedoraproject.org/static/95A43F54.txt
Why that? Yum would automatically offer a needed new key.
From test-announce this morning:
NOTE: Signing of the RC4 tree is not yet complete, there are technical issues in releng preventing it working....
So don't be supprised if things don't work all the way yet.
yum update yum yum clean all yum --releasever=21 distro-sync --nogpgcheck --skip-broken
And it says .....
Doubtful. Highly doubtful. Why? Because in the output you show there are F21 packages installed already. Next to F20 ones. Duplicates. A broken installation so to say. What have you done prior to the two upgrade attemps mentioned above?
** Found 174 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: OpenEXR-libs-2.1.0-5.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with OpenEXR- libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64 SDL-1.2.15-17.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with SDL-1.2.15-13.fc20.x86_64 augeas-libs-1.2.0-4.fc21.x86_64 is a duplicate with augeas- libs-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64
On 12/03/2014 06:15 AM, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
Looking a bit desperate.
package-cleanup --dupes | grep fc20 >dupes.txt
Then, remove them one by one with yum or, if it won't cooperate, rpm. BTDT and it will take a lot of time, but if you're patient, you'll get things cleaned up enough that --cleandupes will work.
On 03.12.2014 13:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skipbroken
And it says....
fedup: error: argument --network: invalid VERSION value: '21'
Can anyone make a suggestion about what to try next ?
This is why are folks sent to the test list https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 21 ain't released yet, so you and others, please stop spamming this list for nothing.
On 12/03/2014 05:41 PM, poma wrote:
On 03.12.2014 13:02, Richard Ibbotson wrote:
I just updated from F20 x86_64 to F21 via fedup and although it took a while - it was completely painless!
I've tried this on my own fc20 workstation ....
fedup --network 21 -- instrepo=http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/21/x86_64/os/ --nogpgcheck --skipbroken
And it says....
fedup: error: argument --network: invalid VERSION value: '21'
Can anyone make a suggestion about what to try next ?
This is why are folks sent to the test list https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 21 ain't released yet, so you and others, please stop spamming this list for nothing.
And anyone that does fedup now is taking their system health in hand.
Wait a week.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:52:38 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
rpm --import https://fedoraproject.org/static/95A43F54.txt
Why that? Yum would automatically offer a needed new key.
From test-announce this morning:
NOTE: Signing of the RC4 tree is not yet complete, there are technical issues in releng preventing it working....
So don't be supprised if things don't work all the way yet.
That doesn't answer above question, but perhaps you didn't want that.
What I mean is: The Fedora 21 key is included with Fedora 20 since Nov 2013 or so, see /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/*fedora-21* and therefore it is available to Yum, for example.
Fedora 21 will be publicly available on Tuesday, December 09, 2014.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2014-December/000967...
-
Ed Greshko -
Joe Zeff -
Michael Schwendt -
Philip Rhoades -
poma -
Richard Ibbotson -
Robert Moskowitz