People,
On 2010-09-29 00:26, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Mark your calendars, and get ready to break out and have some fun: Fedora 14 will launch in early November. Fedora is the leading-edge, community- developed, free and open source operating system that continues to deliver innovative features to users worldwide, with a new release every six months.
But... what's that, you say? November is oh, so, far away? Never fear - Beta is here! Checking out the latest and greatest in Fedora's cutting-edge technologies is just a click away.
Stand out from the crowd. Get your taste of Fedora 14 ''now,'' by trying out our Beta release:
Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3?
Phil.
On 29 September 2010 08:37, Philip Rhoades phil@pricom.com.au wrote:
Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3?
No, that would be a big coincidence.
This is the copy in my local mirror, but it should work for you: http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/14-Beta/Live/i686/Fedora...
Piscium,
On 2010-09-29 19:09, Piscium wrote:
On 29 September 2010 08:37, Philip Rhoadesphil@pricom.com.au wrote:
Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3?
No, that would be a big coincidence.
This is the copy in my local mirror, but it should work for you: http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/14-Beta/Live/i686/Fedora...
All seems OK so why a new announcement when the iso is the same as the previous one (Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso)?
Phil.
Philip Rhoades <phil <at> pricom.com.au> writes:
Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3?
Beta is identical to Beta RC3. In general, for each of Alpha, Beta, and Final, one of the corresponding release candidates is chosen (usually, but not necessarily, the last one). You can verify this by comparing the unsigned checksum files for Beta RC3 with the corresponding signed ones for Beta. The only difference is the signature.
On 29 September 2010 10:37, Andre Robatino robatino@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Beta is identical to Beta RC3. In general, for each of Alpha, Beta, and Final, one of the corresponding release candidates is chosen (usually, but not necessarily, the last one). You can verify this by comparing the unsigned checksum files for Beta RC3 with the corresponding signed ones for Beta. The only difference is the signature.
Cool, one learns a new thing everyday.
On 29/09/10 10:32, Philip Rhoades wrote:
All seems OK so why a new announcement when the iso is the same as the previous one (Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso)?
Usually a wider test group for the Beta. hence the torrents
Is this release for mac also?
On 9/29/10 7:32 AM, "Frank Murphy" frankly3d@gmail.com wrote:
On 29/09/10 10:32, Philip Rhoades wrote:
All seems OK so why a new announcement when the iso is the same as the previous one (Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso)?
Usually a wider test group for the Beta. hence the torrents
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:09:39AM +0100, Piscium wrote:
On 29 September 2010 08:37, Philip Rhoades phil@pricom.com.au wrote:
Fedora-14-Beta-i686-Live-XFCE.iso has the same cksum as Beta RC3?
No, that would be a big coincidence.
This is the copy in my local mirror, but it should work for you: http://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/14-Beta/Live/i686/Fedora...
RC3 became the beta and all the isas are the same
Dennis
-
Andre Robatino -
Dennis Gilmore -
Frank Murphy -
Philip Rhoades -
Piscium -
ZL