8:08 p.m.
Hello,
I am unfamiliar on how to communicate in th users lists. I hope not to be breaking Code of
Conduct by sending this emal.
I have found Fedora a great working tool and need to upgrade from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34.
But the download in the Software app is giving the following error:
Error running transaction: file/usr/.build-id/c7/-dcd663e38adaac7a2d6d137c46f337ab5543cf
conflicts between attempted installs of openjfx8-80.202-26.b07.fc34x86_64 and
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34x86_64
Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
Thanks and regards
Enrique Feoli
9:14 p.m.
On 30/04/2021 09:08, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
I am unfamiliar on how to communicate in th users lists. I hope not
to be breaking Code of Conduct by sending this emal.
This is the way....
I have found Fedora a great working tool and need to upgrade from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34.
But the download in the Software app is giving the following error:
Error running transaction: file/usr/.build-id/c7/-dcd663e38adaac7a2d6d137c46f337ab5543cf
conflicts between attempted installs of openjfx8-80.202-26.b07.fc34x86_64 and
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34x86_64
Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
I'm not familiar with openjfx or openjf8 and I've not see this sort of error
before.
There are several things you can try.
system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=34 --allowerasing
or
system-upgrade --exclude=openjfx --exclude= openjfx8 --refresh --releasever=34
then upgrade them after the system upgrade has completed.
or
You can remove/erase those two packages, do the upgrade, and then add them back after the
upgrade is complete.
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
9:31 p.m.
On 4/29/21 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 30/04/2021 09:08, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
> I have found Fedora a great working tool and need to upgrade from
> Fedora 33 to Fedora 34. But the download in the Software app is giving
> the following error:
> Error running transaction:
> file/usr/.build-id/c7/-dcd663e38adaac7a2d6d137c46f337ab5543cf
> conflicts between attempted installs of
> openjfx8-80.202-26.b07.fc34x86_64 and openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34x86_64
>
> Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
I'm not familiar with openjfx or openjf8 and I've not see this sort of
error before.
There are several things you can try.
system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=34 --allowerasing
He's using Gnome Software. I don't know how to do that in there. Also,
that won't work for this issue. The transaction is fine until it checks
the files. Two packages are providing the same file. One solution is
to try removing openjfx and hope it doesn't remove too many things.
Another one is to add a "-x 'openjfx*'" and see if the transaction can
work.
9:39 p.m.
On 30/04/2021 10:31, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/29/21 7:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 30/04/2021 09:08, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
>> I have found Fedora a great working tool and need to upgrade from Fedora 33 to
Fedora 34. But the download in the Software app is giving the following error:
>> Error running transaction:
file/usr/.build-id/c7/-dcd663e38adaac7a2d6d137c46f337ab5543cf conflicts between attempted
installs of openjfx8-80.202-26.b07.fc34x86_64 and openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34x86_64
>>
>> Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
>
> I'm not familiar with openjfx or openjf8 and I've not see this sort of error
before.
>
> There are several things you can try.
>
> system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=34 --allowerasing
He's using Gnome Software. I don't know how to do that in there. Also, that
won't work for this issue. The transaction is fine until it checks the files. Two
packages are providing the same file. One solution is to try removing openjfx and hope it
doesn't remove too many things. Another one is to add a "-x
'openjfx*'" and see if the transaction can work.
Ah, yes. I missed the "download in the Software ap" statement.
FWIW, I should have done this earlier, I just tried installing those 2 packages on an
F34 VM and they won't install together. Maybe they aren't supposed to be both
installed?
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
12:23 a.m.
Am 30.04.2021 um 04:14 schrieb Ed Greshko
<ed.greshko(a)greshko.com>:
>
> Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
I'm not familiar with openjfx or openjf8 and I've not see this sort of error
before.
As far as I’m aware of you usually use openjfx and Java 11. If you are stuck with Java 8
for some reason you have to use openjfx8. I just don’t know if openjfx8 works with Java 11
as well. Never tried.
You can install Java 8 and Java 11 in parallel and the same should apply to
openjfx/openjfx8.
So it is likely to be a bug in the rpms. But you should be able to apply one of the
suggested workarounds without doing harm.
3:48 p.m.
Thnak you so much Ed for the guidance. I was able to download the
Fedora 34 distribution, removed the openjfix and openjfx8 packages,
plus the two files that appear in the error message
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/c7/dcd663e38adaac7a2d8d137c46f337ab5543cf
from install of openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
file /usr/lib/.build-id/e6/010f9c606facd1495fb823e9e767752537712b
from install of openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
However, when the command to instal is given the above error appears
repatedly, even after rebooting. Is there some kind of chace to clear?
Enrique
A las Jueves, 29-04-2021 en 20:14 Ed Greshko escribió:
On 30/04/2021 09:08, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
I am unfamiliar on how to communicate in th users lists. I hope not
to be breaking Code of Conduct by sending this emal.
This is the way....
I have found Fedora a great working tool and need to upgrade from
Fedora 33 to
Fedora 34. But the download in the Software app is giving
the following error:
Error running transaction:
file/usr/.build-id/c7/-dcd663e38adaac7a2d6d137c46f337ab5543cf
conflicts between attempted installs of
openjfx8-80.202-26.b07.fc34x86_64 and openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34x86_64
Would anyone help in fixing this problem?
I'm not familiar with openjfx or openjf8 and I've not see this sort of
error before.
There are several things you can try.
system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=34 --allowerasing
or
system-upgrade --exclude=openjfx --exclude= openjfx8 --refresh
--releasever=34
then upgrade them after the system upgrade has completed.
or
You can remove/erase those two packages, do the upgrade, and then add
them back after the
upgrade is complete.
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
5:06 p.m.
On 01/05/2021 04:48, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
Thnak you so much Ed for the guidance. I was able to download the
Fedora 34 distribution, removed the openjfix and openjfx8 packages, plus the two files
that appear in the error message
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/c7/dcd663e38adaac7a2d8d137c46f337ab5543cf from install of
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
file /usr/lib/.build-id/e6/010f9c606facd1495fb823e9e767752537712b from install of
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
However, when the command to instal is given the above error appears repatedly, even
after rebooting. Is there some kind of chace to clear?
Enrique
I believe you are saying that you now have upgraded and are running on F34.
You can "cat /etc/redhat-release) from the command line to verify.
Now the issue is you are trying to install both openjfix and openjfx8 and are getting
the error you show above.
According to Peter Boy's response on the list it is OK for both packages to be
installed.
If they fail to install, then there is a packaging problem with one or both of those
packages.
In that case, a bugzilla (bug report) should be filed with the goal of getting the
maintainer of the packages to fix the issue.
Makes sense?
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
5:17 p.m.
I am certain that I am still on F33. The download wenr fine, but
the transaction test shows the error below and will not allowe
installation, even with both packages removed, so it is clear that I
am not running F34. Would this be abug and reported to bugzilla? Or is
there a way to have the upgrade completed?.
A las Viernes, 30-04-2021 en 16:06 Ed Greshko escribió:
On 01/05/2021 04:48, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
Thnak you so much Ed for the guidance. I was able to download the
Fedora 34 distribution, removed the openjfix and openjfx8 packages,
plus the two files that appear in the error message
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/.build-id/c7/dcd663e38adaac7a2d8d137c46f337ab5543cf
from install of
openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
file /usr/lib/.build-id/e6/010f9c606facd1495fb823e9e767752537712b
from install of openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-4.fc34.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
However, when the command to instal is given the above error appears
repatedly, even after rebooting. Is there some kind of chace to clear?
Enrique
I believe you are saying that you now have upgraded and are running on
F34.
You can "cat /etc/redhat-release) from the command line to verify.
Now the issue is you are trying to install both openjfix and openjfx8
and are getting
the error you show above.
According to Peter Boy's response on the list it is OK for both
packages to be installed.
If they fail to install, then there is a packaging problem with one or
both of those packages.
In that case, a bugzilla (bug report) should be filed with the goal of
getting the
maintainer of the packages to fix the issue.
Makes sense?
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
5:24 p.m.
On 01/05/2021 06:17, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
I am certain that I am still on F33. The download wenr fine, but the
transaction test shows the error below and will not allowe installation, even with both
packages removed, so it is clear that I am not running F34. Would this be abug and
reported to bugzilla? Or is there a way to have the upgrade completed?.
That's "odd". Could you just send the result of typing this from the commad
line?
rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
You should get....
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
package openjfix is not installed
package openjfx8 is not installed
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
5:36 p.m.
This the result:
[efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
package openjfix is not installed
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
[efeoli@localhost ~]$
It looks as if openjfx8 was not removed. Perhaps I did not serached
well?
A las Viernes, 30-04-2021 en 16:24 Ed Greshko escribió:
On 01/05/2021 06:17, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
I am certain that I am still on F33. The download wenr fine, but the
transaction test shows the error below and will not allowe
installation, even with both packages removed, so it is clear that I
am not running F34. Would this be abug and reported to bugzilla? Or is
there a way to have the upgrade completed?.
That's "odd". Could you just send the result of typing this from the
commad line?
rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
You should get....
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
package openjfix is not installed
package openjfx8 is not installed
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
5:38 p.m.
On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
This the result:
[efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
package openjfix is not installed
openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
[efeoli@localhost ~]$
It looks as if openjfx8 was not removed. Perhaps I did not serached well?
OK.... You can do
sudo dnf erase openjfx8
from the command line to try and remove it again.
Then try the upgrade.
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
8:05 p.m.
Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
> This the result:
> [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
There is a typo in the command, it's openjfx, not openjfix.
An "i" snuck into the example command.
> package openjfix is not installed
> openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
The ".fc34" in the above should indicate that you're running
Fedora 34. If you're not, then you're running some hybrid
of 33 and 34, at the least. :)
sudo dnf erase openjfx8
Or perhaps:
sudo dnf erase 'openjfx*'
to ensure any of the openjfx subpackages are removed?
Though I'm not sure this matters if the upgrade actually
completed. Then the issue is simply that the two versions
of openjfx cannot be installed in parallel at the moment,
due to the file conflict.
--
Todd
8:17 p.m.
On 01/05/2021 09:05, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 01/05/2021 06:36, Feoli, Dr. Enrique via users wrote:
>> This the result:
>> [efeoli@localhost ~]$ rpm -q openjfix openjfx8
There is a typo in the command, it's openjfx, not openjfix.
An "i" snuck into the example command.
Thanks. I either need to update my glasses prescription or increase
my font sizes.
>> package openjfix is not installed
>> openjfx8-8.0.202-26.b07.fc34.x86_64
The ".fc34" in the above should indicate that you're running
Fedora 34. If you're not, then you're running some hybrid
of 33 and 34, at the least. :)
Missed that too. :-(
Though I'm not sure this matters if the upgrade actually
completed. Then the issue is simply that the two versions
of openjfx cannot be installed in parallel at the moment,
due to the file conflict.
Based on an off-list message, I think the update has now been completed.
I asked the OP to verify on-list.
--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
1088
days inactive
1089
days old
12 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Ed Greshko -
Feoli, Dr. Enrique -
Peter Boy -
Samuel Sieb -
Todd Zullinger