Hi all! Had to reinstall Viber, and now it fails to connect when I enter my number. Logs show the following:
Nov 04 14:14:09 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: /opt/viber/Viber: /lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by /opt/viber/Viber) Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_1_client_method Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_client_method Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_1_server_method Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve TLSv1_2_server_method Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_select_next_proto Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_CTX_set_next_proto_select_cb Nov 04 14:14:10 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: qt.network.ssl: QSslSocket: cannot resolve SSL_get0_next_proto_negotiated Nov 04 14:14:11 ksy org.gnome.Shell.desktop[2202]: Window manager warning: Invalid WM_TRANSIENT_FOR window 0x520000b specified for 0x520000a (Viber). Nov 04 14:14:11 ksy viber.desktop[12550]: QObject::connect: Cannot connect (null)::stateChanged(QNetworkSession::State) to QNetworkReplyHttpImpl::_q_networkSessionStateChanged(QNetworkSession::State)
ls -l /lib64/libcurl.so.4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 14 13:25 /lib64/libcurl.so.4 -> libcurl.so.4.4.0
uname -r 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64
rpm -qa | grep viber viber-6.0.1.5-2.x86_64
I have crated a support case but they just said "we will try to reproduce... bla bla" and closed my case. Can anybody help maybe?
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:03:00 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all! Had to reinstall Viber, and now it fails to connect when I enter my number. Logs show the following:
[snip]
I have crated a support case but they just said "we will try to reproduce... bla bla" and closed my case. Can anybody help maybe?
I've never used viber, so this is just generic help.
This doesn't seem to be a standard fedora package. Is it possible that it is looking for libcurl in /lib instead of /lib64? If it is, it won't find it on a 64 bit system.
If it was previously working though, that shouldn't be the issue. If you do an rpm -q --filesbypackage viber does it show a configuration file? Is it possible that you lost some custom configuration on re-install, and have to replace it?
What does their help say about configuration? Can you specify explicitly the path to the libcurl shared library on the command line?
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:21:04 -0700 stan stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:03:00 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all! Had to reinstall Viber, and now it fails to connect when I enter my number. Logs show the following:
[snip]
I have crated a support case but they just said "we will try to reproduce... bla bla" and closed my case. Can anybody help maybe?
I did a quick search on viber and found this link of someone having problems running it. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=298587 Their problem was that viber had hardcoded library versions that were older than existed in Fedora, so it didn't find the libraries it was looking for. The solution was to create a link to the new library as if it was an older library.
Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the right library
lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1 511360 1187380 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 ls -l /usr/lib64/libcurl.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 2 20:21 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so -> libcurl.so.4.4.0
I have checked this forum also but it's regarding Fedora 20, and the problem appeared to me with the new kernels (like >4.7 or so). I am not sure which library version I should try. Also, wouldn't it break other apps if I use it. I have also tried to delete all config and make a complete reinstall of the app - no luck.
сб, 5 нояб. 2016 г. в 0:26, stan stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 14:21:04 -0700 stan stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:03:00 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all! Had to reinstall Viber, and now it fails to connect when I enter my number. Logs show the following:
[snip]
I have crated a support case but they just said "we will try to reproduce... bla bla" and closed my case. Can anybody help maybe?
I did a quick search on viber and found this link of someone having problems running it. http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=298587 Their problem was that viber had hardcoded library versions that were older than existed in Fedora, so it didn't find the libraries it was looking for. The solution was to create a link to the new library as if it was an older library. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the right library
lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1 511360 1187380 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 ls -l /usr/lib64/libcurl.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 2 20:21 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so -> libcurl.so.4.4.0
I have checked this forum also but it's regarding Fedora 20, and the problem appeared to me with the new kernels (like >4.7 or so). I am not sure which library version I should try. Also, wouldn't it break other apps if I use it. I have also tried to delete all config and make a complete reinstall of the app - no luck.
I was just saying to do something like ln -s /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.3 But it seems that the plain .so links to so.4 already, and viber is using that. It might be checking the version internally, and not accepting so.4, however.
I think it is only coincidence that the kernel and this problem occurred around the same time. On my system, the new libcurl was installed on October 9. What happens if you boot an older kernel? You can get an rpm, or rpms, from koji, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 and install it / them using dnf -C install [koji kernel packages you have downloaded]
I think your best bet is to ask on the viber mailing list. They'll know immediately if the package they built accepts libcurl 4 or not.
On 11/08/2016 09:20 AM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the right library
lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1 511360 1187380 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 ls -l /usr/lib64/libcurl.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 2 20:21 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so -> libcurl.so.4.4.0
I have checked this forum also but it's regarding Fedora 20, and the problem appeared to me with the new kernels (like >4.7 or so). I am not sure which library version I should try. Also, wouldn't it break other apps if I use it. I have also tried to delete all config and make a complete reinstall of the app - no luck.
I was just saying to do something like ln -s /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.3 But it seems that the plain .so links to so.4 already, and viber is using that. It might be checking the version internally, and not accepting so.4, however.
I think it is only coincidence that the kernel and this problem occurred around the same time. On my system, the new libcurl was installed on October 9. What happens if you boot an older kernel? You can get an rpm, or rpms, from koji, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 and install it / them using dnf -C install [koji kernel packages you have downloaded]
I think your best bet is to ask on the viber mailing list. They'll know immediately if the package they built accepts libcurl 4 or not.
Uhm, my version of viber (version 4.2.2.6-2 on F24) doesn't use libcurl at all. Perhaps I didn't install it in the same manner as you, but an "ldd /opt/viber/Viber" doesn't reveal use of libcurl, nor does an "lsof -p PID-OF-VIBER | grep curl" reveal it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - When you don't know what to do, walk fast and look worried. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
On 11/08/2016 09:40 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 11/08/2016 09:20 AM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:02:13 +0000 Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for help anyway, I checked with lsof - seems it's using the right library
lsof -p 14263 | grep libcurl Viber 14263 ksy mem REG 253,1 511360 1187380 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 ls -l /usr/lib64/libcurl.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 2 20:21 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so -> libcurl.so.4.4.0
I have checked this forum also but it's regarding Fedora 20, and the problem appeared to me with the new kernels (like >4.7 or so). I am not sure which library version I should try. Also, wouldn't it break other apps if I use it. I have also tried to delete all config and make a complete reinstall of the app - no luck.
I was just saying to do something like ln -s /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.4.4.0 /usr/lib64/libcurl.so.3 But it seems that the plain .so links to so.4 already, and viber is using that. It might be checking the version internally, and not accepting so.4, however.
I think it is only coincidence that the kernel and this problem occurred around the same time. On my system, the new libcurl was installed on October 9. What happens if you boot an older kernel? You can get an rpm, or rpms, from koji, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 and install it / them using dnf -C install [koji kernel packages you have downloaded]
I think your best bet is to ask on the viber mailing list. They'll know immediately if the package they built accepts libcurl 4 or not.
Uhm, my version of viber (version 4.2.2.6-2 on F24) doesn't use libcurl at all. Perhaps I didn't install it in the same manner as you, but an "ldd /opt/viber/Viber" doesn't reveal use of libcurl, nor does an "lsof -p PID-OF-VIBER | grep curl" reveal it.
Ok, just updated Viber on my laptop to 6.0.1 and yes, it uses libcurl-- specifically:
# ldd /opt/viber/Viber | grep curl /opt/viber/Viber: /lib64/libcurl.so.4: no version information available (required by /opt/viber/Viber) libcurl.so.4 => /lib64/libcurl.so.4 (0x00007fed83d7c000)
My appologies for poking my nose in. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - "Do you suffer from long-term memory loss?" "I don't remember" - - -- Chumbawumba, "Amnesia" (TubThumping) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com wrote:
My appologies for poking my nose in.
Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point.
Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and maybe support gives some answer finally. The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated (crazy) for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall which has broken it completely.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com wrote:
My appologies for poking my nose in.
Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and maybe support gives some answer finally. The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated (crazy) for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall which has broken it completely.
I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38, 0.20 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used, 3802140 buff/cache KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used. 6646328 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE --------------------------------------
I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU on my desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.11 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used, 4922992 buff/cache KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used. 13697180 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE --------------------------------------
Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the background. YMMV.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>> wrote: > My appologies for poking my nose in. Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - su -; find / -name someone -exec touch {} ; - - - The UNIX way of touching someone - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading (i guess it's no supported already or so). I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then )
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com wrote:
On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and maybe support gives some answer finally. The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated (crazy) for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall which has broken it completely.
I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38, 0.20 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used, 3802140 buff/cache KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used. 6646328 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE --------------------------------------
I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU on my desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.11 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used, 4922992 buff/cache KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used. 13697180 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE --------------------------------------
Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the background. YMMV.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>wrote:
> My appologies for poking my nose in. Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point.
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
-su -; find / -name someone -exec touch \{\} \; -- The UNIX way of touching someone -
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading (i guess it's no supported already or so). I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then )
I installed Viber V6.0.1 on my laptop when I wrote my second message (in other words, today and the machine was already running the 4.8.4-200 kernel). The Viber V4.2.2.6-2 version was already installed on my desktop and was running the 4.7.9-200 kernel when I upgraded to the 4.8.4-200 kernel and rebooted the machine.
So, V6.0.1 was installed on an already running 4.8.4-200 kernel, V4.2.2.6-2 was installed on a 4.7.9-200 kernel which was subsequently upgraded to 4.8.4-200. Both run. I've done very little with Viber, but that's where it sits. I'm just offering this info as datapoints.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no > exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit > lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and > maybe support gives some answer finally. > The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and > has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated (crazy) > for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall which > has broken it completely. I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38, 0.20 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used, 3802140 buff/cache KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used. 6646328 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU on my desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.11 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used, 4922992 buff/cache KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used. 13697180 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the background. YMMV. > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>>> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 > Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>> wrote: > > > > My appologies for poking my nose in. > > Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - su -; find / -name someone -exec touch \{\} \; - - - The UNIX way of touching someone - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks, but your contacts and other settings were already present from an earlier version? Because for me it hangs on binding my number, like no internet connection.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 1:36 AM Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com wrote:
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading (i guess it's no supported already or so). I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then )
I installed Viber V6.0.1 on my laptop when I wrote my second message (in other words, today and the machine was already running the 4.8.4-200 kernel). The Viber V4.2.2.6-2 version was already installed on my desktop and was running the 4.7.9-200 kernel when I upgraded to the 4.8.4-200 kernel and rebooted the machine.
So, V6.0.1 was installed on an already running 4.8.4-200 kernel, V4.2.2.6-2 was installed on a 4.7.9-200 kernel which was subsequently upgraded to 4.8.4-200. Both run. I've done very little with Viber, but that's where it sits. I'm just offering this info as datapoints.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but there's no > exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm abit
> lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and > maybe support gives some answer finally. > The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpuand
> has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated (crazy) > for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall which > has broken it completely. I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38, 0.20 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1si,
0.0 st KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used, 3802140 buff/cache KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used. 6646328 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU on my desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.11 Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0si,
0.0 st KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used, 4922992 buff/cache KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used. 13697180 avail Mem PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 Viber -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the background. YMMV. > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>>> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 > Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>> wrote: > > > > My appologies for poking my nose in. > > Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data point.
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2
-
- su -; find / -name someone -exec touch \{\} \;
- - The UNIX way of touching someone
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
-I doubt, therefore I might be. -
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/08/2016 10:28 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
Thanks, but your contacts and other settings were already present from an earlier version? Because for me it hangs on binding my number, like no internet connection.
On the laptop (new install of 6.0.1), once I did the qrscan from my phone the contacts showed up fine. On the desktop (original install of 4.2.2.6-2), the contacts also show up.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 1:36 AM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I > noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network (maybe > I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i > thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work > systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. > Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading > (i guess it's no supported already or so). > I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then ) I installed Viber V6.0.1 on my laptop when I wrote my second message (in other words, today and the machine was already running the 4.8.4-200 kernel). The Viber V4.2.2.6-2 version was already installed on my desktop and was running the 4.7.9-200 kernel when I upgraded to the 4.8.4-200 kernel and rebooted the machine. So, V6.0.1 was installed on an already running 4.8.4-200 kernel, V4.2.2.6-2 was installed on a 4.7.9-200 kernel which was subsequently upgraded to 4.8.4-200. Both run. I've done very little with Viber, but that's where it sits. I'm just offering this info as datapoints. > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>> wrote: > > On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > > Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but > there's no > > exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit > > lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and > > maybe support gives some answer finally. > > The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and > > has problems sending links and images with vpn adapter activated > (crazy) > > for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall > which > > has broken it completely. > > I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel > 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 > top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38, 0.20 > Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used, 3802140 > buff/cache > KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used. 6646328 > avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU on my > desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 > top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13, 0.11 > Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used, 4922992 > buff/cache > KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used. 13697180 > avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the > background. YMMV. > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>> > > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>>>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 > > Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>> <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > My appologies for poking my nose in. > > > > Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data > point. >
---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - Money won't buy happiness, but it will pay the salary of a large - - research staff to study the problem. - Bill Vaughan - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
So I have fixed it finally but it was a crazy way to go. I copied my .ViberPC directory from home laptop to work, then I had to install Viber 4 and connect my account (it was possible when the settings are already present), then I installed Viber 6, scanned qr code and it seems to work. Still seems I do not have avatars but doesn't matter in fact. And lol - it still consumes 300% CPU. At least it sends and receives messages.
ср, 9 нояб. 2016 г. в 20:29, Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com:
On 11/08/2016 10:28 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
Thanks, but your contacts and other settings were already present from an earlier version? Because for me it hangs on binding my number, like no internet connection.
On the laptop (new install of 6.0.1), once I did the qrscan from my phone the contacts showed up fine. On the desktop (original install of 4.2.2.6-2), the contacts also show up.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 1:36 AM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I > noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network(maybe
> I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i > thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work > systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. > Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading > (i guess it's no supported already or so). > I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then)
I installed Viber V6.0.1 on my laptop when I wrote my second message (in other words, today and the machine was already running the 4.8.4-200 kernel). The Viber V4.2.2.6-2 version was already installed on my desktop and was running the 4.7.9-200 kernel when I upgraded to the 4.8.4-200 kernel and rebooted the machine. So, V6.0.1 was installed on an already running 4.8.4-200 kernel, V4.2.2.6-2 was installed on a 4.7.9-200 kernel which was subsequently upgraded to 4.8.4-200. Both run. I've done very little with Viber,but
that's where it sits. I'm just offering this info as datapoints. > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>>wrote:
> > On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > > Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but > there's no > > exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit > > lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and > > maybe support gives some answer finally. > > The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and > > has problems sending links and images with vpn adapteractivated
> (crazy) > > for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall > which > > has broken it completely. > > I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel > 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 > top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38,0.20
> Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used,3802140
> buff/cache > KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used.6646328
> avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU onmy
> desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 > top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13,0.11
> Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used,4922992
> buff/cache > KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used.13697180
> avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the > background. YMMV. > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>> > > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>>>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 > > Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>> <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > My appologies for poking my nose in. > > > > Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data > point. >
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
-- Money won't buy happiness, but it will pay the salary of a large -
research staff to study the problem. - Bill Vaughan -
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all! The truth revealed. It seems that there was some conflict with compat-openssl which goes with spotify-client ( http://negativo17.org/spotify-client/). At least after this package removal viber started to work as usual. After spotify-client reinstall I could reproduce the issue. I have left a comment at spotify repo page. That's somehow weird however. Maybe this info helps somebody :)
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, 10:51 AM Kseniya Blashchuk ksyblast@gmail.com wrote:
So I have fixed it finally but it was a crazy way to go. I copied my .ViberPC directory from home laptop to work, then I had to install Viber 4 and connect my account (it was possible when the settings are already present), then I installed Viber 6, scanned qr code and it seems to work. Still seems I do not have avatars but doesn't matter in fact. And lol - it still consumes 300% CPU. At least it sends and receives messages.
ср, 9 нояб. 2016 г. в 20:29, Rick Stevens ricks@alldigital.com:
On 11/08/2016 10:28 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
Thanks, but your contacts and other settings were already present from an earlier version? Because for me it hangs on binding my number, like no internet connection.
On the laptop (new install of 6.0.1), once I did the qrscan from my phone the contacts showed up fine. On the desktop (original install of 4.2.2.6-2), the contacts also show up.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 1:36 AM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> wrote:
On 11/08/2016 01:11 PM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > On my home laptop it's also okay (but i haven't tried reinstall), I > noticed that it started on my work laptop on ipv6 only network(maybe
> I'm too suspicious and the reason is different?) so at that time i > thought a complete reinstall can fix that ). But my home and work > systems are almost the same, I'll check deeper tomorrow if i have time. > Viber version 4 starts normally to me but fails then on contacts loading > (i guess it's no supported already or so). > I'm thinking to copy my home config file and see what happens then)
I installed Viber V6.0.1 on my laptop when I wrote my second message (in other words, today and the machine was already running the 4.8.4-200 kernel). The Viber V4.2.2.6-2 version was already installed on my desktop and was running the 4.7.9-200 kernel when I upgraded to the 4.8.4-200 kernel and rebooted the machine. So, V6.0.1 was installed on an already running 4.8.4-200 kernel, V4.2.2.6-2 was installed on a 4.7.9-200 kernel which was subsequently upgraded to 4.8.4-200. Both run. I've done very little with Viber,but
that's where it sits. I'm just offering this info as datapoints. > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 10:10 PM Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>>wrote:
> > On 11/08/2016 10:46 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > > Yes thanks guys, I have already written to Viber support but > there's no > > exact answer yet and seems they don't have a mailing list. I'm a bit > > lazy to try an older kernel :D, I still have some more ideas )) and > > maybe support gives some answer finally. > > The funniest thing is that it was working before but used 300% cpu and > > has problems sending links and images with vpn adapteractivated
> (crazy) > > for some reason, that's why i decided to make a complete reinstall > which > > has broken it completely. > > I'm looking at my laptop running the 6.0.1 version on kernel > 4.8.4-200.fc24.x86_64 and I don't see it using tons of CPU: > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@golem4 ~]# top -p 17431 -b -n 1 > top - 11:02:35 up 23:40, 1 user, load average: 0.70, 0.38,0.20
> Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.8 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.1 id, 0.6 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.1 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 8086864 total, 3297212 free, 987512 used,3802140
> buff/cache > KiB Swap: 10190844 total, 10190844 free, 0 used.6646328
> avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 17431 rick 20 0 3449792 249252 113836 S 0.0 3.1 0:22.65 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > I also don't see the older 4.2.2.6-2 version sucking up CPU onmy
> desktop (running the same kernel version as the laptop): > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > [root@prophead ~]# top -p 25342 -b -n 1 > top - 11:03:38 up 22:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.13,0.11
> Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > %Cpu(s): 1.2 us, 0.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 97.8 id, 0.3 wa, 0.2 hi, 0.0 si, > 0.0 st > KiB Mem : 16290344 total, 9494432 free, 1872920 used,4922992
> buff/cache > KiB Swap: 39047164 total, 39047164 free, 0 used.13697180
> avail Mem > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 25342 rick 20 0 5550212 173384 86516 S 0.0 1.1 0:04.34 > Viber > -------------------- CUT HERE -------------------------------------- > > Granted, I'm not doing anything with Viber. It's just running in the > background. YMMV. > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:14 PM stan <stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>> > > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net> > <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net <mailto:stanl-fedorauser@vfemail.net>>>> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:53:51 -0800 > > Rick Stevens <ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>> <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com> > <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com <mailto:ricks@alldigital.com>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > My appologies for poking my nose in. > > > > Not the OP, but I think it's great that you added another data > point. >
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 -
-- Money won't buy happiness, but it will pay the salary of a large -
research staff to study the problem. - Bill Vaughan -
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Kseniya Blashchuk -
Rick Stevens -
stan