Hello,
After I upgrade a fedora 20 to fedora 22, I run (by mistake) yum update. It is now running for more than 5 hours (on a machine 10 year old with 3G of RAM and plenty of space on the disk). It looks like that it is stock on Processing Dependency: xz-libs (x82-32)
I do not see anything else wrong!
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
Thank.
=========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ===========================================================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" pocallaghan@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:11:31 AM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 00:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
On F22 yum *is* dnf (which you would know if you read the message it prints when it starts), so something else is wrong.
poc
Well, DNF does not print these messages AFAIK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Radek Holy" rholy@redhat.com To: "Community support for Fedora users" users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:26:46 PM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" pocallaghan@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:11:31 AM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 00:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
On F22 yum *is* dnf (which you would know if you read the message it prints when it starts), so something else is wrong.
poc
Well, DNF does not print these messages AFAIK.
Radek Holý Associate Software Engineer Software Management Team Red Hat Czech
...I mean that "Processing Dependency: xz-libs (x82-32)".
On 07/27/15 22:26, Radek Holy wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" pocallaghan@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:11:31 AM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 00:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
On F22 yum *is* dnf (which you would know if you read the message it prints when it starts), so something else is wrong.
poc
Well, DNF does not print these messages AFAIK.
I don't think poc was saying "dnf" prints the messages. Just that a message is printed when you use yum which indicates it has been depreciated. e.g.
Konsole output [egreshko@meimei ~]$ yum check-update Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf check-update'. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. To transfer transaction metadata from yum to DNF, run: 'dnf install python-dnf-plugins-extras-migrate && dnf-2 migrate'
langpacks: No languages are enabled Adding en_US to language list Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Mon Jul 27 22:39:39 2015.
FWIW, /bin/yum is actually a shell script in F22.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Greshko" ed.greshko@greshko.com To: "Community support for Fedora users" users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:42:57 PM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On 07/27/15 22:26, Radek Holy wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" pocallaghan@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:11:31 AM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 00:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
On F22 yum *is* dnf (which you would know if you read the message it prints when it starts), so something else is wrong.
poc
Well, DNF does not print these messages AFAIK.
I don't think poc was saying "dnf" prints the messages. Just that a message is printed when you use yum which indicates it has been depreciated. e.g.
Konsole output [egreshko@meimei ~]$ yum check-update Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf check-update'. See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' for more information. To transfer transaction metadata from yum to DNF, run: 'dnf install python-dnf-plugins-extras-migrate && dnf-2 migrate'
langpacks: No languages are enabled Adding en_US to language list Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Mon Jul 27 22:39:39 2015.
FWIW, /bin/yum is actually a shell script in F22.
-- If I wanted a blog or social media I'd go elsewhere
Right, sorry for not being clear. I didn't notice that the original message was shortened by poc while I still remembered the context. I corrected myself later, see: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/463473.html
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 10:26 -0400, Radek Holy wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" pocallaghan@gmail.com To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 1:11:31 AM Subject: Re: Upgrade to fedora 22
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 00:53 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
On F22 yum *is* dnf (which you would know if you read the message it prints when it starts), so something else is wrong.
poc
Well, DNF does not print these messages AFAIK.
Do you get the message when you try to run yum on F22? If you don't, there is something wrong with your installation. Try this:
rpm -qf `which yum`
It should say something like:
dnf-yum-1.0.1-2.fc22.noarch
poc
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:53:30 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After I upgrade a fedora 20 to fedora 22, I run (by mistake) yum update. It is now running for more than 5 hours (on a machine 10 year old with 3G of RAM and plenty of space on the disk). It looks like that it is stock on Processing Dependency: xz-libs (x82-32)
I do not see anything else wrong!
Should I be more patient, or should I kill the process and run dnf?
Do you mean to indicate that you find it normal to wait 5 hours or more for the dependency resolving loop? Have you ever had to wait so long before?
No, that would not be normal.
Else, the architecture is x86-32 not x82-32, and the last few lines of output would be relevant. One can safely interrupt these package tools before the final transaction. Processing of dependencies (provided that you don't just call it like that) is only "looking at things" and not updating your installed package yet. Next would be the downloading of packages, then the transaction check, and only afterwards your installation would be touched.
-
Ed Greshko -
Michael Schwendt -
Patrick Dupre -
Patrick O'Callaghan -
Radek Holy