On F33, yum update gives me ... (195/196): vim-common-8.2.2787-1.fc33.x86_64.rp 3.6 MB/s | 6.7 MB 00:01 (196/196): java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.11.0.9 2.4 MB/s | 38 MB 00:15 [DRPM] libburn-1.5.4-1.fc33_1.5.4-2.fc33.x86_64.drpm: done -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 8.5 MB/s | 258 MB 00:30 Delta RPMs reduced 511.0 MB of updates to 510.8 MB (0.1% saved) warning: /var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-nonfree-237dcb74312e3130/packages/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-33-2.fc33.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 94843c65: NOKEY RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree 1.6 MB/s | 1.7 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x94843C65: Userid : "RPM Fusion nonfree repository for Fedora (2020) rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org" Fingerprint: 79BD B88F 9BBF 7391 0FD4 095B 6A2A F961 9484 3C65 From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-33 Is this ok [y/N]:
From google, I know approximately what it means. Also from google: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPM Fusion nonfree repository
The message seems to be aganst the repository rather than an individual package. Huh? Why would an update reach out to a previously unused repository? For that matter I'm not all that sure it did. I'm pretty sure I've used rpmfusion nonfreee before. Why would it be balking now? What do I do about it?
This problem predates the root change mentioned in another thread (... won't boot after moving ...). I'd suspected, clearly incorrectly, that it had something to do with the fullness of my root partition.
Until I have a solution, is there a way to tell yum to update everything that does not involve rpmfusion non-free?
On 26/04/2021 02:09, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On F33, yum update gives me ... (195/196): vim-common-8.2.2787-1.fc33.x86_64.rp 3.6 MB/s | 6.7 MB 00:01 (196/196): java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.11.0.9 2.4 MB/s | 38 MB 00:15 [DRPM] libburn-1.5.4-1.fc33_1.5.4-2.fc33.x86_64.drpm: done
Total 8.5 MB/s | 258 MB 00:30 Delta RPMs reduced 511.0 MB of updates to 510.8 MB (0.1% saved) warning: /var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-nonfree-237dcb74312e3130/packages/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-33-2.fc33.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 94843c65: NOKEY RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree 1.6 MB/s | 1.7 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x94843C65: Userid : "RPM Fusion nonfree repository for Fedora (2020) rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org" Fingerprint: 79BD B88F 9BBF 7391 0FD4 095B 6A2A F961 9484 3C65 From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-33 Is this ok [y/N]:
From google, I know approximately what it means. Also from google: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPM Fusion nonfree repository
The message seems to be aganst the repository rather than an individual package. Huh? Why would an update reach out to a previously unused repository? For that matter I'm not all that sure it did. I'm pretty sure I've used rpmfusion nonfreee before. Why would it be balking now? What do I do about it?
This problem predates the root change mentioned in another thread (... won't boot after moving ...). I'd suspected, clearly incorrectly, that it had something to do with the fullness of my root partition.
Until I have a solution, is there a way to tell yum to update everything that does not involve rpmfusion non-free?
Well, for sure you have rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data installed on your system. And, in the update process it is found that the signing key needs and update as well.
You can see what rpmfusion packages are installed by doing
dnf list installed | grep rpmfusion
And you can find out when rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data was installed by using
dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data
And when you find the transaction number you can do
dnf history info X
where X is the transaction number.
The "yum" command has been depreciated for some time now. dnf the preferred command to use for command line updates.
I don't know why you'd see this request to update the key as a "problem".
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 26/04/2021 02:09, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On F33, yum update gives me ... (195/196): vim-common-8.2.2787-1.fc33.x86_64.rp 3.6 MB/s | 6.7 MB 00:01 (196/196): java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.11.0.9 2.4 MB/s | 38 MB 00:15 [DRPM] libburn-1.5.4-1.fc33_1.5.4-2.fc33.x86_64.drpm: done
Total 8.5 MB/s | 258 MB 00:30 Delta RPMs reduced 511.0 MB of updates to 510.8 MB (0.1% saved) warning: /var/cache/dnf/rpmfusion-nonfree-237dcb74312e3130/packages/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-33-2.fc33.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 94843c65: NOKEY RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree 1.6 MB/s | 1.7 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x94843C65: Userid : "RPM Fusion nonfree repository for Fedora (2020) rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org" Fingerprint: 79BD B88F 9BBF 7391 0FD4 095B 6A2A F961 9484 3C65 From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-33 Is this ok [y/N]:
Well, for sure you have rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data installed on your system. And, in the update process it is found that the signing key needs and update as well.
As a guess, I tried yum update --exclude '*fusion*' It ran and did updates. Following that with a yum update gave me a nothing to do.
You can see what rpmfusion packages are installed by doing
dnf list installed | grep rpmfusion
root@localhost entries]# dnf list installed | grep nonfree rpmfusion-nonfree-release.noarch 33-1 @@commandline [root@localhost entries]#
And you can find out when rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data was installed by using
dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data
[root@localhost entries]# dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data No transaction which manipulates package 'rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data' was found. [root@localhost entries]#
Wow.
And when you find the transaction number you can do
dnf history info X
where X is the transaction number.
The "yum" command has been depreciated for some time now. dnf the preferred command to use for command line updates.
I don't know why you'd see this request to update the key as a "problem".
I took it as a request to continue without a valid key.
root@localhost entries]# dnf update rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data Last metadata expiration check: 2:30:57 ago on Sun 25 Apr 2021 12:00:55 PM CDT. Package rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data available, but not installed. No match for argument: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data Error: No packages marked for upgrade. [root@localhost entries]# dnf update '*rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data*' Last metadata expiration check: 2:31:42 ago on Sun 25 Apr 2021 12:00:55 PM CDT. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! [root@localhost entries]#
On 4/25/21 12:34 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Ed Greshko wrote:
I don't know why you'd see this request to update the key as a "problem".
I took it as a request to continue without a valid key.
Importing GPG key 0x94843C65: Userid : "RPM Fusion nonfree repository for Fedora (2020) rpmfusion-buildsys@lists.rpmfusion.org" Fingerprint: 79BD B88F 9BBF 7391 0FD4 095B 6A2A F961 9484 3C65 From : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-33 Is this ok [y/N]:
It's asking you if it's ok to import the rpmfusion key.
On 26/04/2021 03:34, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well, for sure you have rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data installed on your system. And, in the update process it is found that the signing key needs and update as well.
As a guess, I tried yum update --exclude '*fusion*' It ran and did updates. Following that with a yum update gave me a nothing to do.
Of course. You would have gotten the same "nothing to do" if you had run dnf --disablerepo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates update
You can see what rpmfusion packages are installed by doing
dnf list installed | grep rpmfusion
root@localhost entries]# dnf list installed | grep nonfree rpmfusion-nonfree-release.noarch 33-1 @@commandline [root@localhost entries]#
Well I don't know how/if the output would have been different if dnf had been used to install. But I would have expected something like.
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch 34-1.fc34 @rpmfusion-nonfree
Indicating that the install was via the repo. What I see above suggests it was installed after downloading an rpm.
LIke this one I had done after download a utility....
usbcaptureutility.x86_64 3.0.3.4202-1.el7.centos @@commandline
But, I had installed the rpm using dnf. So, it does show up as a transaction.
1069 | install ./usbcaptureutility | 2019-12-13 15:13 | Install | 1
And you can find out when rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data was installed by using
dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data
[root@localhost entries]# dnf history rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data No transaction which manipulates package 'rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data' was found. [root@localhost entries]#
Wow.
This suggests to me that maybe "rpm" was used directly to install.
And when you find the transaction number you can do
dnf history info X
where X is the transaction number.
The "yum" command has been depreciated for some time now. dnf the preferred command to use for command line updates.
I don't know why you'd see this request to update the key as a "problem".
I took it as a request to continue without a valid key.
No... It did say "Importing GPG key..." And you are being asked if that is OK.
You could always try....
dnf erase rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data
and see if a package needs it.
-
Ed Greshko -
Michael Hennebry -
Samuel Sieb