I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:17:15 -0700, reg wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. But you need to consider your specific requirements (if any).
For GNOME desktop usage, F12 is less stable here. There seem to be problems in nautilus/gnome-panel/dbus, for example, as sometimes there are crashes which make the desktop icons disappear. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/nautilus is flooded with ABRT generated tickets, which is evidence of how many people are affected by such issues.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. Everything use to work there. In F12, my sound is not working and sometimes my Laptop's keyboard stop working, until I reboot. This is really annoying.
Thanks, Anoop
-- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
@ Anoop Does your mouse also stop to work. As in my case the keyboard and mouse both stop to work and i have to restart the machine. Faced the same issue with live CD of karmic too so was considering this to be a hardware issue.
Thanks Saurabh
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Anoop anoop.chargotra@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. Everything use to work there. In F12, my sound is not working and sometimes my Laptop's keyboard stop working, until I reboot. This is really annoying.
Thanks, Anoop
-- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Friday 29 January 2010 11:31:44 Saurabh Sharma wrote:
@ Anoop Does your mouse also stop to work. As in my case the keyboard and mouse both stop to work and i have to restart the machine. Faced the same issue with live CD of karmic too so was considering this to be a hardware issue.
Thanks Saurabh
I've had the same problem but was blaming it on my KVM switch ;-)
Tony
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Anoop anoop.chargotra@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. Everything use to work there. In F12, my sound is not working and sometimes my Laptop's keyboard stop working, until I reboot. This is really annoying.
Thanks, Anoop
-- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Saurabh Sharma luckysharma11@gmail.com wrote:
@ Anoop Does your mouse also stop to work. As in my case the keyboard and mouse both stop to work and i have to restart the machine. Faced the same issue with live CD of karmic too so was considering this to be a hardware issue.
No Saurabh, Its just the keyboard, everything else is fine. I do a reboot gracefully using my mouse :)
Thanks, Anoop
Thanks Saurabh
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Anoop anoop.chargotra@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. Everything use to work there. In F12, my sound is not working and sometimes my Laptop's keyboard stop working, until I reboot. This is really annoying.
Thanks, Anoop
-- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Anoop anoop.chargotra@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Saurabh Sharma luckysharma11@gmail.com wrote:
@ Anoop Does your mouse also stop to work. As in my case the keyboard and mouse both stop to work and i have to restart the machine. Faced the same issue with live CD of karmic too so was considering this to be a hardware issue.
No Saurabh, Its just the keyboard, everything else is fine. I do a reboot gracefully using my mouse :)
The behaviour which you are talking is seen on my Desktop running F12. Recently some update broke its resolutions also.
Thanks, Anoop
Thanks Saurabh
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Anoop anoop.chargotra@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:47 PM, reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
F11. Everything use to work there. In F12, my sound is not working and sometimes my Laptop's keyboard stop working, until I reboot. This is really annoying.
Thanks, Anoop
-- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
--- On Fri, 1/29/10, reg@dwf.com reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
Stay with F11 for now as long as it does everything you need it to do without problems. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" has always been my philosophy.
B
Am Freitag, den 29.01.2010, 01:17 -0700 schrieb reg@dwf.com:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
It depends on your definition of "stable": If you define stable as "everything works", then I'd say go for F12. F12 is one of the best releases we ever had, it was already rock solid when it was still the beta or release candidate. But when you define stable as feature complete, no API changes and only a few updates, then it's F11. There is still a lot of updates coming for F12 while F11 has calmed down.
Regards, Christoph
Stay with F11 for now as long as it does everything you need it to do without problems. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" has always been my philosophy.
I entirely agree with this, there are still too many problems with Fedora 12. As someone (Craig, I think) pointed out to me a while ago, new releases are test beds not intended for production.
The question remains: Do you just want to experiment and incur the problems that require expertise to fix, or do you want to use the os to drive applications which achieve results, if the latter then stick with Fedora 11.
Roger
The question remains: Do you just want to experiment and incur the problems that require expertise to fix, or do you want to use the os to drive applications which achieve results, if the latter then stick with Fedora 11.
12 is visually much nicer, and has some good improvements - but I think that's good advice. The FC12 virtualisation still crashes (in bugzilla getting debugged) and there are some other rough edges.
F12 fixes all the problems on a ACER notebook that I have including keyboard that I had problems on F10 (US International with ABNT2 layout).
But on a notebook with SiS chipsets (671/771) I still using F11 because the xorg version on F12 has break some graphic drivers that depends on the old xorg architecture (maybe the major problems are with shared vga static variables defined on xf86resources.h that was removed). I got the SiS driver from Debian and build for F11 and need to compile the latest stable kernel to put ACPI (hibernate and suspend capabilities) correctly.
I still using F11 on a machine with NVidia graphic cards but I will try to upgrade. F11 fixes many problems found on F8 on that machine including the video resolution. On machines with Intel graphic cards F12 is great.
Gnome 2.28 is great. Many Nautilus bugs are fixed on display of directories in tree mode. I think that Gnome cut some old great resources to reorganize them and put each one again in a consistent and simpler mode in the correct time.
F12 has some problems on v4l that F11 does not have. On F12 sometimes is necessary to download manually and build the latest v4l-dvb for some webcams to work correctly, I think the problem is on libv4l.
I think that F12 can be better if upgrade the kernel to the latest release to use the new ACPI functionalities, running on a greater number of portable computers and having a functional hibernate and suspend capabilities, and without the need to disable ACPI on installer (that on F12 is better but the 2.6.32 or later kernels is great). Some variables was changed with this new kernel, but this was already ignored with xorg package.
Read the release notes to check if your architecture was marked as obsolete on F12 or not.
Regards.
On 01/30/2010 10:14 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
The question remains: Do you just want to experiment and incur the problems that require expertise to fix, or do you want to use the os to drive applications which achieve results, if the latter then stick with Fedora 11.
12 is visually much nicer, and has some good improvements - but I think that's good advice. The FC12 virtualisation still crashes (in bugzilla getting debugged) and there are some other rough edges.
Agreed. Give it time and it will be a winner, but then Fedora 13 or 14 will be up and running. This is why I look into upgrading a production os every 2nd or 3rd version and just play around with the latest version getting the hang of it's new attributes and capabilities. R
reg@dwf.com wrote:
I have a half dozen machines updated to F11, and one to F12. Im wondering if I should update the F11s to F12 or leave well enough alone.
I realize that the F11 distribution has reached a 'stable' status, and the F12 distribution will probably take a couple more months to reach that status, but would be interested in hearing what other users have to say about the pair.
A belated comment, F12 is worse than I thought it was. I have put it on six machines, reinstalled F11 on three, run two using the vesa video, and one works for the moment, although I have regular backups of it, and a set of F11 install and upgrade material stored in the same room.
Unless there is some major reason for F12, skip it, all the problems I have had were with display, keyboard, touchpad, or GNOME bits. Just one frustrating user interface thing after another. As a server it works fine, boot into runlevel three, run all my X apps from a remote display and it works fine. The only laptop which is useful run 2.6.33-rc5 plus a few patches, which I built myself. Not the optimal way to go.
Good luck with whatever you install.
To fix one of my problems, I found a driver for SiS 671/771 graphic card to X.org greater than 7.3 at here:
- http://estebanordano.com.ar/sis-m671m672-driver-for-xorg-xserver-7-5-on-debi...
Compiled and work on F12. It needs a fix on make 'man', fix or comment it on Makefile.
But only 2D resources is working, no 3D, so no compiz, but the resolution and performance is good.
The updates on F12 fixed the v4l problems on a Sonix webcam and on Digital TV receivers, only needed to add the firmware files on /lib/firmware.
There is a RPM for Mandriva that contains some firmware files at here:
- http://rpmlinux.org/dvb-firmware-pack
A howto for Digital TV configuration:
- http://dougsland.livejournal.com/103169.html
Need to configure the channels from the frequency table to each country. On Brazil is like this:
- http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/ISDB-T_Frequency_Table
Install 'dvb-apps' and pass the file that contains the frequency table to 'scandvb' application and redirect the output to a file, this output is the channels frequencies that VLC player understand.
No need anymore to manually install the v4l-dvb from git. The RPM from F12 works great.
The ACPI only works on the kernel 2.6.32-git* series on a ASUStek board, not on older and newer with the same configuration. On newer kernels I need to disable local APIC on boot with 'nolapic', so loose hibernation and brightness control, I am sniffing the cause. But for a while I am using 2.6.32-git14 and it works great.
I compiled and installed a Ethernet driver for Realtek 8111/8168B from the Realtek homepage and blacklist the default driver module, only need to add some 'include' definitions on the source that was changed on newer kernels.
I only need to configure some soft-modems now based on ALSA ;)
Thank you. Regards.
Linux rules.
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Allann Jones allanjos@gmail.com wrote:
F12 fixes all the problems on a ACER notebook that I have including keyboard that I had problems on F10 (US International with ABNT2 layout).
But on a notebook with SiS chipsets (671/771) I still using F11 because the xorg version on F12 has break some graphic drivers that depends on the old xorg architecture (maybe the major problems are with shared vga static variables defined on xf86resources.h that was removed). I got the SiS driver from Debian and build for F11 and need to compile the latest stable kernel to put ACPI (hibernate and suspend capabilities) correctly.
I still using F11 on a machine with NVidia graphic cards but I will try to upgrade. F11 fixes many problems found on F8 on that machine including the video resolution. On machines with Intel graphic cards F12 is great.
Gnome 2.28 is great. Many Nautilus bugs are fixed on display of directories in tree mode. I think that Gnome cut some old great resources to reorganize them and put each one again in a consistent and simpler mode in the correct time.
F12 has some problems on v4l that F11 does not have. On F12 sometimes is necessary to download manually and build the latest v4l-dvb for some webcams to work correctly, I think the problem is on libv4l.
I think that F12 can be better if upgrade the kernel to the latest release to use the new ACPI functionalities, running on a greater number of portable computers and having a functional hibernate and suspend capabilities, and without the need to disable ACPI on installer (that on F12 is better but the 2.6.32 or later kernels is great). Some variables was changed with this new kernel, but this was already ignored with xorg package.
Read the release notes to check if your architecture was marked as obsolete on F12 or not.