log entry

[Tim]

**Unmatched Entries**
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory

I googled this and found people with the same problem and the only
response was are you booting with rhgb.  But no one ever answered the
question, or what rhgb dose.  If it's a service can I just remove it?

Thanks, Tim...

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Mi, den 29.09.2004 schrieb Timothy Payne um 14:58:

>  **Unmatched Entries**
>  open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory 
>  I googled this and found people with the same problem and the only
>  response was are you booting with rhgb.  But no one ever answered the
>  question, or what rhgb dose.  If it's a service can I just remove it?
>  
>  Thanks, Tim... 
See Bill's comment on the same question about the log entries:

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-September/msg02431.html

RHGB is Red Hat graphical boot - it is by default set in /etc/grub.conf
in the kernel line by "rhgb". It is the graphical boot using
framebuffer.

From my point of view: just ignore the log entries and logwatch
warnings.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp 
Serendipity 16:11:52 up 8 days, 18:15, load average: 1.81, 1.08, 0.88

[Tim]

On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:14, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>  Am Mi, den 29.09.2004 schrieb Timothy Payne um 14:58:
>  
>  > **Unmatched Entries**
>  > open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
>  
>  > I googled this and found people with the same problem and the only
>  > response was are you booting with rhgb.  But no one ever answered the
>  > question, or what rhgb dose.  If it's a service can I just remove it?
>  > 
>  > Thanks, Tim...
>  
>  See Bill's comment on the same question about the log entries:
>  
>  http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-September/msg02431.html
>  
>  RHGB is Red Hat graphical boot - it is by default set in /etc/grub.conf
>  in the kernel line by "rhgb". It is the graphical boot using
>  framebuffer.
>  
>  From my point of view: just ignore the log entries and logwatch
>  warnings.
>  
>  Alexander 
Funny that's the same thing I did with my wife and she kicked me out of
the house.  Thanks Tim...

[Craig White]

On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 21:42, Timothy Payne wrote:
>  > 
>  > From my point of view: just ignore the log entries and logwatch
>  > warnings.
>  > 
>  > Alexander
>  
>  Funny that's the same thing I did with my wife and she kicked me out of
>  the house.  Thanks Tim... 
----
not everyone is that lucky...you should have bought a lottery ticket at
the same time.

Craig

[Tim]

The link suggested:
change_console -r
But I got:
bash: change_console: command not found

I guess I'll just ignore it like I did with my wife, now I'm allot
happier, so I guess the same thing will happen.


On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 21:42, Timothy Payne wrote:
>  On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 07:14, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>  > Am Mi, den 29.09.2004 schrieb Timothy Payne um 14:58:
>  > 
>  > > **Unmatched Entries**
>  > > open(/dev/pts/0): No such file or directory
>  > 
>  > > I googled this and found people with the same problem and the only
>  > > response was are you booting with rhgb.  But no one ever answered the
>  > > question, or what rhgb dose.  If it's a service can I just remove it?
>  > > 
>  > > Thanks, Tim...
>  > 
>  > See Bill's comment on the same question about the log entries:
>  > 
>  > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-September/msg02431.html
>  > 
>  > RHGB is Red Hat graphical boot - it is by default set in /etc/grub.conf
>  > in the kernel line by "rhgb". It is the graphical boot using
>  > framebuffer.
>  > 
>  > From my point of view: just ignore the log entries and logwatch
>  > warnings.
>  > 
>  > Alexander
>  
>  Funny that's the same thing I did with my wife and she kicked me out of
>  the house.  Thanks Tim...

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Fr, den 01.10.2004 schrieb Timothy Payne um 7:12:

>  The link suggested:
>  change_console -r
>  But I got:
>  bash: change_console: command not found
>  
>  I guess I'll just ignore it like I did with my wife, now I'm allot
>  happier, so I guess the same thing will happen. 
No, you just learn what was explained a hundred times here on the list,
that there is a difference between "su" and "su -". And with former
version you do not get a full root shell environment, thus lacking /sbin
in the $PATH.

$ which change_console
/sbin/change_console

$ rpm -qf $(which change_console)
SysVinit-2.85-25

Very simple. See "man su".

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp 
Serendipity 17:16:49 up 1 day, 19:43, load average: 0.85, 0.77, 0.72

[Tim]

Thank you for your rude and informative reply

Tim...

On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 08:19, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>  Am Fr, den 01.10.2004 schrieb Timothy Payne um 7:12:
>  
>  > The link suggested:
>  > change_console -r
>  > But I got:
>  > bash: change_console: command not found
>  > 
>  > I guess I'll just ignore it like I did with my wife, now I'm allot
>  > happier, so I guess the same thing will happen.
>  
>  No, you just learn what was explained a hundred times here on the list,
>  that there is a difference between "su" and "su -". And with former
>  version you do not get a full root shell environment, thus lacking /sbin
>  in the $PATH.
>  
>  $ which change_console
>  /sbin/change_console
>  
>  $ rpm -qf $(which change_console)
>  SysVinit-2.85-25
>  
>  Very simple. See "man su".
>  
>  Alexander
>