Dan Kenigsberg has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Bond destroying ......................................................................
Patch Set 1: I would prefer that you didn't submit this
(2 inline comments)
Yeela, do you have a clue by any chance?
.................................................... Commit Message Line 7: Bond destroying Line 8: Line 9: If there is deleted network with bond other than bond[0-4] and no Line 10: other network is using that bond, the bond is destroyed. It prevents Line 11: accumulation poorly named bonds. "poorly named" bonds are not the problem.
The issue that we must keep bond0-4 for backward compatibility. But we do not want to accumulate any other bond.
Please fix the commit message to show that. Line 12: Line 13: Change-Id: I0cd27f1ff9a62e202c3513e54df5481d1b72ed7c Line 14: Bug-Url: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/928442
.................................................... File vdsm/configNetwork.py Line 517: self._backup(netinfo.NET_CONF_PREF + bonding) Line 518: self._removeFile(netinfo.NET_CONF_PREF + bonding) Line 519: if bonding not in ['bond0', 'bond1', 'bond2', 'bond3', 'bond4']: Line 520: with open(BONDING_MASTERS, 'w') as f: Line 521: f.write("-%s\n" % bonding) wouldn't ifdown(bonding) be enough? Isn't it required anyway? Line 522: Line 523: Line 524: def removeBridge(self, bridge): Line 525: ifdown(bridge)
-- To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/13752 To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I0cd27f1ff9a62e202c3513e54df5481d1b72ed7c Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Project: vdsm Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Petr Ĺ ebek psebek@redhat.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Antoni Segura Puimedon asegurap@redhat.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg danken@redhat.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Yeela Kaplan ykaplan@redhat.com Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server