Dan Kenigsberg has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: vdsm: [CpuPinning] support for cpuPinning
......................................................................
Patch Set 7: I would prefer that you didn't submit this
(4 inline comments)
....................................................
Commit Message
Line 7: vdsm: [CpuPinning] support for cpuPinning
there's still no reason to mention vdsm in the subject, nor to say cpuPinnging twice.
Line 9: Adds support code to the createDomain functionality in the
my other comment was ignored, too.
....................................................
File vdsm/libvirtvm.py
Line 713: # see
http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/cpu-pinning
url is not updated with new API, I believe.
Line 720: vcpupin.setAttribute('cpuset',
cpuPin.get('pin'))
why "pin" and not "cpuset"? libvirt name is clear, so why stir away of
it? you said you're fine with keeping it.
--
To view, visit
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/4630
To unsubscribe, visit
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia7016848d365d0e59454372461d66d167b100e7e
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Project: vdsm
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Laszlo Hornyak <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg <danken(a)redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Doron Fediuck <dfediuck(a)redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Laszlo Hornyak <lhornyak(a)redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mark Wu <wudxw(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Peter V. Saveliev <peet(a)redhat.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Saggi Mizrahi <smizrahi(a)redhat.com>