On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:08:57AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 09/16/2015 08:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:45:28PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Crickets ... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/virt/
>> The virt list has long been in an odd place. Fedora has best in class
>> virt support, because so many virt developers use it. It also follows
>> upstream very closely, with upstream packages like libvirt and qemu
>> going straight into Rawhide without any significant patching.
>> So there isn't really much need for a Fedora+virt-specific list, since
>> almost any question should go upstream to one of the following lists:
>> - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
>> - https://libvirt.org/contact.html#email
>> - http://wiki.qemu.org/MailingLists
>> - https://libosinfo.org/communicate/
>> - https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
>> Or as a last resort if it really is a rare virt integration issue that
>> only affects to Fedora, then:
>> - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>> - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Can we kill the virt list?
> At this point in time, I'd say yes.
Yeah I've thought similar for a long while too. So I'm for it. I'll leave a
bit more time for discussion but if nothing changes I'll close the list next week.
One week - do you want to close the list or should I? Dan suggested a
method to use here:
I was also interested in whether any web pages reference this list. I
think just these ones:
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.