April 2014 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[fedora-websites] #129: Some links are i686 while others are i386. Consistency update?

by fedora-badges

#129: Some links are i686 while others are i386. Consistency update? -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: shaiton | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------------ That would be better to have only one reference for the INTEL 32b arch. Actually we have i686 and i363, depending on the release and/or build. We need to check if we can't use only one reference, and see with the releng why they name them differently for each release.. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/129> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #246: fedora.css sets a universal scaling factor of 76%, which is much too small

by fedora-badges

#246: fedora.css sets a universal scaling factor of 76%, which is much too small -----------------------+--------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: css font size Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+--------------------------- fedora.css, which all Fedora websites are encouraged to use, has this right at the top: body { font-size: 76%; background: #FFFFFF url(../images/border-left.png) 0 0 repeat-y; } It's been there for years, since before the stuff was imported to git, so its history may be obscure at this point, but Googling around, it looks like 76% was considered a 'rule' by some so-called authorities at some point. http://www.sitepoint.com/css-font-sizing-tutorial/ has mention of it in the comments, http://forums.modx.com/thread/?thread=17583 has some chatter about it, http://www.baekdal.com/insights/new-minimum-font-size is from 2005 and cites 76% as the new *minimum* recommended font size, etc. I think it's pretty unarguably too small for the modern day, though. Taking the standard 'base size' for browsers - 16px - and using the 96dpi convention, text at '76%' is 12.16px in size, which is equivalent to 9pt. How many people do you know who have their desktops set to a 9pt font on a modern system? Particularly a modern *laptop*. Reading text on Fedora sites on most systems without zooming or overriding the CSS or setting a large minimum px size in your browser (which is undesirable for other reasons) is a pretty tiring experience even for me, and I still have effectively perfect eyesight for reading text; it must be more or less impossible for anyone with somewhat less than perfect eyesight. Yes, this is the thing Felix Miata is always banging on about, but you know what? Now I spent a day actually looking into this stuff, he's absolutely damn right. Sorry, Felix. I hope this post was calm and reasonable enough and brought enough numbers. :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/246> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
21
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #211: EC2 AMI listing does not render in Firefox 3.6.14

by fedora-badges

#211: EC2 AMI listing does not render in Firefox 3.6.14 -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: imcleod | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: www.fp.o | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+----------------------- When using Firefox 3.6.14 I see neither a table nor a set of dropdown boxes under the "EC2 images" section here: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options#clouds This is, of course, a very "old" Firefox running on an older and unsupported Fedora release. However, I'm told that the page in question should gracefully adapt to older browsers, and it doesn't seem to be doing so. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/211> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #256: Page empty

by fedora-badges

#256: Page empty ------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: giuseppep | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ------------------------+----------------------- This wiki page [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MarcWiriadisastra] is empty but there are some page that point here, Like this [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mentors/NewMentors] and this [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mentors] that are important and are page with guide how to help the project. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/256> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 11 months

1
5
0 / 0

Possible Security vuln. in the site

by Nishaanth_Kumar

Hey I was testing some of the websites for Security Vulns. I saw this bug in OpenHatch site. It exists also it the homepage of Fedora. I will also include the results of the scan. It is a potential vulnerability. *BUT THE SITE'S RELIABILITY IS ONE THING WHICH SHOULD BE ACCOUNTED FOR* It may be also due to design implementation of the site. Ignore in such case. Here is the result, http://ponycheckup.com/result/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffedoraproject.org%2F Waiting for your reply :) PEACE. Cheerio, Nishaanth Gunasekeran.

9 years, 12 months

2
1
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #260: patch - remove features folder && using folder from f.next fpo

by fedora-badges

#260: patch - remove features folder && using folder from f.next fpo ------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: cydrobolt | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ------------------------+----------------------- -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/260> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

10 years

1
1
0 / 0

Contributing to web related tasks

by Nick Germaine

I like Fedora. Plain and simple. I understand that free software needs contributors to succeed, and so I'm offering my skills up to help out with the websites (I have seen quite a few tickets in there). First, here's an unfinished demo of a website that acts like a desktop: http://pointybracket.net/demo I worked on it a while ago and never finished it. It was kind of aimless to begin with. Here's some other sites I've done: http://pointybracket.net http://amsainc.com http://mvit.ca http://hillcanproductions.com I'm currently working on a project management system usign PHP and a lot of ajax stuff. It's not live anywhere because it's so early in development, so I'll attach a screenshot. You'll notice I'm on ubuntu. I was trying ou 14.04 to see if it's any better, and still don't like it. lol. Anyway, I'd like to join the team and help out. Thanks -- Nick Germaine Web & software developer http://nickgermaine.ca

10 years

3
2
0 / 0

brazilian version

by Adriano Sousa

Prezados, Escrevo para informar que talvez haja um erro de tradução. Quando acessamos a tela de download, há uma informação ao lado da versão Gnome "Fedora por omissão", o correto é "Padrão do Fedora",não é isso? Espero ter contribuído. Cordialmente, Adriano Sousa Pesquisador de cinema e tradutor Dear Sirs, Probably there's an error in the brazilian version of the website. As it can be seen near the Gnome version download option it is writen in portuguese "Fedora por omissão", It may be wrong, the right phrase would be "Padrão do Fedora", isnt it? Greetings, Adriano Sousa Researcher and translator

10 years

3
3
0 / 0

Heartbleed Vulnerability

by Christian Miller

Dear Website Administrator for the Fedora project. I was using a simple Google dork, that I was tweaking to search for heartbleed vulnerable websites when I stumbled upon the server status page of the fedora project. The page in question is https://admin.fedoraproject.org/status/app1. This page indicates the the Fedora project servers run open ssl 1.0.1e . This version of open ssl is vulnerable to the heartbleed exploit. I recommend updating your open ssl as soon as possible. Sincerely, Chris Miller

10 years

2
1
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #258: Update all F20 Download Images with new ISO files, torrents and CHECKSUMS!

by fedora-badges

#258: Update all F20 Download Images with new ISO files, torrents and CHECKSUMS! -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: robyduck | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: ASAP Component: get.fp.o | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+----------------------- Due to the "heartbleed" bug we need not only to upate cloud images, but all images we actually provide, except the install media. Most of them are already in place and are synching out on the mirrors in these hours, you can find the new images here:[[br]] http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/ ARM, Cloud Images and Live Images are already there and have new CHECKSUM files. We will also get Spins rebuilds soon. Please check the link to see if releng build them, but wait a few hours more to let the images get on the mirrors before updating. We also need to check all the torrent files and change the path if needed! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/258> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

10 years

1
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites April 2014