September 2014 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[fedora-websites] #141: Auto-hide the download Alpha button after few days

by fedora-badges

#141: Auto-hide the download Alpha button after few days -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: shaiton | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19 Component: General | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------------ It would be great to hide the download Alpha Now button on the home page after few days (2 weeks?) once released. The Alpha gets outdated really fast. Related to BZ#869573 There is css fix on the git history (319f0c8 cb760b2 846f993 0f1fd78) Same would be fine for the News bar for Release day. No need to take care about this NOW, a month before F19-Alpha is fine. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/141> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 5 months

1
1
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #88: Add link to signature just next to link to installation media

by fedora-badges

#88: Add link to signature just next to link to installation media -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: ppisar | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: get.fp.o | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------------ Current web site with link to installation media (https://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora or https://fedoraproject.org/en /get-fedora-options) does not provide cryptographic signatures necessary to verify integrity. There is only a link ''Verify Download'' six sections underneath which is to far. I propose following improvement: Put link to signature right next to shiny Download links. If the datails about size are important enough, a link to signature could be there too. Like: {{{ Download Now! 605MB, ISO format image for Intel-compatible PCs (32-bit), signature }}} Where the ''signature'' label would point to to /pub/fedora/linux/releases/16/Live/i686/Fedora-16-i686-Live-CHECKSUM. See [http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/160387 fedora-devel maling list] for discussion. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/88> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 5 months

1
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #100: Fedoraproject.org banner (not being dynamic) problem

by fedora-badges

#100: Fedoraproject.org banner (not being dynamic) problem ------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: nippur | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: www.fp.o | Version: Production Keywords: banner, translation, website | Blocked By: Blocking: | ------------------------------------------+------------------------- The amber(features & screenshot), green(downloads), pink?(community), blue(using fedora) and purple(help) color banners at fedoraproject.org are not big enough/don't automatically expand if the (translated) string is more than one line. Text is lost when translation can't be 'one line wide' due to local word length/syntax. Suggested is 'it depends of your browser, probably because "em" font size is used and not px' in combination with website design not being dynamic. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/100> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
2
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #129: Some links are i686 while others are i386. Consistency update?

by fedora-badges

#129: Some links are i686 while others are i386. Consistency update? -------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: shaiton | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------------ That would be better to have only one reference for the INTEL 32b arch. Actually we have i686 and i363, depending on the release and/or build. We need to check if we can't use only one reference, and see with the releng why they name them differently for each release.. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/129> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #246: fedora.css sets a universal scaling factor of 76%, which is much too small

by fedora-badges

#246: fedora.css sets a universal scaling factor of 76%, which is much too small -----------------------+--------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: css font size Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+--------------------------- fedora.css, which all Fedora websites are encouraged to use, has this right at the top: body { font-size: 76%; background: #FFFFFF url(../images/border-left.png) 0 0 repeat-y; } It's been there for years, since before the stuff was imported to git, so its history may be obscure at this point, but Googling around, it looks like 76% was considered a 'rule' by some so-called authorities at some point. http://www.sitepoint.com/css-font-sizing-tutorial/ has mention of it in the comments, http://forums.modx.com/thread/?thread=17583 has some chatter about it, http://www.baekdal.com/insights/new-minimum-font-size is from 2005 and cites 76% as the new *minimum* recommended font size, etc. I think it's pretty unarguably too small for the modern day, though. Taking the standard 'base size' for browsers - 16px - and using the 96dpi convention, text at '76%' is 12.16px in size, which is equivalent to 9pt. How many people do you know who have their desktops set to a 9pt font on a modern system? Particularly a modern *laptop*. Reading text on Fedora sites on most systems without zooming or overriding the CSS or setting a large minimum px size in your browser (which is undesirable for other reasons) is a pretty tiring experience even for me, and I still have effectively perfect eyesight for reading text; it must be more or less impossible for anyone with somewhat less than perfect eyesight. Yes, this is the thing Felix Miata is always banging on about, but you know what? Now I spent a day actually looking into this stuff, he's absolutely damn right. Sorry, Felix. I hope this post was calm and reasonable enough and brought enough numbers. :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/246> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
21
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #211: EC2 AMI listing does not render in Firefox 3.6.14

by fedora-badges

#211: EC2 AMI listing does not render in Firefox 3.6.14 -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: imcleod | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: www.fp.o | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+----------------------- When using Firefox 3.6.14 I see neither a table nor a set of dropdown boxes under the "EC2 images" section here: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options#clouds This is, of course, a very "old" Firefox running on an older and unsupported Fedora release. However, I'm told that the page in question should gracefully adapt to older browsers, and it doesn't seem to be doing so. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/211> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] #271: Update fudcon.fpo for FUDCon LATAM

by fedora-badges

#271: Update fudcon.fpo for FUDCon LATAM -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: robyduck | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: ASAP Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+----------------------- We need to update http://fudcon.fedoraproject.org to FUDCon LATAM Managua 2014. The best would be just to replace FUDCOn Beijing on the main page with Managua and then update also location and the other pages. Remember to activate the nav-menu link to Latam and drop the APAC link since there is no planned APAC FUDCon at the moment. Pages should be up to date ASAP, FUDCon will be from october 23-25th. Important references for our content: * Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon:Managua_2014 * LATAM webpage: http://fudconlatam.org/ * Banner (I asked for SVG too or a bigger one): http://fudconlatam.org/static/img/logo.png -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/271> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

9 years, 6 months

1
4
0 / 0

Page appears to be out of date?

by Jonathan Vaughan

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chromium I tried installing chrome in the end as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chromium, it wouldnt: [root@localhost home]# yum-config-manager --add-repo= http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium-stable/fedora-chromium-... Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit adding repo from: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/...um-stable.repo <http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium-stable/fedora-chromium-...> grabbing file http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/...um-stable.repo <http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium-stable/fedora-chromium-...> to /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-chromium-stable.repo repo saved to /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-chromium-stable.repo [root@localhost home]# yum install chromium -yLoaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/...ta/repomd.xml: <http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium-stable/fedora-20/i386/r...:> [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 404 - Not Found Trying other mirror. No package chromium available. Error: Nothing to do [root@localhost home]#

9 years, 6 months

2
3
0 / 0

No package system-config-selinux available

by Paul Campbell

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_FAQ#How_do_I_enable_or_disable_SELi... says use system-config-selinux but install fails yum install system-config-selinux Loaded plugins: langpacks No package system-config-selinux available. Error: Nothing to do Note: Trailer for the page: - This page was last modified on 23 June 2014, at 22:35

9 years, 7 months

3
6
0 / 0

can't load older Fedora-Distros via bfo

by Andreas Hein

Hello sir, i am not able to load older Fedora-Distros via BFO. It seems that the have moved to an archive directory, but BFO is refeering to its original locations. Is it possible to make changes to BFO to m ake it work again. Thanks Andreas Hein Berlin Germany

9 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites September 2014