websites April 2016

websites@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
42 discussions

[fedora-websites] #369: Fedora Server: do not advertise 32-bit media
by fedora-badges 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

#369: Fedora Server: do not advertise 32-bit media --------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: sgallagh | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 24 Component: getfedora | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+----------------------- In Fedora 24, the Server SIG intended to stop producing i686 media entirely, to focus only on x86_64 and ARM. Due to rel-eng constraints, we won't be able to avoid ''creating'' the media, so we would like to request that the getfedora.org website not include any download links for them. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/369> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 4

[Fedora Infrastructure] #5040: can't find the current mailing lists from the home page
by fedora-badges 31 May '16

31 May '16

#5040: can't find the current mailing lists from the home page --------------------------+----------------------------- Reporter: chrismurphy | Owner: webmaster Type: annoyance | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: HANDWAVY-FUTURE Component: Web Content | Version: Production Severity: High | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: Sensitive: 0 | --------------------------+----------------------------- = phenomenon = http://fedoraproject.org/ -> https://getfedora.org/ where the word "list" doesn't appear anywhere. The closest similar link, forums, directs away from fedoraproject.org to a 3rd party, http://fedoraforum.org/. I have to do a google or duckduckgo search to find them. = reason = Lack of link for mailing lists on the home page. = recommendation = Put a link on the home page for mailing lists. I'm thinking of this one: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo Or maybe there's a more appropriate one now that the hyperkitty switch has been flipped. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5040> Fedora Infrastructure <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code.

1 5

[fedora-websites] #362: Link to Release Announcement on getfedora.org
by fedora-badges 18 May '16

18 May '16

#362: Link to Release Announcement on getfedora.org --------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: ryanlerch | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+----------------------- Was thinking, it might be a good idea to have a link to the release announcement for the current release on the Fedora Magazine somewhere on getfedora.org Maybe on the page for each edition -- not sure about where. We also do a regular "What's new in fedora X <edition>" article too (for f23, we only have the workstation one, but we want to do all three for f24), so this might be good to have instead of the release announcement, Not 100% sure. this is just to direct users to the best source of information about the changes in the current release of Fedora, as getfedora.org's information is more just about all fedora features, not just the new ones. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/362> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 3

[fedora-websites] #386: Prepare websites for F24 Beta release
by fedora-badges 14 May '16

14 May '16

#386: Prepare websites for F24 Beta release -----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: robyduck | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: ASAP Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: -----------------------+----------------------- Alpha pages are already out, so we don't have many changes to do for Beta release. The websites are already built from f24-beta branch, you can look at them in staging. We need to check all links, it might be releng changed the paths again. We won't have probably any Atomic image again. * Check all Download links and paths * Add CHECKSUM files to static/checksums and verify that the paths are correct. * Add EC2 AMI IDs for Beta.Our script is working also for prerelease, but let's add them also manually to globalvar.py. * Check and eventually fix checksum paths in all verify pages * Remove static/checksums/Fedora-XX-Alpha* in all websites. * Update Beta Image sizes and pre_cloud_composedate in ./build.d/globalvar.py. Verify they are right in Cloud images and Docker image. * Update the new POT files and push them to Zanata We have go/no-go today, it might be we slip for at least a week. If not, let's get in contact immediately with releng. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/386> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 1

fedora export
by 杉村好謙 / SUGIMURA，YOSHIKANE 09 May '16

09 May '16

To whom it may concern, Please pardon the sudden mail. My Name is Yoshikane Sugimura and I work at Hitachi, Ltd. in Japan. We are developing an embedded OS based on fedora. We are planning to export this OS. In Japan of the low, it is necessary to clarify the encryption algorithm and its key length. (Q1)Would you have such cases. (Q2)Please tell me the encryption algorithm and its key length using in fedora. Please advice me. Yours faithfully, ----- Yoshikane Sugimura yoshikane.sugimura.kk(a)hitachi.com

2 1

Download verification broken
by Dan Haskell 01 May '16

01 May '16

Downloaded iso of the server edition. Tried to verify following instructions and failed. First your key is not certified. > gpg --verify-files Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Oct 2015 01:31:05 PM PDT using RSA key ID 34EC9CBA gpg: Good signature from "Fedora (23) <fedora-23-primary(a)fedoraproject.org>" [unknown] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: EF45 5106 80FB 0232 6B04 5AFB 3247 4CF8 34EC 9CBA Second, it appears to be the wrong key(?) > ls Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso > sha256sum -c Fedora-Server-23-x86_64-CHECKSUM Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-23.iso: OK sha256sum: Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-23.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: WARNING: 20 lines are improperly formatted sha256sum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read Couldn't you just provide a md5sum instead? The gpg stuff is cool and all, but when it fails... give us something to work with. Clicked on support, but it's just a link to a BUNCH of forums. Not helpful. Dan

3 3

[fedora-websites] #326: need redirect for http://fedoraproject.org/sponsors.html
by fedora-badges 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

#326: need redirect for http://fedoraproject.org/sponsors.html ----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ----------------------+----------------------- The page at http://fedoraproject.org/sponsors.html is now at https://getfedora.org/sponsors, but there are still incoming links to the former, which now just redirects to top-level getfedora. Can we add a specific redirect? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/326> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 2

[fedora-websites] #364: developers.fedoraproject.org a DNS record
by fedora-badges 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

#364: developers.fedoraproject.org a DNS record ----------------------+----------------------- Reporter: phracek | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ----------------------+----------------------- Hi folks, I am happy that we have a developer.fedoraproject.org page. We need to improve it and help to users. Could you please create a DNS record developers.fedoraproject.org which will refer to developer.fedoraproject.org? I guess, it would be awesome to have it before. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/364> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 1

[fedora-websites] #387: Fedora Server, Cloud and Workstation website points in Germany to the Swiss website, which is in english
by fedora-badges 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

#387: Fedora Server, Cloud and Workstation website points in Germany to the Swiss website, which is in english ---------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: koyuawsmbrtn | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: getfedora | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ---------------------------+----------------------- '''Steps to reproduce:''' - Clicking on one of these three images (Cloud, Server, Workstation) - Link points to https://getfedora.org/de_CH/workstation/ - Website is in english, not german '''What I expected:''' - Clicking on one of these three images (Cloud, Server, Workstation) - Link points to https://getfedora.org/de/workstation/ - Website is in german CH stands for swiss, but in Germany it points to the Swiss website, which is in english. Don't know why, maybe someone forgot to copy the localization to the Swiss website. The austrian website doesn't exist, so it would be nice if somebody could replace the Swiss website with the German one or just change the link. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/387> fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites> Fedora Website Team's Trac instance

1 1

Introduction Email
by Drew Meigs 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

Hi, everyone. My name is Drew and I am relatively new to Fedora, but not to Linux (I have been working with Debia-based systems for the better part of 10 years). I have a little experience with websites, but I think I would still be a good fit with this group. I have some working knowledge of HTML and a little of XML. Also, I am a fast study. I would very much like to get involved with the website team. I am trying to do some work with groups like CommOps and the Docs team, but I feel like I would also really like to work on the website. I look forward to working with you all. Drew

3 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites April 2016