October 2018 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[fedora-websites] Issue #884: The second line of the header of the privacy policy has not been included in the translation yet.

by Ooyama Yosiyuki

sujiniku reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` about https://getfedora.org/en/ etc, about the header of the privacy policy, the sentence "Use of Fedora services is subject to these terms starting May 25, 2018." is not included in POT. I think that the cause is , probably, because this sentence is not specified by html h5 tag, so that this sentence maybe not recognized as a sentence by gettext. https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/blob/8372816c5f96cb4673fb03a8cd581bb0fa... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/884

5 years, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #888: F-29 Beta checksums are missing for ppc64le and s390x

by Mohan Boddu

mohanboddu reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Info at https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7883 Also, I can see the checksums on the mirrors: For ex: https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/tes... and https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/tes... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/888

5 years, 4 months

4
6
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #862: Publish F30 key at https://getfedora.org/keys/

by Randy Barlow

bowlofeggs reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` * Describe what you need us to do: Please publish the Fedora 30 GPG key at https://getfedora.org/keys/. * When do you need this? (YYYY/MM/DD) No due date. * When is this no longer needed or useful? (YYYY/MM/DD) When Fedora 30 goes EOL. * If we cannot complete your request, what is the impact? There won't be a great way for users to know which key ID to expect on F30 packages. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/862

5 years, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #880: Make Silverblue strings on GetFedora.org translatable

by Daniel Rusek

asciiwolf reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Fedora Silverblue related strings from the GetFedora.org [download page](https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/) are not available for translation on Zanata and are not present in pofiles for some reason. Maybe the _getfedora.pot_ file needs to be re-generated? Please, consider fixing this. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/880

5 years, 4 months

2
5
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #885: drop ppc64 from download pages at alt.fp.o

by Dan Horák

sharkcz reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` We are dropping ppc64 (the big endian variant) architecture in F-29 (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/ChangeSet#Discontinue_PPC64_as...) and the websites should reflect it. for F-29 Beta https://alt.fedoraproject.org/prerelease/index.html https://alt.fedoraproject.org/en/verify-prereleases.html https://alt.fedoraproject.org/alt/ for F-29 GA `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/885

5 years, 5 months

3
4
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #879: Docs links at bottom of download pages need to be updated for Antora

by Matthew Miller

mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` basically, we resurrected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488437 now they're not broken, but they go to the annoying interstitial `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/879

5 years, 5 months

2
2
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #826: aarch64 missing from getfedora.org server download page

by Peter Robinson

pbrobinson reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` As of Fedora 28 aarch64 is a Primary architecture and as such needs to be referenced from the main Fedora Server download page https://getfedora.org/en_GB/server/download/ That only lists x86_64 where it should also directly reference the aarch64 Server artifacts: * Install ISO: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/28/Server/aa... * Netinst ISO: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/28/Server/aa... * Disk image: https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/28/Server/aa... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/826

5 years, 5 months

5
13
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #894: Python Classroom Lab not listed at labs.fedoraproject.org

by Miro Hrončok

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Not sure if I've done anything wrong, but I cannot see Python Classroom Lab at labs.fedoraproject.org `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/894

5 years, 5 months

2
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #892: "About Fedora" page is moved.

by Ooyama Yosiyuki

sujiniku reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` In the footer, the "About Fedora" page is moved to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/ `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/892

5 years, 5 months

3
4
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #899: Fedora 29 getfedora.org missing aarch64 downloads for Server

by Stephen Gallagher

sgallagh reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` We alerted the websites teams six months ago in https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/826 that aarch64 must be visible at identical priority to x86_64 on the getfedora.org site. I advised in that ticket that the design of the site should be similar to that of the Atomic page, eschewing a top-level "download" button in favor of separate downloads in the page contents. This request went unanswered. Today, @pbrobinson drew my attention to the fact that the F29 download page STILL does not provide an immediately-identifiable download link for aarch64. (And no, the "Other Downloads" section does *not* meet our requirement for primary support.) This needs to be resolved immediately and with haste; Fedora has partnerships with ARM hardware vendors that are at risk due to this mistake. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/899

5 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites October 2018