December 2020 - websites - Fedora mailing-lists

[fedora-websites] Issue #771: Fedoracommunity.org is not fully loaded in Zanata
by Zdenek Chmelar 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

zdenek reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Topic discussed in translation mailing list - there are strings in Fedoracommunity.org that cannot be loaded in Zanata due to genshi mistakes in the web source code and thanks that can't be translated. Please fix those mistakes to allow the scripts an upload of the strings to Zanata. Thank you Z. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/771

3 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #821: Recreate a script that only shows languages translated over 25%
by Robert Mayr 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

robyduck reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` We had this functionality on transifex and it was easy to set up. Now on zanata we have much more languages, but most of them son't have more than 5-10% translated strings. We should recreate our script which doesn't show languages if they are not translated for at least 25%. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/821

4 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #941: alt downloads french: "netinstall" is translated and breaks the design
by Anisse Astier 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

anisse reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` On https://alt.fedoraproject.org/fr/alt/ "netinstall" is translated and its long translation breaks the design of the page. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/941

5 9

[fedora-websites] Issue #961: Minor content issues with flocktofedora.org
by David Yaffe 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

dyaffe reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Three are some minor content issue with [https://flocktofedora.org](https://flocktofedora.org). Using page source for line numbers: 1. Under **WHAT WILL WE DO AT FLOCK?** - There is an extra 'm' at the end of the 'Communicate the Fedora Strategy' Bullet (line 82) 2. Under **Download**, 'Get Fedora Atomic' should be updated to 'Get Fedora Silverblue'. The corresponding link also needs to be updated. (line 359) 3. Under **Support**, The link for 'Installation Guide' should be updated for Fedora 30. (Line 375) `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/961

4 6

[fedora-websites] Issue #969: flocktofedora.org is not fully mobile ready
by Rafał Lużyński 03 Jun '22

03 Jun '22

rluzynski reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Screenshot by @x3mboy (thank you). This explains all. <!!image> `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/969

5 6

[fedora-websites] Issue #1038: Fedora podcast site
by Eduard Lucena 11 Jan '22

11 Jan '22

x3mboy reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` I'm working with the Fedora Podcast. I was trying to get a new site in the past and I already got a [wordpress instance](https://fedorapod.wpengine.com/) that I'm not sure if it's hosted in Fedora Infra, but what I'm needing for you is to get the design that was done in design#584 that I need to move to a WP theme. Part of the assets needed are in design#577 Thanks in advance. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1038

3 7

[fedora-websites] Issue #942: Overhaul fedora-websites generation and hosting
by Ryan Lerch 04 Nov '21

04 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Currently, we use a bunch of scripts and Make to generate the websites. Furthermore, we use genshi tempates as the basis of the sites. This system is quite old, and has some challenges. From a template / theming point of view, there are many times where templates contain duplicated code, and other issues that make it hard for community members to jump into helping out on the websites. The idea of this ticket is to facilitate discussion on issues of the current process, and progress through to thinking up solutions. Ultimately, hopefully, we can use this ticket as a tracking ticket for tasks as we progress. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/942

5 5

[fedora-websites] Issue #882: RFE: Beta Landing Page
by Langdon White 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

langdon reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Would be nice if "Fedora 29 Beta released! Test it in the Download section." linked to something like https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease.html. Or, failing that, had a section on the page about the beta. If you see this sentence and search for "beta" in the page you find nothing. If you search for "download" you only find the download block in the footer which doesn't seem relevant. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/882

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #939: Remove fudcon.fedoraproject.org from the websites repo
by Ryan Lerch 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fudcon.fedoraproject.org is no longer in use, and just redirects to the flock website. IMHO, we should remove it from the repo, since it is no longer in use. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/939

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #940: Remove fedorahosted.org from the repo
by Ryan Lerch 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fedorahosted.org is now just a redirect to the wiki page. we should remove it from the repo. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/940

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #945: Keep website Atomic content on F29 instead of moving to F30
by Sinny Kumari 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

sinnykumari reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` In the favor of upcoming Fedora CoreOS, Atomic Host last release is based on Fedora 29 https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-announce/2019-… . This ticket is to make sure that we stay on Fedora 29 as major version for future Fedora Atomic Host Two Week releases instead of moving to Fedora 30. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/945

2 2

[fedora-websites] Issue #889: license for downloads from getfedora.org is underspecified
by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

zbyszek reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The licenses for ISOs and other stuff that Fedora Project produces is not specified on the download website. It should be prominently visible. I think there should be a short sentence like > Fedora is always free for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. It is a compilation of software packages, each under its own license. Images that can be downloaded here are available under the combination of licenses of the constituent software packages and the license of the Fedora project itself. See [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement#License] https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ is a good example of how this could be done. It has three panes, and the third one is "terms & conditons" and includes an obvious link to a license. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org…. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/889

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #887: macOS version of Fedora Media Writer from getfedora.org failing to install
by Bartek 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

ozeszty reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` There's been reports about https://getfedora.org/fmw/FedoraMediaWriter-osx-4.1.1.dmg failing to install. https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/4.1.1/FedoraMedia… Is confirmed to be working. Also, there's no system requirements (e.g. minimum supported system version) for FMW. More details: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/127672/fedora-downloader-tool-for… P.S. I don't have any macOS device, so I can't help testing it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/887

4 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #949: stg.getfedora.org/en/workstation/ has pictures with F30 beta wallpaper
by Miro Hrončok 03 Nov '21

03 Nov '21

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The wallpaper (desktop background image) was updated for Fedora 30 final. https://stg.getfedora.org/en/workstation/ shows the image from F30 beta. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F30_Artwork `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/949

2 2

[fedora-websites] Issue #787: Greek fonts for "Choose Freedom. Choose Fedora" look different
by Nikos Charonitakis 20 Oct '21

20 Oct '21

charnik reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Translated message "Choose Freedom. Choose Fedora" in Greek use different font family than the rest Greek text and English text in this page. Result is not aesthetically good. Look at the image: <!!image> `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/787

2 1

[fedora-websites] Issue #761: add language button to fedoracommunity.org
by Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 20 Aug '21

20 Aug '21

jibecfed reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` we recently had the luck to get translation for Gujarati language, but I couldn't switch to the language to help the contributor. Can you please add a language button as we have for other websites? http://fedoracommunity.org/en/emea thanks a lot `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/761

4 5

[fedora-websites] Issue #1013: please migrate to the new Fedora translation platform
by Jean-Baptiste Holcroft 15 Aug '21

15 Aug '21

jibecfed reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Hello, the Fedora project migrates its translation platform to Weblate [1]. This tool directly interact with your git repository, and requires us to know: * [mandatory] which branch is your development branch? * [mandatory] have you merged latest translation from Zanata and locked the project? * [info] Weblate will handle updates when pot file changes, don't edit po files for this [2] * [optional] what is the license of translation? (please use a code from https://spdx.org/licenses/) * [optional] do you have any announcement/warning you would like to display to the translators? (it will be displayed in Weblate) * [optional] do you need us to activate any specific checks? (this is a setting per component [3]) * [optional] do you need us to automatically detect new translation files? (typical usecase: website translation with one translation file per page) Please note: * For github and gitlab hosted projects, Weblate open pull request. For other git hosting, you'll have to add a key to allow commits. * In Weblate's vocable, one project is a group of component. Each component is a translation file. You can have many projects or many components or both. * You can change your mind over time, just reach trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [1] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-localization-platform-migrat… [2] https://docs.weblate.org/en/latest/admin/continuous.html#avoiding-merge-con… [3] https://docs.weblate.org/en/latest/user/checks.html#translation-checks `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1013

3 13

[fedora-websites] Issue #1009: migrate to python3
by Dan Horák 10 Jun '21

10 Jun '21

sharkcz reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Please migrate the build system to Python3 as Python2 is a no-go in newer Fedora releases. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1009

5 6

[fedora-websites] Issue #947: firefox thinks there is a tracking cookie on getfedora.org
by Kevin Fenzi 05 May '21

05 May '21

kevin reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` There does seem to be a cookie, I am not sure what it's for, but we should either drop it or figure out how to make it not appear like a tracking cookie to firefox. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/947

4 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #1040: Change/Update Fedora KDE spin webpage
by Harsh Jain 22 Apr '21

22 Apr '21

amerepeasant reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: ``  Hey , The apps displayed on the fedora kde spin webpage and the apps that com with it are different . The web browser that comes with the spin is told to be konqueror , but firefox and falkon are included in the spin instead . I think there were other apps that are shown on the site but are not there in the spin . I request that the web page be changed/updated to display the correct set of apps . Thanks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1040

3 6

[fedora-websites] Issue #1056: What the Fedora i3 SIG needs to add the their spin in the spins website
by Eduard Lucena 22 Apr '21

22 Apr '21

x3mboy reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The Fedora i3 SIG got their spin added as a Change and we want to know to add this new Spin in the Spins website `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1056

6 23

[fedora-websites] Issue #955: Instructions for Mac install
by Erez Tavor 27 Jan '21

27 Jan '21

erezpitke reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` For those that have Mac detected a note at the bottom on how to install after the image below is shown <!!image> (Preferences > Security & Privacy > General > Allow Apps downloaded from unidentified developers) There is a link below the download button asking - 'Need instructions? and it brings you to a section with no instructions.. Of course, it would be great if the file was from an 'identified developer' `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/955

4 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #1030: Fedoramagazine should provide HSTS
by Christoph Kern 14 Jan '21

14 Jan '21

sheogorath reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The Fedoramagazine websites doesn't provide a [HSTS header](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security). It is a security best practice to provide HSTS these days in order to have everyone using HTTPS by default and prevent downgrade attacks. https://hstspreload.org/?domain=fedoramagazine.org `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1030

3 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #964: Download page for Fedora CoreOS
by Benjamin Gilbert 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

bgilbert reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` With Fedora CoreOS entering preview within the next month or two, we'll need a download page on getfedora.org, and that page will need several unusual elements: - All release image URLs, cloud image IDs, etc., will come from [stream metadata](https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/98) JSON documents which are fetched client-side and rendered into the page. That metadata will be hosted alongside the artifacts, and will change at least every two weeks. - We'll need to link to release images for three different streams: `stable`, `testing`, and `next`. We'll need language explaining the difference (similar to [this](https://coreos.com/releases/)) and a recommendation to run a small percentage of nodes on `testing` and `next` and report problems to our [issue tracker](https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues). - Each OS platform will have a separate release image. There will be an initial set of platforms, and more will be added over time: - Bare metal and virtualized images (e.g. QEMU, VMware) will have downloadable artifacts, with corresponding hashes and GPG signatures. Hashes will come from stream metadata; detached signatures will be a separate artifact. - Cloud images will have image identifiers (e.g. AMI IDs on AWS) and corresponding instructions (such as a launch button or sample command line) for running the image. - Preferably, we'd include a recommendation to subscribe to the [coreos-status mailing list](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/coreos-status@lists.fed…, to ensure we have a way to send operational notifications to our users. The above is a lot of requirements, I know. It might be too much to fit on one page, even with most of the content shown conditionally; I'd like some input there. CoreOS Container Linux addressed a similar problem by having [distinct pages for each platform](https://coreos.com/os/docs/latest/#running-coreos), which was a maintenance nightmare and probably too complex. I'm happy to work with folks to arrive at something implementable. As to timing: this doesn't _need_ to be ready for the preview release in the next month or two, but it would help. (If that's infeasible, the Fedora CoreOS team will need to put together a temporary page elsewhere with substantially the items listed above.) The page must be ready before Fedora CoreOS goes stable, which will be ~6 months after the preview release. Thanks! `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/964

5 11

[fedora-websites] Issue #1032: labs.fedoraproject.org does not show labs on mobile
by Ankur Sinha 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

ankursinha reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Hello, Just noticed this on my phone: when accessing labs.fp.o there, the spins aren't show. We skip from the "Fedora 32 released .." bit straight to "What is Fedora labs?". <!!image> `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1032

2 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #1042: Content for infographic to highlight accomplishments of Fedora Web!
by Smera Goel 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

smeragoel reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` As a thank you for all the efforts Fedora Web puts in building and maintaining websites for the Fedora Project, the design team is working on a set of infographics to highlight the accomplishments of all the people who worked and contributed to Fedora in the past year. For this, we request you to share accomplishments, stories, metrics etc. of individuals and/or teams in your group! It can be anything from the number of new websites added to easter eggs hidden in websites. Looking forward to reading amazing things! :D `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1042

2 1

[fedora-websites] Issue #946: Expected editions status for F30
by Matthew Miller 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

mattdm reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Putting this here in one ticket for reference: * Fedora Workstation as normal * Fedora Server: same, but will *also* include Fedora Cloud (but not Atomic/CoreOS) * Fedora Atomic: no longer an edition. As I understand it, current version will be supported a little longer yet but we don't want to encourage new installs * Fedora CoreOS: not _quite_ ready to be an edition, but we want to launch as an edition shortly after. (June?) * Fedora IoT: also not quite ready to be an edition. Will be at https://iot.fedoraproject.org/. Also plan to launch as an edition in around June. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/946

3 4

[fedora-websites] Issue #1027: Dead link in footer :download Fedora Atomic
by Sanne Grinovero 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

sanne reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` On page https://alt.fedoraproject.org/ the footer contains a link "Get Fedora Atomic", which points to a 404. Not sure what needs to be done, probably just removed? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1027

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #1037: Link of "Get Fedora Atomic" in footer is no longer found at destination page.
by Ooyama Yosiyuki 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

sujiniku reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: ``  The footer of https://spins.fedoraproject.org/en/ , Although "Get Fedora Atomic" is exist, but the target page is "Not Found". Because of changing of CoreOS . https://getfedora.org/en/coreos?stream=stable We should change the Atomic link in the footer to CoreOS link . `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1037

3 3

[fedora-websites] Issue #1048: alt.fedoraproject.org: alternative download page: Netinstall is marketed as Server edition
by Flo H 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

augenauf reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` I noted that on https://alt.fedoraproject.org/en/ that the netinstall image is marketed as Server edition. I think this is misleading and playing down the huge potential of this image. As far as I am aware, the netinstall image, by default, isn't a certain edition. It is rather a tool to install any edition the user may want. Should we change that? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1048

4 8

[fedora-websites] Issue #1053: Size matters
by svsvsarma 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

svsvsarma reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Thank you Fedora 33-Cinn. The look and feel of it is quite notable. But it is bulging … perhaps due to more features. Fedora-Cinn portal says 1.8 GB, while downloading 2.1 GB and after download 2.2 GB (2218295296 bytes). They passed checksums and media tests. A bit confusing due to size ambiguity. If the size is given in bytes it will be reassuring, as the size matters. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1053

2 2

[fedora-websites] Issue #1055: arm.fedoraproject.org doesn't list Workstation images
by Ben Cotton 21 Dec '20

21 Dec '20

bcotton reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` As reported by @mattdm, arm.fedoraproject.org doesn't list Workstation images. It probably should. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1055

2 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites December 2020