July 2021 - websites - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[fedora-websites] Issue #882: RFE: Beta Landing Page

by Langdon White

langdon reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` Would be nice if "Fedora 29 Beta released! Test it in the Download section." linked to something like https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease.html. Or, failing that, had a section on the page about the beta. If you see this sentence and search for "beta" in the page you find nothing. If you search for "download" you only find the download block in the footer which doesn't seem relevant. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/882

2 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #939: Remove fudcon.fedoraproject.org from the websites repo

by Ryan Lerch

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fudcon.fedoraproject.org is no longer in use, and just redirects to the flock website. IMHO, we should remove it from the repo, since it is no longer in use. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/939

2 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #1077: Fedora 34 Everything ISO checksum

by Benedik T

duchampdev reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` I downloaded the Everything ISO of F34 from https://alt.fedoraproject.org/ and wanted to verify my download. Apparently, the link to the checksum is broken (https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Everything-34-1.2-x86_64-CH...). However, the checksum is available at https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/34/iso/Fedora-Everything-34-1.2-x8.... In the IRC, I was asked to file this as an issue in here. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1077

2 years, 5 months

4
5
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #940: Remove fedorahosted.org from the repo

by Ryan Lerch

ryanlerch reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` fedorahosted.org is now just a redirect to the wiki page. we should remove it from the repo. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/940

2 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #945: Keep website Atomic content on F29 instead of moving to F30

by Sinny Kumari

sinnykumari reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` In the favor of upcoming Fedora CoreOS, Atomic Host last release is based on Fedora 29 https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-announce/201... . This ticket is to make sure that we stay on Fedora 29 as major version for future Fedora Atomic Host Two Week releases instead of moving to Fedora 30. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/945

2 years, 5 months

2
2
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #889: license for downloads from getfedora.org is underspecified

by Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

zbyszek reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The licenses for ISOs and other stuff that Fedora Project produces is not specified on the download website. It should be prominently visible. I think there should be a short sentence like > Fedora is always free for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. It is a compilation of software packages, each under its own license. Images that can be downloaded here are available under the combination of licenses of the constituent software packages and the license of the Fedora project itself. See [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement#License]. https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ is a good example of how this could be done. It has three panes, and the third one is "terms & conditons" and includes an obvious link to a license. See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o.... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/889

2 years, 5 months

3
3
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #887: macOS version of Fedora Media Writer from getfedora.org failing to install

by Bartek

ozeszty reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` There's been reports about https://getfedora.org/fmw/FedoraMediaWriter-osx-4.1.1.dmg failing to install. https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/4.1.1/FedoraMed... Is confirmed to be working. Also, there's no system requirements (e.g. minimum supported system version) for FMW. More details: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/127672/fedora-downloader-tool-f... P.S. I don't have any macOS device, so I can't help testing it. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/887

2 years, 5 months

4
4
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #949: stg.getfedora.org/en/workstation/ has pictures with F30 beta wallpaper

by Miro Hrončok

churchyard reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` The wallpaper (desktop background image) was updated for Fedora 30 final. https://stg.getfedora.org/en/workstation/ shows the image from F30 beta. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F30_Artwork `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/949

2 years, 5 months

2
2
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #1087: Remove the "old page" tag from "Communicating and getting help" fedoraproject.org/wiki page

by Grzegorz Kowzan

gkowzan reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` «This page has been marked as "old", and likely contains content that is irrelevant or incorrect» The quote above is the first thing you see when you open [Communicating and getting help](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help) wiki page. You can easily reach it by going to getfedora.org, going down and clicking Get Help, which is something you're likely to do when you're considering switching to Fedora and want to know beforehand what documentation and resources are available. It makes Fedora look like a failing project with apathetic developers and nonexistent community, and certainly made me reconsider switching to Fedora in the past. Ironically enough, the discussion page contains a recommendation to remove the old page tag---dated January 6, 2017---and the first sentence tries to assure you that "Fedora has a strong community that is ready to help you". Could the old page tag be removed? `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1087

2 years, 6 months

5
7
0 / 0

[fedora-websites] Issue #1068: PPC64LE CHECKSUM file link is missing from https://alt.fedoraproject.org/en/verify.html

by grub les

grbs615 reported a new issue against the project: `fedora-websites` that you are following: `` See issue title. There's no link to the CHECKSUM file. I had to ask on #fedora-devel and someone was kind enough to point me to https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/Fedora-Workstation-33-1.2-ppc64le-.... `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/1068

2 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

websites July 2021